Xie Jing, Poole Elizabeth M, Terry Kathryn L, Fung Teresa T, Rosner Bernard A, Willett Walter C, Tworoger Shelley S
Channing Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 181 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
J Ovarian Res. 2014 Dec 5;7:112. doi: 10.1186/s13048-014-0112-4.
Several dietary indices have been developed to measure overall diet quality, including the Healthy Eating Index-2005 (HEI-2005), which measures adherence to the 2005 Dietary Guidelines from the USDA; the Alternative Healthy Eating Index-2010 (AHEI-2010), which is based on foods and nutrients predictive of chronic disease risk; and the Alternate Mediterranean Diet Score (aMDS), which is an index that characterizes traditional food patterns of Mediterranean countries. Few studies have evaluated diet quality and ovarian cancer risk.
We assessed the associations of the HEI-2005, AHEI-2010, and aMDS with risk of epithelial ovarian cancer prospectively among women in the Nurses' Health Study. We used Cox proportional hazards models, adjusting for known ovarian cancer risk factors.
During 24 years of follow-up, we documented 696 incident epithelial ovarian cancer cases among 82,948 women with diet information. The multivariate adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence interval; Ptrend) of epithelial ovarian cancer comparing the highest with the lowest quintile were 1.03 (0.80-1.34; 0.77) for the AHEI-2010, 0.85 (0.65-1.12; 0.57) for the HEI-2005, and 0.91 (0.71-1.18; 0.44) for the aMDS.
We did not observe any clear association of three diet quality scores with ovarian cancer risk. Further work should other metrics of evaluating diet quality that may be more relevant cancer risk.
已开发出多种饮食指数来衡量总体饮食质量,包括健康饮食指数-2005(HEI-2005),用于衡量对美国农业部2005年饮食指南的遵循情况;替代健康饮食指数-2010(AHEI-2010),其基于预测慢性病风险的食物和营养素;以及替代地中海饮食评分(aMDS),这是一种表征地中海国家传统食物模式的指数。很少有研究评估饮食质量与卵巢癌风险之间的关系。
我们在护士健康研究中前瞻性地评估了HEI-2005、AHEI-2010和aMDS与上皮性卵巢癌风险之间的关联。我们使用Cox比例风险模型,并对已知的卵巢癌风险因素进行了调整。
在24年的随访期间,我们在82948名有饮食信息的女性中记录了696例上皮性卵巢癌病例。将最高五分位数与最低五分位数相比,上皮性卵巢癌的多变量调整风险比(95%置信区间;P趋势)对于AHEI-2010为1.03(0.80-1.34;0.77),对于HEI-2005为0.85(0.65-1.12;0.57),对于aMDS为0.91(0.71-1.18;0.44)。
我们未观察到三种饮食质量评分与卵巢癌风险之间存在任何明确关联。应开展进一步研究,以评估可能与癌症风险更相关的其他饮食质量指标。