Agaku Israel T, Obadan Enihomo M, Odukoya Oluwakemi O, Olufajo Olubode
1 Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Center for Global Tobacco Control, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA
2 Department of Oral Health Policy and Epidemiology, Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Eur J Public Health. 2015 Apr;25(2):210-5. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/cku203. Epub 2014 Dec 8.
Preventing tobacco use is a key aspect of health promotion during adolescence. We assessed prevalence and impact of school-based tobacco prevention programs in 43 countries.
We performed a secondary analysis of national data of students aged 13-15 years (Global Youth Tobacco Surveys) from 43 countries during 2005-2011. National surveys of the corresponding school personnel (Global School Personnel Surveys) were performed in each country during the same year as the student surveys. Data on status of enforcement of national smoke-free school policies were obtained from the 2008 and 2009 WHO MPOWER reports. Logistic regression was used to measure ecologic-level associations between school-based tobacco prevention programs and tobacco-related knowledge and behaviour among students (P < 0.05).
The proportion of students who were taught in class about the dangers of tobacco use during the school year ranged from 31.4% (Georgia) to 83.4% (Papua New Guinea). For every 10% increase (country level) in the proportion of teachers who reported having a tobacco prevention curriculum in their school, the odds of students reporting exposure to education in class about the dangers of tobacco increased by 6.0% (AOR = 1.06; 95% CI: 1.04-1.08). However, didactic education in class about the dangers of tobacco use was not independently associated with student current cigarette smoking behavior. Conversely, the likelihood of being a current smoker was significantly lower among students in countries with moderate/strongly enforced national smoke-free school policies compared with those in countries with poorly enforced/no national smoke-free school policies (AOR = 0.59; 95% CI: 0.45-0.76).
Comprehensive tobacco prevention programs that include well-enforced smoke-free school policies may help reduce youth smoking.
预防烟草使用是青少年健康促进的关键方面。我们评估了43个国家基于学校的烟草预防项目的普及率及其影响。
我们对2005年至2011年期间43个国家13至15岁学生的全国性数据(全球青少年烟草调查)进行了二次分析。在与学生调查同年,对每个国家相应的学校工作人员进行了全国性调查(全球学校工作人员调查)。从2008年和2009年世界卫生组织MPOWER报告中获取国家无烟学校政策的执行状况数据。采用逻辑回归分析来衡量基于学校的烟草预防项目与学生烟草相关知识和行为之间的生态水平关联(P < 0.05)。
在学年期间在课堂上接受过烟草使用危害教育的学生比例从31.4%(格鲁吉亚)到83.4%(巴布亚新几内亚)不等。在学校里报告有烟草预防课程的教师比例每增加10%(国家层面),报告在课堂上接受过烟草危害教育的学生比例增加6.0%(调整后比值比 = 1.06;95%置信区间:1.04 - 1.08)。然而,课堂上关于烟草使用危害的说教式教育与学生当前吸烟行为并无独立关联。相反,与国家无烟学校政策执行不力/没有国家无烟学校政策的国家相比,在国家无烟学校政策执行适度/有力的国家,当前吸烟者的可能性显著更低(调整后比值比 = 0.59;95%置信区间:0.45 - 0.76)。
包括有力执行的无烟学校政策在内的全面烟草预防项目可能有助于减少青少年吸烟。