Suppr超能文献

在关岛和塞班岛的槟榔咀嚼者中筛查口腔潜在恶性疾病。

Screening for oral potentially malignant disorders among areca (betel) nut chewers in Guam and Saipan.

作者信息

Paulino Yvette C, Hurwitz Eric L, Warnakulasuriya Saman, Gatewood Robert R, Pierson Kenneth D, Tenorio Lynnette F, Novotny Rachel, Palafox Neal A, Wilkens Lynne R, Badowski Grazyna

机构信息

Cancer Research Center of Guam, University of Guam, UOG Station, Mangilao, GU, USA.

出版信息

BMC Oral Health. 2014 Dec 11;14:151. doi: 10.1186/1472-6831-14-151.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Mariana Islands, including Guam and Saipan, are home to many ethnic subpopulations of Micronesia. Oral cancer incidence rates vary among subpopulations, and areca (betel) nut chewing, a habit with carcinogenic risks, is common. Our objectives were to conduct a screening program to detect oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMD) in betel nut chewers, measure their betel nut chewing practices, and assess the prevalence of the oral human papillomavirus (HPV) infection in a subset of betel nut chewers in these islands.

METHODS

A cross-section of 300 betel nut chewers ≥18 years old [in Guam (n = 137) and in Saipan (n = 163)] were recruited between January 2011-June 2012. We collected demographic, socioeconomic, and oral behavioural characteristics. Latent class analysis was used to identify chewing patterns from selected chewing behaviours. Following calibration of OPMD against an expert, a registered oral hygienist conducted oral examinations by house to house visits and referred positive cases to the study dentist for a second oral examination. Buccal smears were collected from a subset (n = 123) for HPV testing.

RESULTS

Two classes of betel nut chewers were identified on 7 betel nut behaviours, smoking, and alcohol use; a key difference between the two Classes was the addition of ingredients to the betel quid among those in Class 2. When compared on other characteristics, Class 1 chewers were older, had been chewing for more years, and chewed fewer nuts per day although chewing episodes lasted longer than Class 2 chewers. More Class 1 chewers visited the dentist regularly than Class 2 chewers. Of the 300 participants, 46 (15.3%; 3.8% for Class 1 and 19.4% for Class 2) had OPMD and one (0.3%) was confirmed to have squamous cell carcinoma. The prevalence of oral HPV was 5.7% (7/123), although none were high-risk types.

CONCLUSIONS

We found two patterns of betel nut chewing behaviour; Class 2 had a higher frequency of OPMD. Additional epidemiologic research is needed to examine the relationship between pattern of chewing behaviours and oral cancer incidence. Based on risk stratification, oral screening in Guam and Saipan can be targeted to Class 2 chewers.

摘要

背景

包括关岛和塞班岛在内的马里亚纳群岛是密克罗尼西亚多个族裔亚群体的家园。口腔癌发病率在不同亚群体中有所差异,嚼槟榔这种具有致癌风险的习惯很常见。我们的目标是开展一项筛查计划,以检测嚼槟榔者中的口腔潜在恶性疾病(OPMD),测量他们的嚼槟榔习惯,并评估这些岛屿上一部分嚼槟榔者口腔人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)感染的患病率。

方法

在2011年1月至2012年6月期间招募了300名年龄≥18岁的嚼槟榔者(关岛137名,塞班岛163名)。我们收集了人口统计学、社会经济和口腔行为特征。使用潜在类别分析从选定的咀嚼行为中识别咀嚼模式。在由专家对OPMD进行校准后,一名注册口腔保健员逐户进行口腔检查,并将阳性病例转介给研究牙医进行第二次口腔检查。从一部分人(n = 123)中采集颊部涂片进行HPV检测。

结果

根据7种槟榔咀嚼行为、吸烟和饮酒情况,识别出两类嚼槟榔者;两类之间的一个关键差异是第2类嚼槟榔者在槟榔块中添加了配料。在其他特征方面进行比较时,第1类嚼槟榔者年龄较大,嚼槟榔的年数更多,每天嚼的槟榔较少,不过每次咀嚼的时间比第2类嚼槟榔者长。第1类嚼槟榔者比第2类嚼槟榔者更经常看牙医。在300名参与者中,46名(15.3%;第1类为3.8%,第2类为19.4%)患有OPMD,1名(0.3%)被确诊患有鳞状细胞癌。口腔HPV的患病率为5.7%(7/123),不过均为低风险类型。

结论

我们发现了两种槟榔咀嚼行为模式;第2类嚼槟榔者的OPMD发生率较高。需要进一步开展流行病学研究,以考察咀嚼行为模式与口腔癌发病率之间的关系。基于风险分层,关岛和塞班岛的口腔筛查可以针对第2类嚼槟榔者。

相似文献

1
3
Betel nut chewing, oral premalignant lesions, and the oral microbiome.
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 22;12(2):e0172196. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172196. eCollection 2017.
5
Areca (Betel) Nut Chewing Practices in Micronesian Populations.
Hawaii J Public Health. 2011 Mar;3(1):19-29.
7
Oral Screening for Pre-cancerous Lesions Among Areca-nut Chewing Population from Rural India.
Oral Health Prev Dent. 2015;13(6):509-14. doi: 10.3290/j.ohpd.a34052.
10
The profound oral cavity cancer burden in the United States Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands: A global health opportunity.
Am J Otolaryngol. 2019 Nov-Dec;40(6):102267. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2019.07.011. Epub 2019 Jul 19.

引用本文的文献

2
Facilitator experiences and lessons learned from the Betel nut intervention trial (BENIT).
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jan 24;24(1):288. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-17788-4.
3
Role of Betel Nut in Liver Toxicity in Oral Submucous Fibrosis and Oral Cancer Patients: A Case-Control Study.
Cureus. 2023 Nov 9;15(11):e48562. doi: 10.7759/cureus.48562. eCollection 2023 Nov.
4
Dental Health Utilization in Palau: Feasibility of an Oral Cancer Screening Program.
Ann Glob Health. 2023 Sep 20;89(1):60. doi: 10.5334/aogh.4174. eCollection 2023.
6
The Betel Nut Intervention Trial (BENIT)-A Randomized Clinical Trial for Areca Nut and Betel Quid Cessation: Primary Outcomes.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Aug 21;20(16):6622. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20166622.
7
Salivary Areca and tobacco alkaloids for bioverification in the Betel Nut Intervention Trial.
Drug Test Anal. 2023 Jan;15(1):58-65. doi: 10.1002/dta.3364. Epub 2022 Oct 2.
8
Betel quid chewing and oral potential malignant disorders and the impact of smoking and drinking: A meta-analysis.
World J Clin Cases. 2022 Apr 6;10(10):3131-3142. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i10.3131.
9
Areca Nut Chewing: Initiation, Addiction, and Harmful Effects Emphasizing the Barriers and Importance of Cessation.
J Addict. 2021 Jun 3;2021:9967097. doi: 10.1155/2021/9967097. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Areca (Betel) Nut Chewing Practices in Micronesian Populations.
Hawaii J Public Health. 2011 Mar;3(1):19-29.
2
Prevalence of oral HPV infection in the United States, 2009-2010.
JAMA. 2012 Feb 15;307(7):693-703. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.101. Epub 2012 Jan 26.
3
Smoking, alcohol, and betel quid and oral cancer: a prospective cohort study.
J Oncol. 2011;2011:525976. doi: 10.1155/2011/525976. Epub 2011 Mar 17.
5
Human papillomaviruses in oral carcinoma and oral potentially malignant disorders: a systematic review.
Oral Dis. 2011 Apr;17 Suppl 1:58-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-0825.2011.01792.x.
7
Oral cancer screening in the Bangladeshi community of Tower Hamlets: a social model.
Br J Cancer. 2009 Dec 3;101 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S68-72. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605394.
8
Cost-effectiveness of oral cancer screening: results from a cluster randomized controlled trial in India.
Bull World Health Organ. 2009 Mar;87(3):200-6. doi: 10.2471/blt.08.053231.
9
10
Oral cancer incidence disparity among ethnic groups on Guam.
Pac Health Dialog. 2005 Mar;12(1):153-4.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验