Andreotti Jennifer, Jann Kay, Melie-Garcia Lester, Giezendanner Stéphanie, Abela Eugenio, Wiest Roland, Dierks Thomas, Federspiel Andrea
Department of Psychiatric Neurophysiology, University Hospital of Psychiatry, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Department of Psychiatric Neurophysiology, University Hospital of Psychiatry, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland; Laboratory of Functional MRI Technology, Ahmanson-Lovelace Brain Mapping Center, Department of Neurology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles California, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2014 Dec 30;9(12):e115503. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0115503. eCollection 2014.
Computational network analysis provides new methods to analyze the brain's structural organization based on diffusion imaging tractography data. Networks are characterized by global and local metrics that have recently given promising insights into diagnosis and the further understanding of psychiatric and neurologic disorders. Most of these metrics are based on the idea that information in a network flows along the shortest paths. In contrast to this notion, communicability is a broader measure of connectivity which assumes that information could flow along all possible paths between two nodes. In our work, the features of network metrics related to communicability were explored for the first time in the healthy structural brain network. In addition, the sensitivity of such metrics was analysed using simulated lesions to specific nodes and network connections. Results showed advantages of communicability over conventional metrics in detecting densely connected nodes as well as subsets of nodes vulnerable to lesions. In addition, communicability centrality was shown to be widely affected by the lesions and the changes were negatively correlated with the distance from lesion site. In summary, our analysis suggests that communicability metrics that may provide an insight into the integrative properties of the structural brain network and that these metrics may be useful for the analysis of brain networks in the presence of lesions. Nevertheless, the interpretation of communicability is not straightforward; hence these metrics should be used as a supplement to the more standard connectivity network metrics.
计算网络分析提供了基于扩散成像纤维束追踪数据来分析大脑结构组织的新方法。网络由全局和局部指标来表征,这些指标最近为诊断以及对精神和神经疾病的进一步理解提供了有前景的见解。这些指标大多基于这样一种观点,即网络中的信息沿着最短路径流动。与这一概念不同,可达性是一种更宽泛的连通性度量,它假定信息可以沿着两个节点之间的所有可能路径流动。在我们的工作中,首次在健康的结构脑网络中探讨了与可达性相关的网络指标的特征。此外,使用对特定节点和网络连接的模拟损伤来分析这些指标的敏感性。结果表明,在检测密集连接的节点以及易受损伤的节点子集方面,可达性优于传统指标。此外,可达性中心性显示出受到损伤的广泛影响,并且这些变化与距损伤部位的距离呈负相关。总之,我们的分析表明,可达性指标可能有助于深入了解结构脑网络的整合特性,并且这些指标可能对存在损伤的脑网络分析有用。然而,可达性的解释并不直接;因此,这些指标应作为对更标准的连通性网络指标的补充来使用。