Division of Urology, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Department of Urology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2015 Mar;82-83:38-46. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2014.11.019. Epub 2014 Dec 2.
The treatment of severe urethral stenosis has always been a challenge even for skilled urologists. Classic urethroplasty, skin flaps and buccal mucosa grafting may not be used for long and complex strictures. In the quest for an ideal urethral substitute, acellular scaffolds have demonstrated the ability to induce tissue regeneration layer by layer. After several experimental studies, the use of acellular matrices for urethral reconstruction has become a clinical reality over the last decade. In this review we analyze advantages and limitations of both biological and polymeric scaffolds that have been reported in experimental and human studies. Important aspects such as graft extension, surgical technique and cell-seeding versus cell-free grafts will be discussed.
严重尿道狭窄的治疗一直是一个挑战,即使是熟练的泌尿科医生也不例外。经典的尿道成形术、皮瓣和颊黏膜移植可能不适用于长而复杂的狭窄。为了寻找理想的尿道替代物,去细胞支架已经证明了能够逐层诱导组织再生的能力。经过几项实验研究,在过去十年中,去细胞基质在尿道重建中的应用已成为临床现实。在这篇综述中,我们分析了在实验和人体研究中报道的生物和聚合物支架的优缺点。将讨论诸如移植物扩展、手术技术以及细胞接种与无细胞移植物等重要方面。