• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

梅奥肘关节功能评分的心理测量学特性。

Psychometric properties of the Mayo Elbow Performance Score.

作者信息

Celik Derya

机构信息

Division of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences, Istanbul University, 34740, Bakırköy, Istanbul, Turkey,

出版信息

Rheumatol Int. 2015 Jun;35(6):1015-20. doi: 10.1007/s00296-014-3201-1. Epub 2014 Dec 31.

DOI:10.1007/s00296-014-3201-1
PMID:25549600
Abstract

To translate and culturally adapt the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), a widely used instrument for evaluating disability associated with elbow injuries, into Turkish (MEPS-T) and to determine psychometric properties of the translated version. The MEPS was translated into Turkish using published methodological guidelines. The measurement properties of the MEPS-T (construct validity and floor and ceiling effects) were tested in 91 patients with elbow pathology. The reproducibility of the MEPS-T was tested in 59 patients over 7-14 days. The responsiveness of the MEPS-T was tested in a subgroup of 46 patients diagnosed with lateral epicondylitis and who received conservative treatment for 6 weeks. The interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to estimate the test-retest reliability. The construct validity was analyzed with the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH), Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and the Short Form 36 (SF-36). Effect size (ES) was used to assess the responsiveness. The distribution of floor and ceiling effects was determined. The MEPS-T showed very good test-retest reliability (ICC 0.89). The correlation coefficients between the MEPS-T and DASH and VAS were -0.61 and -0.53, respectively (p < 0.001). The highest correlations were between the MEPS-T and the mental component summary (r = 0.47, p = 0.001) and role emotional (r = 0.45, p = 0.001). The MEPS-T ES, 0.50, was moderate (95% CI 0.33-0.62). We observed no ceiling or floor effects. The MEPS-T represents a valid, reliable and moderately responsive instrument for evaluating patients with elbow disease.

摘要

为了将广泛用于评估肘部损伤相关残疾情况的梅奥肘部功能评分(MEPS)进行翻译和文化调适,使其适用于土耳其语(MEPS-T),并确定翻译版本的心理测量学特性。使用已发表的方法学指南将MEPS翻译成土耳其语。在91例肘部病变患者中测试了MEPS-T的测量特性(结构效度以及地板效应和天花板效应)。在59例患者中进行了为期7至14天的测试,以检验MEPS-T的可重复性。在46例被诊断为外侧上髁炎并接受了6周保守治疗的患者亚组中测试了MEPS-T的反应性。使用组内相关系数(ICC)来估计重测信度。通过手臂、肩部和手部功能障碍(DASH)、视觉模拟量表(VAS)和简明健康调查问卷36项(SF-36)分析结构效度。使用效应量(ES)评估反应性。确定地板效应和天花板效应的分布情况。MEPS-T显示出非常好的重测信度(ICC 0.89)。MEPS-T与DASH和VAS之间的相关系数分别为-0.61和-0.53(p < 0.001)。MEPS-T与心理成分总结(r = 0.47,p = 0.001)和角色情感(r = 0.45,p = 0.001)之间的相关性最高。MEPS-T的效应量为0.50,属于中等水平(95%置信区间0.33 - 0.62)。我们未观察到天花板效应或地板效应。MEPS-T是一种用于评估肘部疾病患者的有效、可靠且具有中等反应性的工具。

相似文献

1
Psychometric properties of the Mayo Elbow Performance Score.梅奥肘关节功能评分的心理测量学特性。
Rheumatol Int. 2015 Jun;35(6):1015-20. doi: 10.1007/s00296-014-3201-1. Epub 2014 Dec 31.
2
Cross-cultural adaptation and reliability and validity of the Dutch Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE-D).荷兰患者自评网球肘评估量表(PRTEE-D)的跨文化调适及其信效度
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014 Aug 11;15:270. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-270.
3
Reliability and validity of Turkish version of the patient rated tennis elbow evaluation.土耳其版患者网球肘评估量表的信度和效度。
Rheumatol Int. 2010 Jun;30(8):1049-54. doi: 10.1007/s00296-009-1101-6. Epub 2009 Aug 26.
4
Cross-cultural adaptation, validity, and reliability of the Turkish version of the Patient-Rated Elbow Evaluation.患者自评肘部评估土耳其语版的跨文化调适、效度和信度。
Clin Rheumatol. 2019 Nov;38(11):3289-3295. doi: 10.1007/s10067-019-04665-4. Epub 2019 Jul 6.
5
Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation Questionnaire on lateral elbow tendinopathy for French-speaking patients.针对说法语患者的外侧肘肌腱病患者自评网球肘评估问卷的跨文化适应与验证。
J Hand Ther. 2016 Oct-Dec;29(4):496-504. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2016.06.007. Epub 2016 Oct 18.
6
The Shanghai Elbow Dysfunction Score: Psychometric Properties, Reliability and Validity Study of the Turkish Version.上海肘关节功能障碍评分:土耳其语版本的心理测量特性、信度和效度研究。
Eval Health Prof. 2024 Mar;47(1):111-118. doi: 10.1177/01632787231183089. Epub 2023 Jun 13.
7
Cross-cultural validation of the Oxford Elbow Score and Mayo Elbow Performance Score in Greek.希腊文版牛津肘部评分和 Mayo 肘部功能评分的跨文化验证。
Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2022 Feb;57:102499. doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2021.102499. Epub 2021 Dec 29.
8
Validation of the Chinese (Mandarin) Version of the Oxford Knee Score in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis.牛津膝关节评分中文版在膝骨关节炎患者中的验证
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Dec;475(12):2992-3004. doi: 10.1007/s11999-017-5495-2. Epub 2017 Sep 7.
9
Cross-cultural adaptation and measurement properties of the italian version of the Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE) questionnaire.意大利版患者自评网球肘评估(PRTEE)问卷的跨文化调适和测量特性。
Phys Ther. 2012 Aug;92(8):1036-45. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20110398. Epub 2012 May 10.
10
Clinimetric testing of the Persian version of the Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE) and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaires in patients with lateral elbow tendinopathy.对患有外侧肘肌腱病的患者进行波斯语版患者自评网球肘评估(PRTEE)和手臂、肩部和手残疾(DASH)问卷的临床计量测试。
Disabil Rehabil. 2022 Jun;44(12):2902-2907. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2020.1844318. Epub 2020 Nov 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Translation, Cross-Cultural Adaptation, and Psychometric Analysis of the Indonesian Version of the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS-INA).《梅奥肘关节功能评分印尼语版(MEPS-INA)的翻译、跨文化调适及心理测量学分析》
Cureus. 2025 Mar 5;17(3):e80106. doi: 10.7759/cureus.80106. eCollection 2025 Mar.
2
The effect of plate location on radial nerve palsy recovery time associated with humeral shaft fractures.钢板位置对肱骨干骨折所致桡神经麻痹恢复时间的影响。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2024 Dec;50(6):2855-2860. doi: 10.1007/s00068-024-02524-9. Epub 2024 Jul 15.
3
Surgical flip-dislocation of the bicolumnar approach without olecranon osteotomy versus olecranon osteotomy in type AO 13C3 distal humeral fracture: a matched-cohort study.

本文引用的文献

1
Accuracy and reliability of the Mayo Elbow Performance Score.梅奥肘关节功能评分的准确性和可靠性。
J Hand Surg Am. 2014 Jun;39(6):1146-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2014.01.041. Epub 2014 Mar 20.
2
Is Platelet-rich plasma superior to whole blood in the management of chronic tennis elbow: one year randomized clinical trial.富血小板血浆在慢性网球肘治疗中是否优于全血:一项为期一年的随机临床试验。
BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2014 Mar 18;6:12. doi: 10.1186/2052-1847-6-12. eCollection 2014.
3
Comparison of the subjective elbow value and the Mayo elbow performance score.
双柱入路不截骨与截骨在治疗 AO 13C3 型肱骨远端骨折中的对比:一项匹配队列研究
J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Nov 29;18(1):913. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-04405-0.
4
Reliability, validity and critical appraisal of the cross-cultural adapted German version of the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS-G).经文化调适的德国版 Mayo 肘关节功能评分(MEPS-G)的信度、效度和评价。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2022 Jun 25;17(1):328. doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-03210-5.
5
Extracapsular subcutaneous endoscopic treatment for refractory lateral epicondylalgia: technique, retrospective results, and prognostic factors.关节囊外皮下内镜治疗难治性外侧上髁炎:技术、回顾性结果及预后因素
Ann Transl Med. 2021 May;9(9):782. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-6799.
6
Floating elbow combining ipsilateral distal multiple segmental forearm fractures: A case report.漂浮肘合并同侧远端多发节段性前臂骨折:1例报告
World J Clin Cases. 2021 May 16;9(14):3372-3378. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i14.3372.
7
Elbow hemiarthroplasty versus open reduction and internal fixation for AO/OTA type 13 C2 and C3 fractures of distal humerus in patients aged 50 years or above: a randomized controlled trial.50 岁及以上患者的肱骨远端 AO/OTA 13 C2 和 C3 型骨折:肘半关节成形术与切开复位内固定的随机对照试验。
Trials. 2020 Jun 8;21(1):497. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04418-8.
8
Lateral Approach Versus Combined Lateral and Anteromedial Approach for Surgical Treatment of Terrible Triad of Elbow: A Meta-Analysis.外侧入路与外侧联合前内侧入路治疗肘关节恐怖三联征的Meta分析
Bull Emerg Trauma. 2020 Jan;8(1):4-9. doi: 10.29252/beat-080102.
9
[Treatment of severe distal humeral bone defects with three-dimensional printing technology].[三维打印技术治疗严重肱骨远端骨缺损]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2018 Dec 15;32(12):1534-1539. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.201803008.
10
Nonoperative manipulative reduction with Chinese herbs for the treatment of a displaced olecranon fracture: A case report.中药非手术手法复位治疗尺骨鹰嘴移位骨折1例报告
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 May;97(21):e10818. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000010818.
主观肘部值与 Mayo 肘部功能评分的比较。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014 Mar;23(3):308-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2013.11.018.
4
Specificity and responsiveness of patient-reported and clinician-rated outcome measures in the context of elbow surgery, comparing patients with and without rheumatoid arthritis.在肘关节炎手术背景下,比较有和没有类风湿关节炎的患者,患者自评和临床医生评定结局测量的特异性和反应性。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2012 Oct;98(6):652-8. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2012.05.011. Epub 2012 Aug 27.
5
Acute radial ulno-humeral ligament injury in patients with chronic lateral epicondylitis: an observational report.慢性外侧肱骨髁炎患者的急性桡尺侧副韧带损伤:观察报告。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2012 Dec;21(12):1651-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2012.04.008. Epub 2012 Jun 26.
6
The reliability, validity and responsiveness of the Dutch version of the Oxford elbow score.荷兰版牛津肘部评分的可靠性、有效性和反应性。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2011 Jul 30;6:39. doi: 10.1186/1749-799X-6-39.
7
Arthroscopic treatment of lateral epicondylitis: comparison of the outcome of ECRB release with and without decortication.关节镜下治疗外侧肱骨上髁炎:ECRB 松解与骨膜下剥离术的疗效比较。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011 Jul;19(7):1178-83. doi: 10.1007/s00167-011-1507-z. Epub 2011 Apr 9.
8
A prospective randomized study comparing a forearm strap brace versus a wrist splint for the treatment of lateral epicondylitis.一项比较前臂带式支具与腕部夹板治疗外上髁炎的前瞻性随机研究。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010 Jun;19(4):508-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2009.12.015. Epub 2010 Apr 2.
9
Rating systems for evaluation of the elbow.肘关节评估的评分系统。
Br Med Bull. 2008;87:131-61. doi: 10.1093/bmb/ldn023. Epub 2008 Jun 6.
10
The development and validation of a patient-reported questionnaire to assess outcomes of elbow surgery.一份用于评估肘部手术结果的患者报告问卷的开发与验证
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008 Apr;90(4):466-73. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.90B4.20290.