Cullen Karen W, Chen Tzu-An, Dave Jayna M, Jensen Helen
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2015 May;115(5):743-750. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2014.10.021. Epub 2015 Jan 2.
To investigate changes in student food selection and consumption in response to the new National School Lunch Program meal patterns during fall 2011.
Eight elementary and four intermediate schools in one Houston area school district were matched on free/reduced-price meal eligibility and randomized into control or intervention conditions.
Both intervention and control school cafeterias served the same menu. The intervention school cafeterias posted the new meal pattern daily; students could select one fruit and two vegetable servings per reimbursable meal. Control school students could only select the previous meal pattern: a total of two fruit and vegetable servings per meal.
Students were observed during lunch: student sex and foods selected/consumed were recorded. Diet analysis software was used to calculate energy/food groups selected/consumed.
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel χ² tests examined differences in the percent of students selecting each meal component by condition, controlling for sex, grade, and school free/reduced-price meal eligibility. Analysis of covariance assessed differences in amount of energy/food groups selected and consumed, and differences in percent of food groups consumed.
Observations were conducted for 1,149 elementary and 427 intermediate students. Compared with students in the control schools, significantly more intervention elementary and intermediate school students selected total (P<0.001, P<0.05) and starchy vegetables (P<0.001, P<0.01); more intervention intermediate school students selected fruit (P<0.001), legumes (P<0.05), and protein foods (P<0.01). There were significantly greater amounts of these foods selected and consumed, but no differences in the proportion of the foods consumed by condition. Fewer calories were consumed by elementary and intermediate school intervention students.
More intervention students selected fruit and vegetables at lunch and consumed them compared with control condition students. Future studies with larger and more diverse student populations are warranted.
调查2011年秋季学生食物选择和消费情况对新的全国学校午餐计划膳食模式的响应变化。
休斯顿地区一个学区的8所小学和4所初中根据免费/低价膳食资格进行匹配,并随机分为对照或干预组。
干预组和对照组学校食堂提供相同的菜单。干预组学校食堂每天公布新的膳食模式;学生每餐可选择一份水果和两份蔬菜。对照组学校的学生只能选择以前的膳食模式:每餐共两份水果和蔬菜。
午餐期间观察学生:记录学生性别及所选/食用的食物。使用饮食分析软件计算所选/食用的能量/食物类别。
Cochr an-Mantel-Haenszel χ²检验按条件检查选择每餐各成分的学生百分比差异,控制性别、年级和学校免费/低价膳食资格。协方差分析评估所选和食用的能量/食物类别数量差异以及食用食物类别的百分比差异。
对1149名小学生和427名初中生进行了观察。与对照组学校的学生相比,干预组小学和初中学生选择的蔬菜总量(P<0.001,P<0.05)和淀粉类蔬菜(P<0.001,P<0.01)明显更多;干预组初中学生选择的水果(P<0.001)、豆类(P<0.05)和蛋白质类食物(P<0.01)更多。所选和食用的这些食物量明显更多,但按条件划分的食物消费比例没有差异。小学和初中干预组学生摄入的热量较少。
与对照组学生相比,更多干预组学生在午餐时选择并食用了水果和蔬菜。有必要对规模更大、学生群体更多样化的未来研究进行探索。