• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

步选技术揭示了亚马逊鸟类群体中空间利用模式的环境预测因素。

Step selection techniques uncover the environmental predictors of space use patterns in flocks of Amazonian birds.

作者信息

Potts Jonathan R, Mokross Karl, Stouffer Philip C, Lewis Mark A

机构信息

Department of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences, Centre for Mathematical Biology, University of Alberta Edmonton, Alberta, Canada ; Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Sheffield Sheffield, UK.

School of Renewable Natural Resources, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center Baton Rouge, Louisiana, 70803 ; Projeto Dinâmica Biólogica de Fragmentos Florestais, INPA Av. André Araújo 2936, Petropólis, Manaus, 69083-000, Brazil.

出版信息

Ecol Evol. 2014 Dec;4(24):4578-88. doi: 10.1002/ece3.1306. Epub 2014 Nov 26.

DOI:10.1002/ece3.1306
PMID:25558353
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4278811/
Abstract

Understanding the behavioral decisions behind animal movement and space use patterns is a key challenge for behavioral ecology. Tools to quantify these patterns from movement and animal-habitat interactions are vital for transforming ecology into a predictive science. This is particularly important in environments undergoing rapid anthropogenic changes, such as the Amazon rainforest, where animals face novel landscapes. Insectivorous bird flocks are key elements of avian biodiversity in the Amazonian ecosystem. Therefore, disentangling and quantifying the drivers behind their movement and space use patterns is of great importance for Amazonian conservation. We use a step selection function (SSF) approach to uncover environmental drivers behind movement choices. This is used to construct a mechanistic model, from which we derive predicted utilization distributions (home ranges) of flocks. We show that movement decisions are significantly influenced by canopy height and topography, but depletion and renewal of resources do not appear to affect movement significantly. We quantify the magnitude of these effects and demonstrate that they are helpful for understanding various heterogeneous aspects of space use. We compare our results to recent analytic derivations of space use, demonstrating that the analytic approximation is only accurate when assuming that there is no persistence in the animals' movement. Our model can be translated into other environments or hypothetical scenarios, such as those given by proposed future anthropogenic actions, to make predictions of spatial patterns in bird flocks. Furthermore, our approach is quite general, so could potentially be used to understand the drivers of movement and spatial patterns for a wide variety of animal communities.

摘要

理解动物运动和空间利用模式背后的行为决策是行为生态学面临的一项关键挑战。从动物运动和动物与栖息地的相互作用中量化这些模式的工具对于将生态学转变为一门预测性科学至关重要。这在经历快速人为变化的环境中尤为重要,例如亚马逊雨林,动物在那里面临着全新的景观。食虫鸟群是亚马逊生态系统中鸟类生物多样性的关键组成部分。因此,理清并量化其运动和空间利用模式背后的驱动因素对于亚马逊地区的保护至关重要。我们使用步长选择函数(SSF)方法来揭示运动选择背后的环境驱动因素。这被用于构建一个机制模型,我们从中推导出鸟群的预测利用分布(家域)。我们表明,运动决策受到树冠高度和地形的显著影响,但资源的消耗和更新似乎对运动没有显著影响。我们量化了这些影响的程度,并证明它们有助于理解空间利用的各种异质性方面。我们将我们的结果与最近关于空间利用的分析推导进行比较,表明分析近似仅在假设动物运动没有持续性时才准确。我们的模型可以转化到其他环境或假设情景中,例如由未来拟议的人为行动所给出的情景,以预测鸟群的空间模式。此外,我们的方法非常通用,因此有可能用于理解各种动物群落运动和空间模式的驱动因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eba3/4278811/c29a4f8386a0/ece30004-4578-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eba3/4278811/a72342a3ec44/ece30004-4578-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eba3/4278811/16ce11ca064f/ece30004-4578-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eba3/4278811/c29a4f8386a0/ece30004-4578-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eba3/4278811/a72342a3ec44/ece30004-4578-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eba3/4278811/16ce11ca064f/ece30004-4578-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eba3/4278811/c29a4f8386a0/ece30004-4578-f3.jpg

相似文献

1
Step selection techniques uncover the environmental predictors of space use patterns in flocks of Amazonian birds.步选技术揭示了亚马逊鸟类群体中空间利用模式的环境预测因素。
Ecol Evol. 2014 Dec;4(24):4578-88. doi: 10.1002/ece3.1306. Epub 2014 Nov 26.
2
Movement is the glue connecting home ranges and habitat selection.移动是连接家园范围和栖息地选择的纽带。
J Anim Ecol. 2016 Jan;85(1):21-31. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12394. Epub 2015 Jul 30.
3
A unifying framework for quantifying the nature of animal interactions.用于量化动物相互作用本质的统一框架。
J R Soc Interface. 2014 Jul 6;11(96). doi: 10.1098/rsif.2014.0333.
4
How to scale up from animal movement decisions to spatiotemporal patterns: An approach via step selection.如何从动物运动决策扩展到时空模式:一种通过步长选择的方法。
J Anim Ecol. 2023 Jan;92(1):16-29. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.13832. Epub 2022 Nov 14.
5
Decay of interspecific avian flock networks along a disturbance gradient in Amazonia.沿亚马孙地区干扰梯度的种间鸟类群集网络衰减。
Proc Biol Sci. 2013 Dec 11;281(1776):20132599. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2013.2599. Print 2014 Feb 7.
6
The influence of a single species on the space use of mixed-species flocks in Amazonian Peru.单一物种对秘鲁亚马逊地区混合物种鸟群空间利用的影响。
Mov Ecol. 2019 Nov 28;7:37. doi: 10.1186/s40462-019-0181-5. eCollection 2019.
7
Functional responses in animal movement explain spatial heterogeneity in animal-habitat relationships.动物运动中的功能反应解释了动物与栖息地关系中的空间异质性。
J Anim Ecol. 2017 Jul;86(4):960-971. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12682. Epub 2017 May 22.
8
What's your move? Movement as a link between personality and spatial dynamics in animal populations.你有何行动?运动作为动物种群中个性与空间动态之间的联系。
Ecol Lett. 2017 Jan;20(1):3-18. doi: 10.1111/ele.12708.
9
Predicting local and non-local effects of resources on animal space use using a mechanistic step selection model.使用机械步选择模型预测资源对动物空间利用的局部和非局部影响。
Methods Ecol Evol. 2014 Mar;5(3):253-262. doi: 10.1111/2041-210X.12150. Epub 2014 Jan 17.
10
Long-term changes in avian biomass and functional diversity within disturbed and undisturbed Amazonian rainforest.干扰和未干扰的亚马逊雨林中鸟类生物量和功能多样性的长期变化。
Proc Biol Sci. 2022 Aug 31;289(1981):20221123. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2022.1123. Epub 2022 Aug 17.

引用本文的文献

1
A 'How to' guide for interpreting parameters in habitat-selection analyses.栖息地选择分析中参数解读的“操作指南”。
J Anim Ecol. 2021 May;90(5):1027-1043. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.13441. Epub 2021 Mar 12.
2
Arctic avian predators synchronise their spring migration with the northern progression of snowmelt.北极鸟类捕食者与融雪的北移同步进行春季迁徙。
Sci Rep. 2020 Apr 29;10(1):7220. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-63312-0.
3
The influence of a single species on the space use of mixed-species flocks in Amazonian Peru.单一物种对秘鲁亚马逊地区混合物种鸟群空间利用的影响。

本文引用的文献

1
Predicting local and non-local effects of resources on animal space use using a mechanistic step selection model.使用机械步选择模型预测资源对动物空间利用的局部和非局部影响。
Methods Ecol Evol. 2014 Mar;5(3):253-262. doi: 10.1111/2041-210X.12150. Epub 2014 Jan 17.
2
Applications of step-selection functions in ecology and conservation.步选择函数在生态学和保护中的应用。
Mov Ecol. 2014 Feb 7;2(1):4. doi: 10.1186/2051-3933-2-4. eCollection 2014.
3
Slowing Amazon deforestation through public policy and interventions in beef and soy supply chains.
Mov Ecol. 2019 Nov 28;7:37. doi: 10.1186/s40462-019-0181-5. eCollection 2019.
4
Parsimonious test of dynamic interaction.动态相互作用的简约检验
Ecol Evol. 2019 Feb 8;9(4):1654-1664. doi: 10.1002/ece3.4805. eCollection 2019 Feb.
5
Environmental characteristics drive variation in Amazonian understorey bird assemblages.环境特征驱动亚马逊雨林下层鸟类群落的变化。
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 22;12(2):e0171540. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171540. eCollection 2017.
6
How memory of direct animal interactions can lead to territorial pattern formation.直接动物互动的记忆如何导致领地模式的形成。
J R Soc Interface. 2016 May;13(118). doi: 10.1098/rsif.2016.0059.
7
Low relative error in consumer-grade GPS units make them ideal for measuring small-scale animal movement patterns.消费级全球定位系统(GPS)设备的相对误差较低,使其成为测量小规模动物运动模式的理想选择。
PeerJ. 2015 Aug 20;3:e1205. doi: 10.7717/peerj.1205. eCollection 2015.
8
A unifying framework for quantifying the nature of animal interactions.用于量化动物相互作用本质的统一框架。
J R Soc Interface. 2014 Jul 6;11(96). doi: 10.1098/rsif.2014.0333.
通过公共政策和干预牛肉及大豆供应链来减缓亚马逊森林砍伐。
Science. 2014 Jun 6;344(6188):1118-23. doi: 10.1126/science.1248525.
4
A memory-based foraging tactic reveals an adaptive mechanism for restricted space use.基于记忆的觅食策略揭示了受限空间利用的适应性机制。
Ecol Lett. 2014 Aug;17(8):924-31. doi: 10.1111/ele.12294. Epub 2014 May 9.
5
Selection, use, choice and occupancy: clarifying concepts in resource selection studies.选择、使用、选择和占用:资源选择研究中概念的澄清。
J Anim Ecol. 2013 Nov;82(6):1183-91. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12141.
6
Moving to stay in place: behavioral mechanisms for coexistence of African large carnivores.为了原地不动而迁移:非洲大型食肉动物共存的行为机制。
Ecology. 2013 Nov;94(11):2619-31. doi: 10.1890/13-0217.1.
7
Decay of interspecific avian flock networks along a disturbance gradient in Amazonia.沿亚马孙地区干扰梯度的种间鸟类群集网络衰减。
Proc Biol Sci. 2013 Dec 11;281(1776):20132599. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2013.2599. Print 2014 Feb 7.
8
Quantifying behavioral changes in territorial animals caused by sudden population declines.量化因种群突然减少而导致的领地动物的行为变化。
Am Nat. 2013 Sep;182(3):E73-82. doi: 10.1086/671260. Epub 2013 Jul 15.
9
Spatio-temporal dynamics in the response of woodland caribou and moose to the passage of grey wolf.林地驯鹿和驼鹿对灰狼通过的反应的时空动态。
J Anim Ecol. 2014 Jan;83(1):185-98. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12108. Epub 2013 Jul 16.
10
Fragmentation impairs the microclimate buffering effect of tropical forests.碎裂化损害了热带雨林的微气候缓冲效应。
PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e58093. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0058093. Epub 2013 Mar 4.