Campo Joe J, Aponte John J, Skinner Jeff, Nakajima Rie, Molina Douglas M, Liang Li, Sacarlal Jahit, Alonso Pedro L, Crompton Peter D, Felgner Philip L, Dobaño Carlota
‡ISGlobal, Barcelona Ctr. Int. Health Res. (CRESIB), Hospital Clínic-Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; §Manhiça Health Research Centre, Manhiça, Mozambique;
¶Laboratory of Immunogenetics, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD;
Mol Cell Proteomics. 2015 Mar;14(3):519-31. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M114.044677. Epub 2014 Dec 29.
The leading malaria vaccine candidate, RTS,S, targets the sporozoite and liver stages of the Plasmodium falciparum life cycle, yet it provides partial protection against disease associated with the subsequent blood stage of infection. Antibodies against the vaccine target, the circumsporozoite protein, have not shown sufficient correlation with risk of clinical malaria to serve as a surrogate for protection. The mechanism by which a vaccine that targets the asymptomatic sporozoite and liver stages protects against disease caused by blood-stage parasites remains unclear. We hypothesized that vaccination with RTS,S protects from blood-stage disease by reducing the number of parasites emerging from the liver, leading to prolonged exposure to subclinical levels of blood-stage parasites that go undetected and untreated, which in turn boosts pre-existing antibody-mediated blood-stage immunity. To test this hypothesis, we compared antibody responses to 824 P. falciparum antigens by protein array in Mozambican children 6 months after receiving a full course of RTS,S (n = 291) versus comparator vaccine (n = 297) in a Phase IIb trial. Moreover, we used a nested case-control design to compare antibody responses of children who did or did not experience febrile malaria. Unexpectedly, we found that the breadth and magnitude of the antibody response to both liver and asexual blood-stage antigens was significantly lower in RTS,S vaccinees, with the exception of only four antigens, including the RTS,S circumsporozoite antigen. Contrary to our initial hypothesis, these findings suggest that RTS,S confers protection against clinical malaria by blocking sporozoite invasion of hepatocytes, thereby reducing exposure to the blood-stage parasites that cause disease. We also found that antibody profiles 6 months after vaccination did not distinguish protected and susceptible children during the subsequent 12-month follow-up period but were strongly associated with exposure. Together, these data provide insight into the mechanism by which RTS,S protects from malaria.
领先的疟疾疫苗候选物RTS,S针对恶性疟原虫生命周期的子孢子和肝脏阶段,但它对与随后感染的血液阶段相关的疾病提供部分保护。针对疫苗靶点环子孢子蛋白的抗体与临床疟疾风险之间未显示出足够的相关性,无法作为保护的替代指标。一种针对无症状子孢子和肝脏阶段的疫苗预防由血液阶段寄生虫引起的疾病的机制仍不清楚。我们假设,接种RTS,S疫苗可通过减少从肝脏中出现的寄生虫数量来预防血液阶段疾病,从而导致长期暴露于未被发现和未治疗的亚临床水平的血液阶段寄生虫,进而增强预先存在的抗体介导的血液阶段免疫力。为了验证这一假设,我们在一项IIb期试验中,比较了莫桑比克儿童在接受完整疗程的RTS,S疫苗(n = 291)与对照疫苗(n = 297)6个月后,通过蛋白质芯片对824种恶性疟原虫抗原的抗体反应。此外,我们采用嵌套病例对照设计,比较了经历或未经历发热性疟疾的儿童的抗体反应。出乎意料的是,我们发现,除了包括RTS,S环子孢子抗原在内的仅四种抗原外,RTS,S疫苗接种者对肝脏和无性血液阶段抗原的抗体反应的广度和强度显著较低。与我们最初的假设相反,这些发现表明,RTS,S通过阻断子孢子对肝细胞的侵袭来预防临床疟疾,从而减少接触导致疾病的血液阶段寄生虫。我们还发现,接种疫苗6个月后的抗体谱在随后的12个月随访期内无法区分受保护和易感儿童,但与暴露密切相关。这些数据共同为RTS,S预防疟疾的机制提供了见解。