Suppr超能文献

对患有外侧肘肌腱病的患者进行波斯语版患者自评网球肘评估(PRTEE)和手臂、肩部和手残疾(DASH)问卷的临床计量测试。

Clinimetric testing of the Persian version of the Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE) and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaires in patients with lateral elbow tendinopathy.

机构信息

School of Physical Therapy, Roth McFarlane Hand and Upper Limb Centre, St. Joseph's Hospital, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada.

Department of Occupational Therapy, The University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

Disabil Rehabil. 2022 Jun;44(12):2902-2907. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2020.1844318. Epub 2020 Nov 12.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the longitudinal validity and responsiveness of the Persian version of Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE) and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) in patients with lateral elbow tendinopathy (LET).

METHODS

Sixty-four patients with LET completed the PRTEE, DASH, and Global Rating of Change Scale (GRC) at baseline and six weeks. The external and internal responsiveness, floor and ceiling effects, minimal detectable change (MDC) and minimal clinically important difference (MCID) were calculated.

RESULTS

No ceiling and floor effects were detected for either the PRTEE or DASH. External responsiveness as an indicator to detect the relationship between change in the measured and external indicator of change was acceptable for both, but higher for the PRTEE (AUC = 0.90; CI: 0.83-0.97) vs. DASH (AUC = 0.80; CI: 69-90). Internal responsiveness to detect intervention related changes indicated slightly superiority in responsiveness for PRTEE. The relative efficiency (1.21), standard effect size (1.14 PRTEE vs. 1.03 DASH), and standard response mean (1.34 PRTEE vs. 1.10 DASH). The MDC were 11 and 12, and MCID were 20 and 18 for the PRTEE and DASH, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Both the DASH and PRTEE were responsive in detecting improvement in patients with LET. The PRTEE was shorter, more efficient, and slightly more responsive which supports its use as a core outcome measure in evaluating patients with LET.Implications for RehabilitationThe Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE) compared with the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) is a shorter questionnaire with higher psychometric and clinimetric properties for evaluating the patients with lateral elbow tendinopathy.This supports the use of the PRTEE in evaluating patients with elbow tendinopathy.

摘要

目的

评估波斯语版患者自评网球肘评估(PRTEE)和手臂、肩部和手部残疾(DASH)在外侧肘肌腱病(LET)患者中的纵向有效性和反应性。

方法

64 名 LET 患者在基线和 6 周时完成了 PRTEE、DASH 和全球变化量表(GRC)。计算了外部和内部反应性、地板和天花板效应、最小可检测变化(MDC)和最小临床重要差异(MCID)。

结果

PRTEE 和 DASH 均未检测到天花板和地板效应。外部反应性作为衡量测量变化与外部变化指标之间关系的指标,两者都可以接受,但 PRTEE 更高(AUC=0.90;CI:0.83-0.97) vs. DASH(AUC=0.80;CI:69-90)。内部反应性以检测干预相关变化表明 PRTEE 的反应性略优。相对效率(1.21)、标准效应量(PRTEE 为 1.14,DASH 为 1.03)和标准反应均值(PRTEE 为 1.34,DASH 为 1.10)。PRTEE 和 DASH 的 MDC 分别为 11 和 12,MCID 分别为 20 和 18。

结论

DASH 和 PRTEE 在检测 LET 患者的改善方面均具有反应性。PRTEE 更短、更有效、反应性略高,这支持将其用作评估 LET 患者的核心结局测量。

康复的意义

与手臂、肩部和手部残疾(DASH)相比,患者自评网球肘评估(PRTEE)是一种更短的问卷,具有更高的心理测量和临床计量学特性,用于评估外侧肘肌腱病患者。这支持在评估肘肌腱病患者时使用 PRTEE。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验