Ramírez-Campillo Rodrigo, Gallardo Francisco, Henriquez-Olguín Carlos, Meylan Cesar M P, Martínez Cristian, Álvarez Cristian, Caniuqueo Alexis, Cadore Eduardo L, Izquierdo Mikel
1Department of Physical Activity Sciences, University of Los Lagos, Osorno, Chile; 2Laboratory of Exercise Sciences, MEDS Clinic, Santiago, Chile; 3Canadian Sport Institute Pacific, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; 4Canadian Soccer Association, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; 5Department of Physical Education, Sport and Recreation, University of La Frontera, Temuco, Chile; 6Family Health Center of Los Lagos, Health Promotion Program, Los Lagos, Chile; 7Laboratory of Physiology and Biomechanics, University Autónoma of Chile, Temuco, Chile; 8Exercise Research Laboratory, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil; 9Faculty of Recreation, Sport and Physical Education, University of Santo Tomás, Bogotá D.C, Colombia; and 10Department of Health Sciences, Public University of Navarre, Navarre, Spain.
J Strength Cond Res. 2015 Jul;29(7):1784-95. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000827.
The aim of this study was to compare the effects of 6 weeks of vertical, horizontal, or combined vertical and horizontal plyometric training on muscle explosive, endurance, and balance performance. Forty young soccer players aged between 10 and 14 years were randomly divided into control (CG; n = 10), vertical plyometric group (VG; n = 10), horizontal plyometric group (HG; n = 10), and combined vertical and horizontal plyometric group (VHG; n = 10). Players performance in the vertical and horizontal countermovement jump with arms, 5 multiple bounds test (MB5), 20-cm drop jump reactive strength index (RSI20), maximal kicking velocity (MKV), sprint, change of direction speed (CODS), Yo-Yo intermittent recovery level 1 test (Yo-Yo IR1), and balance was measured. No significant or meaningful changes in the CG, apart from small change in the Yo-Yo IR1, were observed while all training programs resulted in meaningful changes in explosive, endurance, and balance performance. However, only VHG showed a statistically significant (p ≤ 0.05) increase in all performance test and most meaningful training effect difference with the CG across tests. Although no significant differences in performance changes were observed between experimental groups, the VHG program was more effective compared with VG (i.e., jumps, MKV, sprint, CODS, and balance performance) and HG (i.e., sprint, CODS, and balance performance) to small effect. The study demonstrated that vertical, horizontal, and combined vertical and horizontal jumps induced meaningful improvement in explosive actions, balance, and intermittent endurance capacity. However, combining vertical and horizontal drills seems more advantageous to induce greater performance improvements.
本研究的目的是比较6周的垂直、水平或垂直与水平相结合的增强式训练对肌肉爆发力、耐力和平衡能力的影响。40名年龄在10至14岁之间的年轻足球运动员被随机分为对照组(CG;n = 10)、垂直增强式训练组(VG;n = 10)、水平增强式训练组(HG;n = 10)和垂直与水平相结合的增强式训练组(VHG;n = 10)。测量了运动员在手臂参与的垂直和水平反向纵跳、5次多级跳测试(MB5)、20厘米下落跳反应力量指数(RSI20)、最大踢球速度(MKV)、短跑、变向速度(CODS)、Yo-Yo间歇恢复水平1测试(Yo-Yo IR1)和平衡能力方面的表现。除了Yo-Yo IR1有小的变化外,未观察到CG组有显著或有意义的变化,而所有训练方案都导致了爆发力、耐力和平衡能力方面有意义的变化。然而,只有VHG组在所有性能测试中显示出统计学上显著(p≤0.05)的增加,并且与CG组相比,在各项测试中训练效果差异最显著。虽然实验组之间在性能变化上没有观察到显著差异,但与VG组(即跳跃、MKV、短跑、CODS和平衡能力)和HG组(即短跑、CODS和平衡能力)相比,VHG方案有较小效果的更有效。该研究表明,垂直、水平以及垂直与水平相结合的跳跃对爆发力动作、平衡和间歇耐力能力有显著改善。然而,将垂直和水平训练相结合似乎更有利于带来更大的性能提升。