• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两种漱口水对唾液pH值的影响。

Effect of two mouthwashes on salivary ph.

作者信息

Belardinelli Paola A, Morelatto Rosana A, Benavidez Tomás E, Baruzzi Ana M, López de Blanc Silvia A

机构信息

Department of Oral Pathology, Stomatology B, School of Dentistry, National University of Cordoba, Cordoba, Argentina.

Department of Physicalchemistry, School of Chemical Science, National University of Cordoba, Córdoba, Argentina.

出版信息

Acta Odontol Latinoam. 2014;27(2):66-71. doi: 10.1590/S1852-48342014000200004.

DOI:10.1590/S1852-48342014000200004
PMID:25523957
Abstract

To analyze the effect of two mouthwashes on salivary pH and correlate it with age, buffer capacity and saliva flow rate in healthy volunteers, a crossover phase IV clinical study involving three age-based groups was designed. Two commercial mouthwashes (MW), Cool Mint ListerineR (MWa) and Periobacter R (MWb) were used. The unstimulated saliva of each individual was first characterized by measuring flow rate, pH, and buffer capacity. Salivary pH was evaluated before rinsing with a given MW, immediately after rinsing, 5 minutes later, and then every 10 min (at 15, 25, 35 min) until the baseline pH was recovered. Paired t-test, ANOVA with a randomized block design, and Pearson correlation tests were used. Averages were 0.63 mL/min, 7.06, and 0.87 for flow rate, pH, and buffer capacity, respectively. An immediate significant increase in salivary pH was observed after rinsing, reaching average values of 7.24 (MWb) and 7.30 (MWa), which declined to an almost stable value 15 minutes. The great increase in salivary pH, after MW use shows that saliva is a dynamic system, and that the organism is capable of responding to a stimulus with changes in its composition. It is thus evident that pH of the external agent alone is not a good indicator for its erosive potential because biological systems tend to neutralize it. The results of this study enhance the importance of in vivo measurements and reinforce the concept of the protective action of saliva.

摘要

为分析两种漱口水对健康志愿者唾液pH值的影响,并将其与年龄、缓冲能力和唾液流速相关联,设计了一项涉及三个年龄组的交叉IV期临床研究。使用了两种商业漱口水(MW),即清凉薄荷味李施德林漱口水(MWa)和Periobacter漱口水(MWb)。首先通过测量流速、pH值和缓冲能力来表征每个个体的非刺激性唾液。在使用给定的漱口水冲洗前、冲洗后立即、5分钟后,然后每10分钟(在15、25、35分钟时)评估唾液pH值,直至恢复到基线pH值。使用配对t检验、随机区组设计的方差分析和Pearson相关检验。流速、pH值和缓冲能力的平均值分别为0.63 mL/分钟、7.06和0.87。冲洗后观察到唾液pH值立即显著升高,MWb和MWa的平均值分别达到7.24和7.30,15分钟后降至几乎稳定的值。使用漱口水后唾液pH值的大幅升高表明唾液是一个动态系统,并且机体能够通过其成分的变化对刺激做出反应。因此,很明显仅外部因素的pH值不是其侵蚀潜力的良好指标,因为生物系统倾向于中和它。本研究结果增强了体内测量的重要性,并强化了唾液保护作用的概念。

相似文献

1
Effect of two mouthwashes on salivary ph.两种漱口水对唾液pH值的影响。
Acta Odontol Latinoam. 2014;27(2):66-71. doi: 10.1590/S1852-48342014000200004.
2
Neutralizing salivary pH by mouthwashes after an acidic challenge.酸性刺激后用漱口水中和唾液pH值。
J Investig Clin Dent. 2017 May;8(2). doi: 10.1111/jicd.12198. Epub 2015 Nov 30.
3
The effect of antacid on salivary pH in patients with and without dental erosion after multiple acid challenges.抗酸剂对多次酸刺激后有和无牙侵蚀患者唾液pH值的影响。
Am J Dent. 2015 Apr;28(2):100-4.
4
Preliminary findings on the correlation of saliva pH, buffering capacity, flow, Consistency and Streptococcus mutans in relation to cigarette smoking.唾液pH值、缓冲能力、分泌量、黏稠度与变形链球菌的相关性以及吸烟情况的初步研究结果。
J Dent Hyg. 2013 Feb;87(1):30-7. Epub 2013 Feb 5.
5
The effects of saliva on the erosive potential of three different wines.唾液对三种不同葡萄酒侵蚀潜力的影响。
Aust Dent J. 2009 Sep;54(3):228-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2009.01124.x.
6
Impact of fluoride, milk and water rinsing on surface rehardening of acid softened enamel. An in situ study.氟化物、牛奶和水冲洗对酸蚀软化牙釉质表面再矿化的影响。一项原位研究。
Am J Dent. 2008 Apr;21(2):113-8.
7
Effect of antimicrobial mouthrinses on salivary microflora in healthy subjects.抗菌漱口水对健康受试者唾液微生物群的影响。
Scand J Dent Res. 1984 Feb;92(1):38-42.
8
Effect of an antiseptic mouthrinse on salivary microbiota.抗菌漱口水对唾液微生物群的影响。
Am J Dent. 1996 Jun;9(3):93-5.
9
Salivary buffer capacity, pH, and stimulated flow rate of crack cocaine users.可卡因吸食者的唾液缓冲能力、pH值及刺激流率
J Investig Clin Dent. 2013 Aug;4(3):160-3. doi: 10.1111/j.2041-1626.2012.00126.x. Epub 2013 Jan 10.
10
Comparative antimicrobial effectiveness of a substantive (0.12% chlorhexidine) and a nonsubstantive (phenolic) mouthrinse in vivo and in vitro.一种长效(0.12%氯己定)漱口水和一种短效(酚类)漱口水在体内和体外的抗菌效果比较
Compendium. 1994 Sep;15(9):1158, 1160, 1162 passim; quiz 1170.

引用本文的文献

1
The Effect of Oral Care Foams and a Spray on Salivary pH Changes after Exposure to Acidic Beverages in Young Adults.口腔护理泡沫和喷雾对年轻成年人饮用酸性饮料后唾液pH值变化的影响。
Dent J (Basel). 2024 Apr 3;12(4):93. doi: 10.3390/dj12040093.
2
Quantification of the Ability of Natural Products to Prevent Herpes Virus Infection.天然产物预防疱疹病毒感染能力的定量分析。
Medicines (Basel). 2020 Oct 6;7(10):64. doi: 10.3390/medicines7100064.
3
Dental Care Provision during Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic: The Importance of Continuous Support for Vulnerable Patients.
在 2019 冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行期间的口腔保健服务:为脆弱患者提供持续支持的重要性。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2020 Jun 12;56(6):294. doi: 10.3390/medicina56060294.
4
Effects of Chlorhexidine mouthwash on the oral microbiome.洗必泰含漱液对口腔微生物组的影响。
Sci Rep. 2020 Mar 24;10(1):5254. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-61912-4.
5
A Review of Selected Studies That Determine the Physical and Chemical Properties of Saliva in the Field of Dental Treatment.关于在牙科治疗领域中确定唾液物理和化学性质的部分研究综述。
Biomed Res Int. 2018 May 9;2018:6572381. doi: 10.1155/2018/6572381. eCollection 2018.
6
Plasticity of Candida albicans Biofilms.白色念珠菌生物膜的可塑性
Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2016 Jun 1;80(3):565-95. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00068-15. Print 2016 Sep.