Accounting for baseline differences in meta-analysis.
作者信息
Chaimani Anna
机构信息
Department of Hygiene and Epidemiology, University of Ioannina School of Medicine, Ioannina, Greece;
出版信息
Evid Based Ment Health. 2015 Feb;18(1):23-6. doi: 10.1136/eb-2014-102035. Epub 2014 Dec 30.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Accounting for baseline differences in meta-analysis.在荟萃分析中考虑基线差异。
Evid Based Ment Health. 2015 Feb;18(1):23-6. doi: 10.1136/eb-2014-102035. Epub 2014 Dec 30.
2
Depression severity and effect of antidepressant medications.抑郁症严重程度及抗抑郁药物的作用。
JAMA. 2010 Apr 28;303(16):1597-8; author reply 1599. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.507.
3
Depression severity and effect of antidepressant medications.抑郁严重程度及抗抑郁药物的作用。
JAMA. 2010 Apr 28;303(16):1597; author reply 1599. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.506.
4
Meta-analysis of antidepressant treatment for patients with poststroke depression.中风后抑郁症患者抗抑郁治疗的荟萃分析。
Stroke. 2006 Jun;37(6):1365-6; author reply 1367. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000222914.83670.05. Epub 2006 Apr 27.
5
Depression severity and effect of antidepressant medications.抑郁症严重程度及抗抑郁药物的作用。
JAMA. 2010 Apr 28;303(16):1598; author reply 1599. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.508.
6
What does the latest meta-analysis really tell us about antidepressants?最新的荟萃分析究竟告诉了我们什么关于抗抑郁药的信息？
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2018 Oct;27(5):430-432. doi: 10.1017/S2045796018000240. Epub 2018 May 28.
7
[Placebo effect in the drug therapy of depression].[安慰剂效应在抑郁症药物治疗中的作用]
Ugeskr Laeger. 2000 Apr 17;162(16):2314-7.
8
Elevated C-reactive protein in depression: a predictor of good long-term outcome with antidepressants and poor outcome with psychotherapy.抑郁症中C反应蛋白升高：抗抑郁药长期疗效良好及心理治疗疗效不佳的预测指标。
J Psychopharmacol. 2010 Apr;24(4):625-6. doi: 10.1177/0269881109102770. Epub 2009 Mar 12.
9
Trial analysis questions use of antidepressants in children.试验分析对儿童使用抗抑郁药的情况提出了质疑。
Nature. 2004 Apr 15;428(6984):682. doi: 10.1038/428682b.
10
Raj Persaud on media hype.拉杰·佩尔绍德谈媒体炒作。
Health Serv J. 2008 May 29:28.
引用本文的文献
1
Strategic interventions in clinical randomized trials for metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) and obesity in the pediatric population: a systematic review with meta-analysis and bibliometric analysis.代谢功能障碍相关脂肪性肝病（MASLD）和肥胖症的临床随机试验中的策略干预：系统评价、荟萃分析和文献计量学分析。
BMC Med. 2024 Nov 21;22(1):548. doi: 10.1186/s12916-024-03744-x.
2
The effectiveness of psychological interventions on diabetes distress and glycemic level in adults with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.心理干预对 2 型糖尿病成人患者的糖尿病困扰和血糖水平的影响：系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Psychiatry. 2024 Oct 8;24(1):660. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-06125-z.
3
BSG 2024 IBD guidelines protocol (standard operating procedures).BSG 2024 IBD 指南制定议定书（标准操作程序）。
BMJ Open Gastroenterol. 2023 Feb;10(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjgast-2022-001067.
4
Measurement errors in control risk regression: A comparison of correction techniques.控制风险回归中的测量误差：校正技术比较。
Stat Med. 2022 Jan 15;41(1):163-179. doi: 10.1002/sim.9228. Epub 2021 Oct 15.
5
The effectiveness of Internet-delivered treatment for generalized anxiety disorder: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.互联网治疗广泛性焦虑障碍的疗效：一项更新的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Depress Anxiety. 2021 Feb;38(2):196-219. doi: 10.1002/da.23115. Epub 2020 Nov 22.
6
Robotic versus open urological oncological surgery: study protocol of a systematic review and meta-analysis.机器人与开放泌尿外科肿瘤学手术比较：系统评价和荟萃分析研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Feb 10;10(2):e036609. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036609.
7
A meta-analysis of baseline characteristics in trials on mite allergen avoidance in asthmatics: room for improvement.哮喘患者避免接触螨过敏原试验中基线特征的荟萃分析：仍有改进空间。
Clin Transl Allergy. 2020 Jan 6;10:2. doi: 10.1186/s13601-019-0306-3. eCollection 2020.
本文引用的文献
1
Demystifying fixed and random effects meta-analysis.揭开固定效应和随机效应荟萃分析的神秘面纱。
Evid Based Ment Health. 2014 May;17(2):53-7. doi: 10.1136/eb-2014-101795. Epub 2014 Apr 1.
2
Flexibly modeling the baseline risk in meta-analysis.灵活建模荟萃分析中的基线风险。
Stat Med. 2013 Jan 15;32(1):40-50. doi: 10.1002/sim.5506. Epub 2012 Jul 17.
3
Investigating incoherence gives insight: clopidogrel is equivalent to extended-release dipyridamole plus aspirin in secondary stroke prevention.研究不连贯性可提供深入了解：氯吡格雷与缓释双嘧达莫加阿司匹林在二级卒中预防中等效。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2012 Aug;65(8):835-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.01.019.
4
Randomized, placebo-controlled trials of antidepressants for acute major depression: thirty-year meta-analytic review.抗抑郁药治疗急性重度抑郁症的随机、安慰剂对照试验：三十年的荟萃分析回顾。
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2012 Mar;37(4):851-64. doi: 10.1038/npp.2011.306. Epub 2011 Dec 14.
5
Modelling the effect of baseline risk in meta-analysis: a review from the perspective of errors-in-variables regression.从变量误差回归的角度看荟萃分析中基线风险的影响：综述
Stat Methods Med Res. 2013 Jun;22(3):307-23. doi: 10.1177/0962280211412244. Epub 2011 Sep 8.
6
Interpretation of random effects meta-analyses.随机效应荟萃分析的解读
BMJ. 2011 Feb 10;342:d549. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d549.
7
Antidepressant drug effects and depression severity: a patient-level meta-analysis.抗抑郁药的效果与抑郁严重程度：患者水平的荟萃分析。
JAMA. 2010 Jan 6;303(1):47-53. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1943.
8
Initial severity and antidepressant benefits: a meta-analysis of data submitted to the Food and Drug Administration.初始严重程度与抗抑郁药疗效：对提交给美国食品药品监督管理局的数据进行的荟萃分析。
PLoS Med. 2008 Feb;5(2):e45. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0050045.
9
Effectiveness of paroxetine in the treatment of acute major depression in adults: a systematic re-examination of published and unpublished data from randomized trials.帕罗西汀治疗成人急性重度抑郁症的有效性：对随机试验已发表和未发表数据的系统重新审视。
CMAJ. 2008 Jan 29;178(3):296-305. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.070693.
10
Semi-parametric modelling of the distribution of the baseline risk in meta-analysis.荟萃分析中基线风险分布的半参数建模。
Stat Med. 2007 Dec 30;26(30):5434-44. doi: 10.1002/sim.3066.
Zotero 插件