Suppr超能文献

琥乙红霉素与复方磺胺甲恶唑治疗百日咳的比较。

Comparison of erythromycin ethylsuccinate and co-trimoxazole for treatment of pertussis.

作者信息

Hoppe J E, Halm U, Hagedorn H J, Kraminer-Hagedorn A

机构信息

Universitätskinderklinik, Tübingen.

出版信息

Infection. 1989 Jul-Aug;17(4):227-31. doi: 10.1007/BF01639525.

Abstract

Fifty-five ambulatory children with early culture-proven pertussis were treated for two weeks either with erythromycin ethylsuccinate (n = 28) (50-80 mg/kg/day in three doses during meals) or with co-trimoxazole (n = 27) (6-10 mg trimethoprim/kg/day in two doses after meals). After completion of treatment, all patients in the erythromycin group were culture-negative, while in the co-trimoxazole group one child was still culture-positive. In this case vomiting may have played a role. Both agents appear to be able to eradicate Bordetella pertussis from the nasopharynx of patients with early whooping cough.

摘要

55名经早期培养证实患有百日咳的门诊儿童接受了为期两周的治疗,其中28名儿童接受琥乙红霉素治疗(剂量为50 - 80mg/kg/天,分三次随餐服用),27名儿童接受复方新诺明治疗(剂量为甲氧苄啶6 - 10mg/kg/天,分两次餐后服用)。治疗结束后,红霉素组所有患者培养结果均为阴性,而复方新诺明组有一名儿童培养结果仍为阳性。在这种情况下,呕吐可能起到了一定作用。两种药物似乎都能够从早期百日咳患者的鼻咽部清除百日咳博德特氏菌。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验