Lázaro-Muñoz Gabriel
Postdoctoral Research Fellow at the Center for Genomics and Society at the University of North Carolina School of Medicine.
J Law Med Ethics. 2014 Winter;42(4):576-89. doi: 10.1111/jlme.12177.
This paper examines how the application of legal fiduciary principles (e.g., physicians' duty of loyalty and care, duty to inform, and duty act within the scope of authority), can serve as a framework to promote management of clinical genomic "incidental" or secondary target findings that is patient-centered and consistent with recognized patient autonomy rights. The application of fiduciary principles to the clinical genomic testing context gives rise to at least four physician fiduciary duties in conflict with recent recommendations by the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG). These recommendations have generated much debate among lawyers, clinicians, and bioethicists hence I believe this publication will be of value and interest to your readership.
本文探讨了法律信托原则(例如,医生的忠诚和谨慎义务、告知义务以及在授权范围内行事的义务)的应用如何能够作为一个框架,以促进以患者为中心且符合公认患者自主权的临床基因组“偶然”或次要目标发现的管理。将信托原则应用于临床基因组检测背景下,产生了至少四项与美国医学遗传学与基因组学学会(ACMG)最近的建议相冲突的医生信托义务。这些建议在律师、临床医生和生物伦理学家之间引发了诸多争论,因此我相信本出版物会对你的读者有价值且有趣。