Ransom Jason I, Powers Jenny G, Thompson Hobbs N, Baker Dan L
U.S. Geological Survey, Fort Collins Science Center 2150 Centre Avenue, Building C, Fort Collins, CO, 80526, USA.
National Park Service, Biological Resource Management Division 1201 Oakridge Drive, Suite 200, Fort Collins, CO, 80525, USA.
J Appl Ecol. 2014 Feb;51(1):259-269. doi: 10.1111/1365-2664.12166. Epub 2013 Oct 15.
Anthropogenic stress on natural systems, particularly the fragmentation of landscapes and the extirpation of predators from food webs, has intensified the need to regulate abundance of wildlife populations with management. Controlling population growth using fertility control has been considered for almost four decades, but nearly all research has focused on understanding effects of fertility control agents on individual animals. Questions about the efficacy of fertility control as a way to control populations remain largely unanswered.Collateral consequences of contraception can produce unexpected changes in birth rates, survival, immigration and emigration that may reduce the effectiveness of regulating animal abundance. The magnitude and frequency of such effects vary with species-specific social and reproductive systems, as well as connectivity of populations. Developing models that incorporate static demographic parameters from populations not controlled by contraception may bias predictions of fertility control efficacy.Many population-level studies demonstrate that changes in survival and immigration induced by fertility control can compensate for the reduction in births caused by contraception. The most successful cases of regulating populations using fertility control come from applications of contraceptives to small, closed populations of gregarious and easily accessed species.Fertility control can result in artificial selection pressures on the population and may lead to long-term unintentional genetic consequences. The magnitude of such selection is dependent on individual heritability and behavioural traits, as well as environmental variation.. Understanding species' life-history strategies, biology, behavioural ecology and ecological context is critical to developing realistic expectations of regulating populations using fertility control. Before time, effort and funding are invested in wildlife contraception, managers may need to consider the possibility that many species and populations can compensate for reduction in fecundity, and this could minimize any reduction in population growth rate.
人类活动对自然系统造成的压力,特别是景观破碎化以及食物网中捕食者的灭绝,使得通过管理来调控野生动物种群数量的需求日益迫切。近四十年来,人们一直考虑使用生育控制来控制种群增长,但几乎所有研究都集中在了解生育控制剂对个体动物的影响上。关于生育控制作为控制种群数量的一种方法的有效性问题,在很大程度上仍未得到解答。避孕的附带后果可能会在出生率、存活率、迁入和迁出方面产生意想不到的变化,这可能会降低调控动物数量的有效性。这些影响的程度和频率因物种特定的社会和生殖系统以及种群的连通性而异。纳入未受避孕控制的种群的静态人口统计学参数来开发模型,可能会使对生育控制效果的预测产生偏差。许多种群水平的研究表明,生育控制引起的存活率和迁入率变化可以弥补避孕导致的出生率下降。使用生育控制来调控种群数量最成功的案例来自于对小型、封闭的群居且易于接触的物种群体应用避孕药。生育控制可能会对种群产生人工选择压力,并可能导致长期的无意遗传后果。这种选择的程度取决于个体的遗传力和行为特征,以及环境变异。了解物种的生活史策略、生物学、行为生态学和生态背景对于对使用生育控制调控种群数量形成现实的预期至关重要。在投入时间、精力和资金用于野生动物避孕之前,管理者可能需要考虑许多物种和种群能够弥补繁殖力下降的可能性,这可以将种群增长率的任何下降降至最低。