Suppr超能文献

青少年使用日抛型隐形眼镜与佩戴眼镜的比较。

Daily disposable contact lenses versus spectacles in teenagers.

作者信息

Plowright Andrew J, Maldonado-Codina Carole, Howarth Gillian F, Kern Jami, Morgan Philip B

机构信息

*BSc(Hons), MSc †PhD, MCOptom, FAAO ‡BSc(Hons), MCOptom §MBA, PhD Eurolens Research, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom (AJP, CM-C, GFH, PBM); and Alcon Research Ltd, Fort Worth, Texas (JK).

出版信息

Optom Vis Sci. 2015 Jan;92(1):44-52. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000454.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare clinical and subjective quality-of-life (QoL) data for teenagers wearing daily disposable contact lenses or spectacles.

METHODS

This open-label study randomized subjects (aged 13 to 19 years) with no previous contact lens wear experience to nelfilcon A (DAILIES AquaComfort Plus) contact lenses or spectacles for 6 months. A full clinical workup, as well as subjective QoL measures using the Pediatric Refractive Error Profile and Quality of Life Impact of Refractive Correction questionnaires, was conducted at baseline and at week 4 and months 3 and 6, with an additional study visit at week 2 for subjects randomized to wear contact lenses.

RESULTS

A total of 110 teenagers were enrolled in the study; 13 discontinued before study completion, 10 (17.5%) from the contact lens group and 3 (5.7%) from the spectacle group (p = 0.04). Visual acuity was good for both groups at all study visits. Biomicroscopy assessments were similar at baseline for both groups. Significant differences in Pediatric Refractive Error Profile responses were noted between vision correction groups across visits for appearance (p < 0.001), satisfaction (p < 0.001), activities (p < 0.001), peer perception (p = 0.003), and overall score (p < 0.001). For Quality of Life Impact of Refractive Correction, the contact lens group gave more favorable responses than the spectacle group (p = 0.02). After 6 months of wearing contact lenses, teenagers had a more positive attitude toward comfort, vision, and safety with contact lenses. No serious adverse events were reported during the study.

CONCLUSIONS

The daily disposable lenses used in this study are suitable for vision correction for teenagers, offering improvements in QoL measures during the first month of wear, including appearance, satisfaction, activities, and peer perceptions, without negatively impacting vision or eye health. Teenagers were able to handle contact lenses with the same amount of confidence as spectacles.

摘要

目的

比较佩戴日抛型隐形眼镜和框架眼镜的青少年的临床及主观生活质量(QoL)数据。

方法

这项开放标签研究将无隐形眼镜佩戴经验的受试者(年龄13至19岁)随机分为两组,分别佩戴奈非那明A(DAILIES AquaComfort Plus)隐形眼镜或框架眼镜,为期6个月。在基线、第4周、第3个月和第6个月进行全面的临床检查,以及使用小儿屈光不正概况问卷和屈光矫正生活质量影响问卷进行主观生活质量测量,随机分配佩戴隐形眼镜的受试者在第2周还需进行一次额外的研究访视。

结果

共有110名青少年参与该研究;13人在研究完成前退出,其中10人(17.5%)来自隐形眼镜组,3人(5.7%)来自框架眼镜组(p = 0.04)。在所有研究访视中,两组的视力均良好。两组在基线时的生物显微镜评估相似。在不同访视中,视力矫正组之间在小儿屈光不正概况问卷的外观(p < 0.001)、满意度(p < 0.001)、活动(p < 0.001)、同伴认知(p = 0.003)和总分(p < 0.001)方面的回答存在显著差异。对于屈光矫正生活质量影响问卷,隐形眼镜组的回答比框架眼镜组更积极(p = 0.02)。佩戴隐形眼镜6个月后,青少年对隐形眼镜的舒适度、视力和安全性态度更为积极。研究期间未报告严重不良事件。

结论

本研究中使用的日抛型隐形眼镜适用于青少年视力矫正,在佩戴的第一个月即可改善生活质量指标,包括外观、满意度、活动和同伴认知,且不会对视力或眼部健康产生负面影响。青少年佩戴隐形眼镜的信心与佩戴框架眼镜相同。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验