Am J Epidemiol. 2022 Aug 22;191(9):1584-1600. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwac082.
Few prospective studies have examined associations between diet quality and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), or comprehensively compared diet quality indices. We conducted a prospective analysis of adherence to the Healthy Eating Index (HEI)-2015, alternative HEI-2010, alternate Mediterranean diet (aMed), and 2 versions of Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH; Fung and Mellen) and PDAC within the National Institutes of Health (NIH)-AARP Diet and Health Study (United States, 1995-2011). The dietary quality indices were calculated using responses from a 124-item food frequency questionnaire completed by 535,824 participants (315,780 men and 220,044 women). We used Cox proportional hazards regression models to calculate adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for each diet quality index and PDAC. During follow-up through 2011 (15.5-year median), 3,137 incident PDAC cases were identified. Compared with those with the lowest adherence quintile, participants with the highest adherence to the HEI-2015 (HR = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.75, 0.94), aMed (HR = 0.82, 95% CI: 0.73, 0.93), DASH-Fung (HR = 0.85, 95% CI: 0.77, 0.95), and DASH-Mellen (HR = 0.86, 95% CI: 0.77, 0.96) had a statistically significant, lower PDAC risk; this was not found for the alternative HEI-2010 (HR = 0.93, 95% CI: 0.83, 1.04). This prospective observational study supports the hypothesis that greater adherence to the HEI-2015, aMed, and DASH dietary recommendations may reduce PDAC.
很少有前瞻性研究检查饮食质量与胰腺导管腺癌 (PDAC) 之间的关联,或全面比较饮食质量指数。我们在美国国立卫生研究院 (NIH)-AARP 饮食与健康研究 (1995-2011 年) 中进行了一项关于遵守健康饮食指数 (HEI)-2015、替代 HEI-2010、替代地中海饮食 (aMed) 和 2 种高血压饮食方法 (DASH; Fung 和 Mellen) 与 PDAC 之间关联的前瞻性分析。使用 535824 名参与者(315780 名男性和 220044 名女性)完成的 124 项食物频率问卷的回答计算了饮食质量指数。我们使用 Cox 比例风险回归模型计算了每个饮食质量指数与 PDAC 的调整后的风险比 (HR) 和 95%置信区间 (CI)。在 2011 年之前的随访期间(中位数为 15.5 年),发现了 3137 例 PDAC 病例。与依从性最低五分位数的参与者相比,HEI-2015 依从性最高的参与者 (HR = 0.84,95%CI:0.75,0.94)、aMed (HR = 0.82,95%CI:0.73,0.93)、DASH-Fung (HR = 0.85,95%CI:0.77,0.95) 和 DASH-Mellen (HR = 0.86,95%CI:0.77,0.96) 的 PDAC 风险显著降低;而替代 HEI-2010 的结果并非如此 (HR = 0.93,95%CI:0.83,1.04)。这项前瞻性观察研究支持以下假设,即更大程度地遵守 HEI-2015、aMed 和 DASH 饮食建议可能会降低 PDAC 的风险。