School of Nursing, Jilin University, No.965 Xinjiang Street, Changchun, Jilin, 130021, China.
Yanda Medical Research Institute, Hebei Yanda Hospital, Langfang, 065201, China.
BMC Psychiatry. 2024 Oct 8;24(1):660. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-06125-z.
The treatment of diabetes distress plays an important role in diabetes care; however, no meta-analysis has been performed to synthesize the short- and long-term effects of psychological interventions tailored for diabetes distress in people with type 2 diabetes. We aim to evaluate the evidence on tailored psychological interventions for diabetes distress as the primary outcome, focusing on individuals with type 2 diabetes.
Two reviewers independently searched eight databases from their inception to September 2024. EndNote X9 was used to screen records. The Revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials was used to assess the risk of bias. The GRADE system was used to assess the overall certainty of the evidence. A random effect model was used to determine the mean difference or standardized mean difference with 95% CIs. Subgroup analyses based on several intervention characteristics and sensitivity analyses were also conducted.
Totally, 22,279 records were yielded, and we finally included 18 studies in our systematic review. The meta-analysis included data from 16 studies representing 1639 participants. Interventions types included mindfulness-based and cognitive behavioral therapy, among others. Duration of interventions ranged from 4 weeks to 6 months. We found that psychological interventions that measured diabetes distress significantly reduced diabetes distress in the short-term in people with type 2 diabetes (SMD= -0.56; 95% CI= -0.90, -0.22; p = 0.001). Subgroup analysis indicated that this effect could be enhanced when delivered in a group format, by psychologist, using a technology component, or including participants having elevated baseline diabetes distress. However, the short- and long-term effects on HbA1c were non-significant, with results showing (MD = 0.02; 95% CI = -0.23 to 0.26; p = 0.89) and (MD = -0.27; 95% CI = -0.64 to 0.10; p = 0.15), respectively. The long-term effect on diabetes distress was also non-significant (SMD = -0.45; 95% CI = -0.93 to 0.03; p = 0.07).
Psychological interventions tailored for diabetes distress in people with type 2 diabetes are effective in reducing the level of diabetes distress immediately after the intervention. More trials are still needed to further enrich the evidence in this area.
糖尿病困扰的治疗在糖尿病护理中起着重要作用;然而,尚未进行荟萃分析来综合评估针对 2 型糖尿病患者的糖尿病困扰的心理干预的短期和长期效果。我们旨在评估针对糖尿病困扰的个体化心理干预作为主要结局的证据,重点关注 2 型糖尿病患者。
两位审查员独立检索了从成立到 2024 年 9 月的 8 个数据库。使用 EndNote X9 筛选记录。使用修订后的 Cochrane 随机试验偏倚风险工具评估偏倚风险。使用 GRADE 系统评估证据的总体确定性。使用随机效应模型确定具有 95%置信区间的均值差或标准化均数差。还进行了基于几种干预特征的亚组分析和敏感性分析。
共产生了 22279 条记录,我们最终在系统评价中纳入了 18 项研究。荟萃分析纳入了来自 16 项研究的数据,代表了 1639 名参与者。干预类型包括基于正念的和认知行为疗法等。干预持续时间从 4 周到 6 个月不等。我们发现,针对 2 型糖尿病患者的糖尿病困扰的心理干预在短期内显著降低了糖尿病困扰(SMD=-0.56;95%CI=-0.90,-0.22;p=0.001)。亚组分析表明,当以小组形式、由心理学家、使用技术组件或纳入基线糖尿病困扰较高的参与者进行干预时,这种效果可以增强。然而,短期和长期对 HbA1c 的影响均无统计学意义,结果分别显示(MD=0.02;95%CI=-0.23 至 0.26;p=0.89)和(MD=-0.27;95%CI=-0.64 至 0.10;p=0.15)。长期对糖尿病困扰的影响也无统计学意义(SMD=-0.45;95%CI=-0.93 至 0.03;p=0.07)。
针对 2 型糖尿病患者的糖尿病困扰的个体化心理干预在干预后立即降低糖尿病困扰水平方面是有效的。仍需要更多的试验来进一步丰富该领域的证据。