• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

将预先医疗指示纳入严重精神疾病患者的常规护理:实施挑战

Embedding advance directives in routine care for persons with serious mental illness: implementation challenges.

作者信息

Kemp Kathleen, Zelle Heather, Bonnie Richard J

机构信息

Dr. Kemp is with the Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Rhode Island Hospital, and Brown University Warren Alpert Medical School, Providence (e-mail:

出版信息

Psychiatr Serv. 2015 Jan 1;66(1):10-4. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201400276.

DOI:10.1176/appi.ps.201400276
PMID:25554232
Abstract

For people with serious mental illness, research demonstrates the potential positive effects of having an advance directive with specific instructions for mental health care. The Commonwealth of Virginia has undertaken efforts to incorporate the completion of psychiatric advance directives into routine mental health services for individuals with serious mental illness. The inherent complexities of advance directives-a single legal tool for use by a heterogeneous array of consumers, providers, and organizations-have led to more barriers than had been anticipated. This article describes challenges encountered in the first three years of implementation efforts. Data are from feedback on early training attempts and experiences of staff at pilot sites and work groups convened for the implementation project. The authors describe a range of challenges, such as how to present a complete and clear message about the nature, purposes, and potential advantages of psychiatric advance directives to various audiences, in particular their use in recovery-oriented care; how to promote cross-system collaboration among potential users of these directives; and how to overcome resource constraints and sustain interest in the process. Virginia's experience reinforces the importance of developing multifaceted implementation strategies, such as the creation of informational and training tools to spread implementation more effectively, the identification of "champions" or staff members who are invested in implementation, and the development of multiple approaches to facilitating completion of advance directives by consumers.

摘要

对于患有严重精神疾病的人,研究表明制定针对精神卫生保健的具体指示的预先指示具有潜在的积极影响。弗吉尼亚州已努力将精神科预先指示的制定纳入针对患有严重精神疾病的个人的常规精神卫生服务中。预先指示作为一种供不同类型的消费者、提供者和组织使用的单一法律工具,其内在复杂性导致了比预期更多的障碍。本文描述了实施工作头三年中遇到的挑战。数据来自对早期培训尝试的反馈以及试点站点工作人员的经验,还有为实施项目召集的工作组的经验。作者描述了一系列挑战,例如如何向不同受众完整、清晰地传达有关精神科预先指示的性质、目的和潜在优势的信息,尤其是其在以康复为导向的护理中的应用;如何促进这些指示的潜在使用者之间的跨系统协作;以及如何克服资源限制并维持对该过程的兴趣。弗吉尼亚州的经验强化了制定多方面实施策略的重要性,例如创建信息和培训工具以更有效地推广实施,确定参与实施的“倡导者”或工作人员,以及开发多种方法以促进消费者完成预先指示。

相似文献

1
Embedding advance directives in routine care for persons with serious mental illness: implementation challenges.将预先医疗指示纳入严重精神疾病患者的常规护理:实施挑战
Psychiatr Serv. 2015 Jan 1;66(1):10-4. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201400276.
2
Advance directives for mental health care: innovation in law, policy, and practice.精神卫生保健预先指示:法律、政策及实践中的创新
Psychiatr Serv. 2015 Jan 1;66(1):7-9. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201400435.
3
Advance directives for mental health care: an analysis of state statutes.精神卫生保健预先指示:州法规分析
Psychol Public Policy Law. 1998 Sep;4(3):788-804.
4
Psychiatric advance directives: the new frontier in mental health law reform in Australia?精神科预先指示:澳大利亚精神卫生法改革的新前沿?
J Law Med. 2009 May;16(5):891-904.
5
Implementing psychiatric advance directives: service provider issues and answers.实施精神科预先指示:服务提供者的问题与解答
J Behav Health Serv Res. 2003 Jul-Sep;30(3):253-68. doi: 10.1007/BF02287316.
6
Advance directives for psychiatric care: a theoretical and practical overview for legal professionals.精神科护理预先指示:给法律专业人士的理论与实践概述
Psychol Public Policy Law. 1998 Sep;4(3):746-87.
7
[Psychiatric advance directives--medical models into psychiatric medicine].[精神科预先指示——医学模式融入精神医学]
Harefuah. 2014 Jan;153(1):39-42, 64.
8
A survey on use of advance directives for mental health treatment in Oregon.俄勒冈州精神健康治疗预立医嘱使用情况调查。
Psychiatr Serv. 1996 Dec;47(12):1387-9. doi: 10.1176/ps.47.12.1387.
9
Advance directives for mental health treatment.精神卫生治疗的预先指示。
Psychiatr Serv. 1999 Jul;50(7):919-25. doi: 10.1176/ps.50.7.919.
10
A survey of stakeholder knowledge, experience, and opinions of advance directives for mental health in Virginia.弗吉尼亚州利益相关者对心理健康预先指示的知识、经验和意见调查。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2013 May;40(3):232-9. doi: 10.1007/s10488-011-0401-9.

引用本文的文献

1
When a Patient Is at Foreseeable Risk of Losing Decisional and Functional Capacity.当患者面临可预见的丧失决策能力和功能能力的风险时。
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2024 Dec 12;52(4):414-424. doi: 10.29158/JAAPL.240070-24.
2
Supported decision-making interventions in mental healthcare: A systematic review of current evidence and implementation barriers.精神卫生保健中的支持性决策干预措施:当前证据及实施障碍的系统评价
Health Expect. 2024 Apr;27(2):e14001. doi: 10.1111/hex.14001.
3
Clinician knowledge and attitudes of mental health advance statements in Victoria, Australia.
澳大利亚维多利亚州临床医生对心理健康预先指示的知识和态度。
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2022 Oct;31(5):1164-1175. doi: 10.1111/inm.13022. Epub 2022 May 20.
4
Stakeholder perspective on barrier to the implementation of Advance Care Planning in a traditionally paternalistic healthcare system.利益相关者对传统家长式医疗体系中实施预立医疗照护计划的障碍的看法。
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 10;15(11):e0242085. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242085. eCollection 2020.
5
Psychiatric Advance Directives and their relevance to improving psychiatric care in Asian countries.精神科预嘱及其对改善亚洲国家精神卫生保健的相关性。
Asia Pac Psychiatry. 2020 Mar;12(1):e12374. doi: 10.1111/appy.12374. Epub 2019 Dec 23.
6
Advance directives in mental health care: evidence, challenges and promise.精神卫生保健中的预先指示:证据、挑战与前景。
World Psychiatry. 2015 Oct;14(3):278-80. doi: 10.1002/wps.20268.
7
Ethical deliberations about involuntary treatment: interviews with Swedish psychiatrists.关于非自愿治疗的伦理思考:对瑞典精神科医生的访谈
BMC Med Ethics. 2015 May 28;16:37. doi: 10.1186/s12910-015-0029-5.