Hosseini S Mohsen, Boright Andrew P, Sun Lei, Canty Angelo J, Bull Shelley B, Klein Barbara E K, Klein Ronald, Paterson Andrew D
Genetics and Genome Biology Program, The Hospital for Sick Children, Peter Gilgan Centre for Research and Learning, Rm 12.9835, 686 Bay Street, Toronto, ON, M5G 0A4, Canada,
Hum Genet. 2015 Feb;134(2):247-57. doi: 10.1007/s00439-014-1517-2. Epub 2014 Dec 7.
We investigated the association of signals from previous GWAS and candidate gene meta-analyses for diabetic retinopathy (DR) or nephropathy (DN), as well as an EPO variant in meta-analyses of severe (SDR) and mild diabetic retinopathy (MDR). Meta-analyses of SDR (≥severe non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) or history of panretinal photocoagulation) and MDR (≥mild NPDR), defined based on seven-field stereoscopic fundus photographs, were performed in two well-characterized type 1 diabetes (T1D) cohorts: the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial/Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (DCCT/EDIC, n = 1,304) and Wisconsin Epidemiologic Study of Diabetic Retinopathy (WESDR, n = 603). Among 34 previous signals for DR, after controlling for multiple testing, no association was replicated in our meta-analyses. rs1571942 and rs12219125 at PLXDC2 locus showed nominally significant (<0.05) association with SDR in the same direction as previous report, as did rs1801282 in PPARG gene with MDR. Among 55 loci previously associated with DN, three showed suggestive associations with SDR in our study without maintaining significance after correction for multiple testing. Of particular interest, rs1617640 (EPO) was not significantly associated with DR status, combined SDR-DN phenotype, time to SDR or time to DN (all P > 0.05). Lack of replication of previous DR hits and EPO despite reasonable statistical power implies that many of these may be false positives. Consistent with pleiotropy, we provide suggestive collective evidence for association between DR and variants previously associated with DN without reaching statistical significance at any single locus.
我们研究了既往全基因组关联研究(GWAS)信号以及糖尿病视网膜病变(DR)或肾病(DN)候选基因荟萃分析之间的关联,以及严重(SDR)和轻度糖尿病视网膜病变(MDR)荟萃分析中的一种促红细胞生成素(EPO)变体。基于七视野立体眼底照片定义的SDR(≥严重非增殖性糖尿病视网膜病变(NPDR)或全视网膜光凝病史)和MDR(≥轻度NPDR)的荟萃分析,在两个特征明确的1型糖尿病(T1D)队列中进行:糖尿病控制与并发症试验/糖尿病干预与并发症流行病学研究(DCCT/EDIC,n = 1304)和威斯康星糖尿病视网膜病变流行病学研究(WESDR,n = 603)。在既往34个DR信号中,在控制多重检验后,我们的荟萃分析未重复发现关联。PLXDC2基因座的rs1571942和rs12219125与SDR显示出名义上显著(<0.05)的关联,方向与既往报告相同,PPARG基因中的rs1801282与MDR的关联也是如此。在既往与DN相关的55个基因座中,有三个在我们的研究中显示出与SDR有提示性关联,但在多重检验校正后未保持显著性。特别值得注意的是,rs1617640(EPO)与DR状态、合并的SDR-DN表型、发生SDR的时间或发生DN的时间均无显著关联(所有P>0.05)。尽管有合理的统计效力,但既往DR关联信号和EPO未被重复,这意味着其中许多可能是假阳性。与基因多效性一致,我们提供了提示性的综合证据,表明DR与既往与DN相关的变体之间存在关联,但在任何单个基因座均未达到统计学显著性。