Serra M C, Treuth M S, Ryan A S
Monica C. Serra, Baltimore VA Medical Center, 10 N. Greene St, GRECC (BT/18/GR), Baltimore, MD 21201, Phone: (410) 605 7000 x 4199, Fax: (410) 605 7913, Email:
J Nutr Health Aging. 2014 Dec;18(10):888-93. doi: 10.1007/s12603-014-0481-9.
To compare the effects of weight loss with and without exercise on 1) dietary prescription adherence and 2) non-structured activity in postmenopausal women.
Longitudinal study.
Clinical research setting with facility based exercise and nutrition education.
Overweight and obese women, 45-76 years old.
6 months of weight loss alone (WL; N=38) or with aerobic exercise (AEX+WL; N=41).
Cardiorespiratory fitness (VO2max), resting metabolic rate (RMR), seven day food intake, and physical activity (by Actical accelerometers worn in a subset subgroup: WL: N=10; AEX+WL: N=15) were assessed before and after the interventions.
Both interventions resulted in similar weight loss (9%) and no significant changes in RMR, while only the AEX+WL group improved VO2max (10%). At baseline, the AEX+WL group consumed slightly more protein than the WL group (P<0.01). Macronutrient intake did not change following AEX+WL, but the WL group decreased their fat intake and increased their carbohydrates and protein intakes (Ps<0.05), which resulted in similar macronutrient intakes between groups post-intervention. Weekday total activity counts decreased 22% (P<0.05) following WL. This change tended (P=0.07) to be different than the lack of change in non-structured activity observed following AEX+WL.
Although similar dietary adherence was observed, these data suggest that postmenopausal women undergoing weight loss may benefit from the addition of exercise to prevent the decline in non-structured activity observed following weight loss alone.
比较有运动和无运动的减肥方式对绝经后女性的以下两方面影响:1)饮食处方依从性;2)非结构化活动。
纵向研究。
具备设施化运动和营养教育的临床研究环境。
45 - 76岁的超重和肥胖女性。
单独进行6个月的减肥(WL;n = 38)或结合有氧运动(AEX + WL;n = 41)。
在干预前后评估心肺适能(最大摄氧量)、静息代谢率(RMR)、七天食物摄入量以及身体活动情况(通过在一个亚组中佩戴Actical加速度计测量:WL组:n = 10;AEX + WL组:n = 15)。
两种干预措施导致的体重减轻相似(约9%),RMR无显著变化,而只有AEX + WL组的最大摄氧量提高了约10%。在基线时,AEX + WL组比WL组摄入的蛋白质略多(P < 0.01)。AEX + WL后宏量营养素摄入量没有变化,但WL组减少了脂肪摄入量,增加了碳水化合物和蛋白质摄入量(P < 0.05),这导致干预后两组之间的宏量营养素摄入量相似。WL后工作日的总活动计数下降了22%(P < 0.05)。这种变化与AEX + WL后观察到的非结构化活动缺乏变化相比,有不同趋势(P = 0.07)。
尽管观察到相似的饮食依从性,但这些数据表明,正在减肥的绝经后女性可能会从增加运动中受益,以防止仅通过减肥后出现的非结构化活动减少。