Sage Daniel, Sircar Indraneel, Dainty Andrew, Fussey Pete, Goodier Chris
Lecturer in Organisational Behaviour at the School of Business and Economics, Loughborough University, United Kingdom.
Research Associate at the School of Politics and International Relations, Queen Mary University of London, United Kingdom.
Disasters. 2015 Jul;39(3):407-26. doi: 10.1111/disa.12114. Epub 2014 Dec 29.
The resilience of any system, human or natural, centres on its capacity to adapt its structure, but not necessarily its function, to a new configuration in response to long-term socio-ecological change. In the long term, therefore, enhancing resilience involves more than simply improving a system's ability to resist an immediate threat or to recover to a stable past state. However, despite the prevalence of adaptive notions of resilience in academic discourse, it is apparent that infrastructure planners and policies largely continue to struggle to comprehend longer-term system adaptation in their understanding of resilience. Instead, a short-term, stable system (STSS) perspective on resilience is prevalent. This paper seeks to identify and problematise this perspective, presenting research based on the development of a heuristic 'scenario-episode' tool to address, and challenge, it in the context of United Kingdom infrastructure resilience. The aim is to help resilience practitioners to understand better the capacities of future infrastructure systems to respond to natural, malicious threats.
任何系统,无论是人类系统还是自然系统,其恢复力都集中在应对长期社会生态变化时调整自身结构(而非必然是功能)以适应新形态的能力上。因此,从长远来看,增强恢复力所涉及的不仅仅是简单提高系统抵御即时威胁或恢复到稳定过去状态的能力。然而,尽管适应性恢复力概念在学术讨论中普遍存在,但很明显,基础设施规划者和政策在理解恢复力时,很大程度上仍难以领会系统的长期适应性。相反,一种关于恢复力的短期、稳定系统(STSS)视角颇为盛行。本文旨在识别并质疑这一视角,呈现基于启发式“情景 - 事件”工具开发的研究,以便在英国基础设施恢复力的背景下应对并挑战这一视角。目的是帮助恢复力从业者更好地理解未来基础设施系统应对自然和恶意威胁的能力。