• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

前列腺癌主动监测的五年随访:基于加拿大社区的泌尿外科经验。

Five-year follow-up of active surveillance for prostate cancer: A Canadian community-based urological experience.

作者信息

Matthew Andrews J, Ashfield James E, Morse Michael, Whelan Thomas F

机构信息

Department of Urology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS;

Department of Urology, Dalhousie University, Saint John, NB.

出版信息

Can Urol Assoc J. 2014 Nov;8(11-12):E768-74. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.2186.

DOI:10.5489/cuaj.2186
PMID:25485002
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4250239/
Abstract

INTRODUCTON

We assessed oncological outcomes of active surveillance (AS) using a community database and identified factors associated with disease reclassification on surveillance biopsy.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed on 200 men on AS. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) was measured every 3 to 6 months. Prostate biopsies were performed every 1 to 4 years, and at the individual physician's discretion. Disease reclassification was defined as clinical T1 to cT2 progression, or histologically as >2 cores positive, Gleason score >6, or >50% core involvement on surveillance biopsy. Multivariate Cox regression analysis evaluated factors associated with disease reclassification. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were plotted.

RESULTS

We assessed a heterogeneous cohort of 86 patients, with a median age 67.2 years, who received ≥1 surveillance biopsies. The median follow-up was 5.2 years. The median times to first and second surveillance biopsies were 730 and 763 days, respectively. Overall, 47% of patients were reclassified on surveillance biopsy after a median 2.1 years. Factors associated with disease reclassification were PSA density >0.20 (p < 0.0001, hazard ratio [HR] 4.55, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.116-9.782) and ≥3 positive cores (p = 0.0152, HR 3.956, 95% CI 1.304-12.003) at diagnosis, and number of positive cores on surveillance biopsy. In total, 25 (29%) patients received delayed intervention, with a median time to intervention of 2.6 years. The median time on AS was 4.4 years, with an overall survival of 95% and prostate-specific survival of 100%.

CONCLUSIONS

Our community study supports AS to reduce over-treatment of prostate cancer. PSA density >0.20 and ≥3 cores positive are associated with disease reclassification on surveillance biopsy.

摘要

引言

我们使用社区数据库评估了主动监测(AS)的肿瘤学结果,并确定了监测活检时疾病重新分类的相关因素。

方法

对200名接受主动监测的男性进行了回顾性研究。每3至6个月测量一次前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)。每1至4年进行一次前列腺活检,具体时间由医生自行决定。疾病重新分类定义为临床T1至cT2进展,或组织学上为监测活检时>2个核心阳性、Gleason评分>6或核心受累>50%。多变量Cox回归分析评估了与疾病重新分类相关的因素。绘制了Kaplan-Meier生存曲线。

结果

我们评估了86名患者的异质性队列,中位年龄为67.2岁,这些患者接受了≥1次监测活检。中位随访时间为5.2年。首次和第二次监测活检的中位时间分别为730天和763天。总体而言,47%的患者在中位2.1年后监测活检时被重新分类。与疾病重新分类相关的因素包括诊断时PSA密度>0.20(p<0.0001,风险比[HR]4.55,95%置信区间[CI]2.116-9.782)和≥3个阳性核心(p=0.0152,HR 3.956,95%CI 1.304-12.003),以及监测活检时的阳性核心数量。共有25名(29%)患者接受了延迟干预,干预的中位时间为2.6年。主动监测的中位时间为4.4年,总生存率为95%,前列腺特异性生存率为100%。

结论

我们的社区研究支持主动监测以减少前列腺癌的过度治疗。PSA密度>0.20和≥3个核心阳性与监测活检时的疾病重新分类相关。

相似文献

1
Five-year follow-up of active surveillance for prostate cancer: A Canadian community-based urological experience.前列腺癌主动监测的五年随访:基于加拿大社区的泌尿外科经验。
Can Urol Assoc J. 2014 Nov;8(11-12):E768-74. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.2186.
2
Compliance Rates with the Prostate Cancer Research International Active Surveillance (PRIAS) Protocol and Disease Reclassification in Noncompliers.符合前列腺癌研究国际主动监测(PRIAS)方案的比例和不遵守方案者的疾病再分类。
Eur Urol. 2015 Nov;68(5):814-21. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.06.012. Epub 2015 Jun 29.
3
Active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer worldwide: the PRIAS study.全球低危前列腺癌的主动监测:PRIAS 研究。
Eur Urol. 2013 Apr;63(4):597-603. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.11.005. Epub 2012 Nov 12.
4
Eleven-year management of prostate cancer patients on active surveillance: what have we learned?前列腺癌患者11年的主动监测管理:我们学到了什么?
Tumori. 2017 Sep 18;103(5):464-474. doi: 10.5301/tj.5000649. Epub 2017 Jun 14.
5
Biopsy features associated with prostate cancer progression in active surveillance patients: comparison of three statistical models.主动监测患者中与前列腺癌进展相关的活检特征:三种统计模型的比较。
BJU Int. 2013 Apr;111(4):574-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11127.x. Epub 2012 May 4.
6
Serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) concentration is positively associated with rate of disease reclassification on subsequent active surveillance prostate biopsy in men with low PSA density.血清前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)浓度与低 PSA 密度男性后续主动监测前列腺活检中疾病再分类的速率呈正相关。
BJU Int. 2014 Apr;113(4):561-7. doi: 10.1111/bju.12131. Epub 2013 Jun 7.
7
A negative confirmatory biopsy among men on active surveillance for prostate cancer does not protect them from histologic grade progression.对于接受前列腺癌主动监测的男性,阴性确认性活检并不能保护他们免于组织学分级进展。
Eur Urol. 2014 Sep;66(3):406-13. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.04.038. Epub 2013 May 2.
8
Predictors of unfavourable repeat biopsy results in men participating in a prospective active surveillance program.参与前瞻性主动监测项目的男性中,预测不利重复活检结果的因素。
Eur Urol. 2012 Feb;61(2):370-7. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.06.027. Epub 2011 Jun 24.
9
Population-based study of grade progression in patients who harboured Gleason 3 + 3.基于人群的研究显示,存在 Gleason 3+3 的患者出现分级进展。
World J Urol. 2017 Nov;35(11):1689-1699. doi: 10.1007/s00345-017-2047-z. Epub 2017 May 12.
10
Predicting Biopsy Outcomes During Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer: External Validation of the Canary Prostate Active Surveillance Study Risk Calculators in Five Large Active Surveillance Cohorts.在前列腺癌主动监测期间预测活检结果:Canary 前列腺主动监测研究风险计算器在五个大型主动监测队列中的外部验证。
Eur Urol. 2019 Nov;76(5):693-702. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.07.041. Epub 2019 Aug 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Analysis of active surveillance uptake for low-risk localized prostate cancer in Canada: a Canadian multi-institutional study.加拿大低风险局限性前列腺癌主动监测的应用分析:一项加拿大多机构研究。
World J Urol. 2017 Apr;35(4):595-603. doi: 10.1007/s00345-016-1897-0. Epub 2016 Jul 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Prostate cancer, version 2.2014.前列腺癌临床实践指南(2014 年版)
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2014 May;12(5):686-718. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2014.0072.
2
Pathological outcomes in men with low risk and very low risk prostate cancer: implications on the practice of active surveillance.低危和极低危前列腺癌男性的病理结局:对主动监测实践的影响。
J Urol. 2013 Oct;190(4):1218-22. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.04.071. Epub 2013 Apr 30.
3
Active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer worldwide: the PRIAS study.全球低危前列腺癌的主动监测:PRIAS 研究。
Eur Urol. 2013 Apr;63(4):597-603. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.11.005. Epub 2012 Nov 12.
4
Prostate cancer mortality following active surveillance versus immediate radical prostatectomy.主动监测与即刻根治性前列腺切除术治疗后前列腺癌死亡率。
Clin Cancer Res. 2012 Oct 1;18(19):5471-8. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-1502. Epub 2012 Sep 24.
5
Temporal trends in cause of death among Swedish and US men with prostate cancer.瑞典和美国男性前列腺癌患者死因的时间趋势。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2012 Sep 5;104(17):1335-42. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djs299. Epub 2012 Jul 25.
6
Identifying candidates for active surveillance: an evaluation of the repeat biopsy strategy for men with favorable risk prostate cancer.确定主动监测的候选者:对具有低危前列腺癌风险男性进行重复活检策略的评估。
J Urol. 2012 Sep;188(3):762-7. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.04.107. Epub 2012 Jul 19.
7
Radical prostatectomy versus observation for localized prostate cancer.根治性前列腺切除术与观察等待治疗局限性前列腺癌的比较。
N Engl J Med. 2012 Jul 19;367(3):203-13. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1113162.
8
Screening for prostate cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.前列腺癌筛查:美国预防服务工作组推荐声明。
Ann Intern Med. 2012 Jul 17;157(2):120-34. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-157-2-201207170-00459.
9
Active surveillance for prostate cancer: a systematic review of the literature.前列腺癌的主动监测:文献系统评价。
Eur Urol. 2012 Dec;62(6):976-83. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.05.072. Epub 2012 Jun 7.
10
Pathologic prostate cancer characteristics in patients eligible for active surveillance: a head-to-head comparison of contemporary protocols.适合主动监测的患者的前列腺癌病理学特征:当代方案的头对头比较。
Eur Urol. 2012 Sep;62(3):462-8. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.03.011. Epub 2012 Mar 17.