Suppr超能文献

住院后在养老院的中期护理:一项为期一年随访的随机对照试验

Intermediate care in nursing home after hospital admission: a randomized controlled trial with one year follow-up.

作者信息

Herfjord Jo Kåre, Heggestad Torhild, Ersland Håkon, Ranhoff Anette Hylen

机构信息

Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen and Kavli Research Centre for Geriatrics and Dementia, Haraldsplass Hospital, Ulriksdal 8, 5009 Bergen, Norway.

出版信息

BMC Res Notes. 2014 Dec 9;7:889. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-7-889.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Intermediate care is intended to reduce hospital admissions and facilitate early discharge. In Norway, a model was developed with transfer to intermediate care shortly after hospital admission. Efficacy and safety of this model have not been studied previously.In a parallel-group randomized controlled trial, patients over 70 years living at home before admission were eligible if clinically stable, without need for surgical treatment and deemed suited for intermediate care by attending physician. Intervention group patients were transferred to a nursing home unit with increased staff and multidisciplinary assessment, for a maximum stay of three weeks. Patients in the control group received usual care in hospital. Blinding to group assignment was not possible.The primary outcome was number of days living at home in a follow-up period of 365 days. Secondary outcomes were mortality, hospital admissions, need for residential care and home care services. Data were obtained from patient records and registers.

RESULTS

376 patients were included, 74% female and mean age 84 years. There was no significant differences between intervention (n=190) and control group (n=186) for number of days living at home (253.7 vs 256.5, p=0.80) or days in hospital (10.4 vs 10.5, p=0.748). Intervention group patients spent less time in nursing home (40.6 days vs. 55.0, p=0.046), and more patients lived independently without home health care services (31.6% vs 19.9%, p=0.007). For orthopaedic patients (n=128), mortality was higher in the intervention group; 15 intervention patients and 7 controls died (25.1% vs 10.3%, p=0.049). There was no significant difference in one-year mortality for medical patients (n=150) or the total study population.

CONCLUSIONS

This model of rapid transfer to intermediate care did not significantly influence number of days living at home during one year follow-up, but reduced demand for nursing home care and need for home health care services. In post-hoc analysis mortality was increased for orthopedic patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The trial was registered 26. July 2013 at Current Controlled Trials and assigned with registration number ISRCTN21608185.

摘要

背景

过渡性护理旨在减少医院住院人数并促进早期出院。在挪威,开发了一种在患者入院后不久即转至过渡性护理的模式。此前尚未对该模式的疗效和安全性进行研究。

在一项平行组随机对照试验中,入院前居家生活的70岁以上患者,若临床状况稳定、无需手术治疗且经主治医生判定适合过渡性护理,则符合入选条件。干预组患者被转至一个人员配备增加且有多学科评估的养老院单元,最长停留三周。对照组患者在医院接受常规护理。无法对分组情况进行盲法处理。

主要结局是在365天的随访期内居家生活的天数。次要结局包括死亡率、住院次数、对机构护理和家庭护理服务的需求。数据来自患者记录和登记册。

结果

共纳入376例患者,其中74%为女性,平均年龄84岁。干预组(n = 190)和对照组(n = 186)在居家生活天数(253.7天对256.5天,p = 0.80)或住院天数(10.4天对10.5天,p = 0.748)方面无显著差异。干预组患者在养老院的停留时间较短(40.6天对55.0天,p = 0.046),且更多患者无需家庭医疗保健服务即可独立生活(31.6%对19.9%,p = 0.007)。对于骨科患者(n = 128),干预组的死亡率较高;15例干预组患者和7例对照组患者死亡(25.1%对10.3%,p = 0.049)。内科患者(n = 150)或整个研究人群的一年死亡率无显著差异。

结论

这种快速转至过渡性护理的模式在一年随访期间对居家生活天数没有显著影响,但减少了对养老院护理的需求以及对家庭医疗保健服务的需求。事后分析显示骨科患者的死亡率有所增加。

试验注册

该试验于2013年7月26日在“当前受控试验”注册,注册号为ISRCTN21608185。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be3c/4295396/02f78330c10a/13104_2014_3392_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验