Suppr超能文献

辨别与白质结构连通性相关的远程和紧密关联之间的差异。

Discriminating the Difference between Remote and Close Association with Relation to White-Matter Structural Connectivity.

作者信息

Wu Chinglin, Zhong Suyu, Chen Hsuehchih

机构信息

Department of Educational Psychology and Counseling, Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, 10610, Taiwan.

State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning & IDG/McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 100875, China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2016 Oct 19;11(10):e0165053. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0165053. eCollection 2016.

Abstract

Remote association is a core ability that influences creative output. In contrast to close association, remote association is commonly agreed to be connected with more original and unique concepts. However, although existing studies have discovered that creativity is closely related to the white-matter structure of the brain, there are no studies that examine the relevance between the connectivity efficiencies and creativity of the brain regions from the perspective of networks. Consequently, this study constructed a brain white matter network structure that consisted of cerebral tissues and nerve fibers and used graph theory to analyze the connection efficiencies among the network nodes, further illuminating the differences between remote and close association in relation to the connectivity of the brain network. Researchers analyzed correlations between the scores of 35 healthy adults with regard to remote and close associations and the connectivity efficiencies of the white-matter network of the brain. Controlling for gender, age, and verbal intelligence, the remote association positively correlated with the global efficiency and negatively correlated with the levels of small-world. A close association negatively correlated with the global efficiency. Notably, the node efficiency in the middle temporal gyrus (MTG) positively correlated with remote association and negatively correlated with close association. To summarize, remote and close associations work differently as patterns in the brain network. Remote association requires efficient and convenient mutual connections between different brain regions, while close association emphasizes the limited connections that exist in a local region. These results are consistent with previous results, which indicate that creativity is based on the efficient integration and connection between different regions of the brain and that temporal lobes are the key regions for discriminating remote and close associations.

摘要

远程联想是一种影响创造性产出的核心能力。与紧密联想不同,人们普遍认为远程联想与更具原创性和独特性的概念相关联。然而,尽管现有研究已经发现创造力与大脑的白质结构密切相关,但尚无研究从网络角度考察大脑区域的连接效率与创造力之间的相关性。因此,本研究构建了一个由脑组织和神经纤维组成的脑白质网络结构,并运用图论分析网络节点之间的连接效率,进一步阐明远程联想和紧密联想在脑网络连接性方面的差异。研究人员分析了35名健康成年人在远程联想和紧密联想方面的得分与大脑白质网络连接效率之间的相关性。在控制了性别、年龄和语言智力后,远程联想与全局效率呈正相关,与小世界水平呈负相关。紧密联想与全局效率呈负相关。值得注意的是,颞中回(MTG)的节点效率与远程联想呈正相关,与紧密联想呈负相关。总之,远程联想和紧密联想在脑网络模式中的作用方式不同。远程联想需要不同脑区之间高效便捷的相互连接,而紧密联想则强调局部区域内存在的有限连接。这些结果与先前的结果一致,表明创造力基于大脑不同区域之间的高效整合和连接,并且颞叶是区分远程联想和紧密联想的关键区域。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d8b/5070771/fe98aee4b2f2/pone.0165053.g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验