Coombs Maureen, Long-Sutehall Tracy, Darlington Anne-Sophie, Richardson Alison
Graduate School of Nursing, Midwifery and Health, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
Palliat Med. 2015 Apr;29(4):354-62. doi: 10.1177/0269216314560208. Epub 2014 Dec 17.
Dying patients would prefer to die at home, and therefore a goal of end-of-life care is to offer choice regarding where patients die. However, whether it is feasible to offer this option to patients within critical care units and whether teams are willing to consider this option has gained limited exploration internationally.
To examine current experiences of, practices in and views towards transferring patients in critical care settings home to die.
Exploratory two-stage qualitative study
SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Six focus groups were held with doctors and nurses from four intensive care units across two large hospital sites in England, general practitioners and community nurses from one community service in the south of England and members of a Patient and Public Forum. A further 15 nurses and 6 consultants from critical care units across the United Kingdom participated in follow-on telephone interviews.
The practice of transferring critically ill patients home to die is a rare event in the United Kingdom, despite the positive view of health care professionals. Challenges to service provision include patient care needs, uncertain time to death and the view that transfer to community services is a complex, highly time-dependent undertaking.
There are evidenced individual and policy drivers promoting high-quality care for all adults approaching the end of life encompassing preferred place of death. While there is evidence of this choice being honoured and delivered for some of the critical care population, it remains debatable whether this will become a conventional practice in end of life in this setting.
临终患者更倾向于在家中离世,因此临终关怀的一个目标是为患者提供关于死亡地点的选择。然而,在重症监护病房内向患者提供这一选择是否可行,以及团队是否愿意考虑这一选择,在国际上受到的探索有限。
研究在重症监护环境中将患者转至家中离世的当前经验、做法和观点。
探索性两阶段定性研究
设置/参与者:在英国两个大型医院院区的四个重症监护病房与医生和护士、英格兰南部一个社区服务机构的全科医生和社区护士以及一个患者及公众论坛的成员举行了六个焦点小组会议。来自英国各地重症监护病房的另外15名护士和6名顾问参与了后续电话访谈。
在英国,将重症患者转至家中离世的做法很少见,尽管医护人员持积极态度。提供服务面临的挑战包括患者护理需求、死亡时间不确定,以及认为转至社区服务是一项复杂且高度依赖时间的工作。
有证据表明,个人和政策驱动因素推动为所有接近生命终点的成年人提供包括首选死亡地点在内的高质量护理。虽然有证据表明这一选择在一些重症监护人群中得到了尊重和落实,但在这种情况下,这是否会成为临终时的常规做法仍存在争议。