Rebar Amanda L, Ram Nilam, Conroy David E
The Pennsylvania State University, Department of Kinesiology ; Central Queensland University, School of Human, Health, and Social Sciences.
The Pennsylvania State University, Department of Human Development and Family Studies.
Psychol Sport Exerc. 2015 Mar 1;16(3):96-105. doi: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2014.09.008.
The Single-Category Implicit Association Test (SC-IAT) has been used as a method for assessing automatic evaluations of physical activity, but measurement artifact or consciously-held attitudes could be confounding the outcome scores of these measures. The objective of these two studies was to address these measurement concerns by testing the validity of a novel SC-IAT scoring technique.
Study 1 was a cross-sectional study, and study 2 was a prospective study.
In study 1, undergraduate students ( = 104) completed SC-IATs for physical activity, flowers, and sedentary behavior. In study 2, undergraduate students ( = 91) completed a SC-IAT for physical activity, self-reported affective and instrumental attitudes toward physical activity, physical activity intentions, and wore an accelerometer for two weeks. The EZ-diffusion model was used to decompose the SC-IAT into three process component scores including the information processing efficiency score.
In study 1, a series of structural equation model comparisons revealed that the information processing score did not share variability across distinct SC-IATs, suggesting it does not represent systematic measurement artifact. In study 2, the information processing efficiency score was shown to be unrelated to self-reported affective and instrumental attitudes toward physical activity, and positively related to physical activity behavior, above and beyond the traditional D-score of the SC-IAT.
The information processing efficiency score is a valid measure of automatic evaluations of physical activity.
单类别内隐联想测验(SC-IAT)已被用作评估对身体活动的自动评价的一种方法,但测量伪迹或有意识持有的态度可能会混淆这些测量的结果分数。这两项研究的目的是通过测试一种新颖的SC-IAT评分技术的有效性来解决这些测量问题。
研究1为横断面研究,研究2为前瞻性研究。
在研究1中,104名本科生完成了针对身体活动、花卉和久坐行为的SC-IAT。在研究2中,91名本科生完成了针对身体活动的SC-IAT、自我报告的对身体活动的情感和工具性态度、身体活动意图,并佩戴加速度计两周。EZ扩散模型被用于将SC-IAT分解为三个过程成分分数,包括信息处理效率分数。
在研究1中,一系列结构方程模型比较表明,信息处理分数在不同的SC-IAT之间不存在共享变异性,这表明它不代表系统性测量伪迹。在研究2中,信息处理效率分数被证明与自我报告的对身体活动的情感和工具性态度无关,并且在SC-IAT的传统D分数之外,与身体活动行为呈正相关。
信息处理效率分数是对身体活动自动评价的有效测量指标。