Lansley Sally M, Cheah Hui Min, Varano Della Vergiliana Julius F, Chakera Aron, Lee Y C Gary
1 Pleural Disease Unit, Lung Institute of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
2 School of Medicine and Pharmacology, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia; and.
Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2015 Jul;53(1):105-12. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2014-0017OC.
Pleural infection is common. Evacuation of infected pleural fluid is essential for successful treatment, but it is often difficult because of adhesions/loculations within the effusion and the viscosity of the fluid. Intrapleural delivery of tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) (to break the adhesions) and deoxyribonuclease (DNase) (to reduce fluid viscosity) has recently been shown to improve clinical outcomes in a large randomized study of pleural infection. Clinical studies of intrapleural fibrinolytic therapy have consistently shown subsequent production of large effusions, the mechanism(s) of which are unknown. We aimed to determine the mechanism by which tPA induces exudative fluid formation. Intrapleural tPA, with or without DNase, significantly induced pleural fluid accumulation in CD1 mice (tPA alone: median [interquartile range], 53.5 [30-355] μl) compared with DNase alone or vehicle controls (both, 0.0 [0.0-0.0] μl) after 6 hours. Fluid induction was reproduced after intrapleural delivery of streptokinase and urokinase, indicating a class effect. Pleural fluid monocyte chemotactic protein (MCP)-1 levels strongly correlated with effusion volume (r = 0.7302; P = 0.003), and were significantly higher than MCP-1 levels in corresponding sera. Mice treated with anti-MCP-1 antibody (P < 0.0001) or MCP-1 receptor antagonist (P = 0.0049) demonstrated a significant decrease in tPA-induced pleural fluid formation (by up to 85%). Our data implicate MCP-1 as the key molecule governing tPA-induced fluid accumulation. The role of MCP-1 in the development of other exudative effusions warrants examination.
胸腔感染很常见。引流感染性胸腔积液是成功治疗的关键,但由于积液内的粘连/分隔以及液体的黏稠度,这一操作往往很困难。近期一项关于胸腔感染的大型随机研究表明,胸腔内注射组织型纤溶酶原激活剂(tPA,用于分解粘连)和脱氧核糖核酸酶(DNase,用于降低液体黏稠度)可改善临床结局。胸腔内纤溶治疗的临床研究一直显示,随后会出现大量胸腔积液,但其机制尚不清楚。我们旨在确定tPA诱导渗出液形成的机制。与单独使用DNase或赋形剂对照(均为0.0 [0.0 - 0.0] μl)相比,在CD1小鼠中,无论是否联合DNase,胸腔内注射tPA在6小时后均显著诱导了胸腔积液积聚(单独使用tPA:中位数[四分位间距],53.5 [30 - 355] μl)。胸腔内注射链激酶和尿激酶后也出现了液体诱导现象,表明存在类效应。胸腔积液单核细胞趋化蛋白(MCP)-1水平与积液量密切相关(r = 0.7302;P = 0.003),且显著高于相应血清中的MCP-1水平。用抗MCP-1抗体(P < 0.0001)或MCP-1受体拮抗剂(P = 0.0049)治疗的小鼠,tPA诱导的胸腔积液形成显著减少(最多减少85%)。我们的数据表明,MCP-1是tPA诱导液体积聚的关键分子。MCP-1在其他渗出性积液形成中的作用值得研究。