• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

灵活建模荟萃分析中的基线风险。

Flexibly modeling the baseline risk in meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Economics, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.

出版信息

Stat Med. 2013 Jan 15;32(1):40-50. doi: 10.1002/sim.5506. Epub 2012 Jul 17.

DOI:10.1002/sim.5506
PMID:22807131
Abstract

This paper investigates a likelihood-based approach in meta-analysis of clinical trials involving the baseline risk as explanatory variable. The approach takes account of the errors affecting the measure of either the treatment effect or the baseline risk, while facing the potential misspecification of the baseline risk distribution. To this aim, we suggest to model the baseline risk through a flexible family of distributions represented by the skew-normal. We describe how to carry out inference within this framework and evaluate the performance of the approach through simulation. The method is compared with the routine likelihood approach based on the restrictive normality assumption for the baseline risk distribution and with the weighted least-squares regression. We apply the competing approaches to the analysis of two published datasets.

摘要

本文研究了一种基于似然的方法,用于分析涉及基线风险作为解释变量的临床试验的荟萃分析。该方法考虑了影响治疗效果或基线风险测量的误差,同时面临基线风险分布潜在的误指定。为此,我们建议通过由斜态正态分布表示的灵活分布族来对基线风险进行建模。我们描述了如何在这个框架内进行推断,并通过模拟来评估该方法的性能。该方法与基于基线风险分布的限制性正态性假设的常规似然方法以及加权最小二乘法回归进行了比较。我们将竞争方法应用于两个已发表数据集的分析。

相似文献

1
Flexibly modeling the baseline risk in meta-analysis.灵活建模荟萃分析中的基线风险。
Stat Med. 2013 Jan 15;32(1):40-50. doi: 10.1002/sim.5506. Epub 2012 Jul 17.
2
Semi-parametric modelling of the distribution of the baseline risk in meta-analysis.荟萃分析中基线风险分布的半参数建模。
Stat Med. 2007 Dec 30;26(30):5434-44. doi: 10.1002/sim.3066.
3
The SIMEX approach to measurement error correction in meta-analysis with baseline risk as covariate.在以基线风险作为协变量的荟萃分析中用于测量误差校正的SIMEX方法。
Stat Med. 2014 May 30;33(12):2062-76. doi: 10.1002/sim.6076. Epub 2013 Dec 15.
4
Bayesian adjustment for covariate measurement errors: a flexible parametric approach.协变量测量误差的贝叶斯调整:一种灵活的参数方法。
Stat Med. 2009 May 15;28(11):1580-600. doi: 10.1002/sim.3552.
5
A likelihood approach to meta-analysis with random effects.一种采用随机效应的Meta分析的似然性方法。
Stat Med. 1996 Mar 30;15(6):619-29. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19960330)15:6<619::AID-SIM188>3.0.CO;2-A.
6
Random effects meta-analysis of event outcome in the framework of the generalized linear mixed model with applications in sparse data.基于广义线性混合模型的事件结局的随机效应荟萃分析及其在稀疏数据中的应用。
Stat Med. 2010 Dec 20;29(29):3046-67. doi: 10.1002/sim.4040.
7
Higher-order likelihood inference in meta-analysis and meta-regression.元分析和元回归中的高阶似然推断。
Stat Med. 2012 Feb 20;31(4):313-27. doi: 10.1002/sim.4451. Epub 2011 Dec 15.
8
Multivariate meta-analysis: a robust approach based on the theory of U-statistic.多元荟萃分析:基于 U 统计量理论的稳健方法
Stat Med. 2011 Oct 30;30(24):2911-29. doi: 10.1002/sim.4327. Epub 2011 Aug 10.
9
A comparison of three different models for estimating relative risk in meta-analysis of clinical trials under unobserved heterogeneity.在未观察到异质性情况下,对三种用于估计临床试验荟萃分析中相对风险的不同模型进行比较。
Stat Med. 2007 May 20;26(11):2277-96. doi: 10.1002/sim.2710.
10
Investigating trial and treatment heterogeneity in an individual patient data meta-analysis of survival data by means of the penalized maximum likelihood approach.通过惩罚最大似然法在生存数据的个体患者数据荟萃分析中研究试验和治疗的异质性。
Stat Med. 2008 May 20;27(11):1894-910. doi: 10.1002/sim.3161.

引用本文的文献

1
Measurement errors in control risk regression: A comparison of correction techniques.控制风险回归中的测量误差:校正技术比较。
Stat Med. 2022 Jan 15;41(1):163-179. doi: 10.1002/sim.9228. Epub 2021 Oct 15.
2
Relative efficiency of using summary versus individual data in random-effects meta-analysis.随机效应荟萃分析中使用汇总数据与个体数据的相对效率。
Biometrics. 2020 Dec;76(4):1319-1329. doi: 10.1111/biom.13238. Epub 2020 Mar 3.
3
Accounting for baseline differences in meta-analysis.在荟萃分析中考虑基线差异。
Evid Based Ment Health. 2015 Feb;18(1):23-6. doi: 10.1136/eb-2014-102035. Epub 2014 Dec 30.