• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国重庆法律惩罚措施对酒后驾车威慑效果的调查

Investigation on deterrence effect of legal punishment measures on driving after drinking in Chongqing, China.

作者信息

Suo Qinghui

机构信息

a School of Engineering and Technology , Southwest University , Chongqing , China.

出版信息

Traffic Inj Prev. 2015;16(6):540-4. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2014.1001979.

DOI:10.1080/15389588.2014.1001979
PMID:25569129
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Driving after drinking is one of the main causes associated with road accidents in China. China has been concerned about this serious problem and updated the regulations of road traffic safety law about driving after drinking 3 times in the last 10 years to deter this offense. The deterrence effect of the current punishment measures implemented since January 2013 was studied in this article.

METHODS

Data applied in the study were collected by questionnaire surveys carried out in Chongqing, a city in southwest China. A total of 329 drivers participated in 3 rounds of the survey and a 5-point scale rating was applied in the investigation.

RESULTS

There was a slight difference between drivers' familiarity of the law regarding driving after drinking in April 2013 and April 2014. The perceived certainty of being caught for driving after drinking was higher in April 2013 than in April 2014 and it had a time-dependent decreasing tendency. Our investigations also show that license suspension is the most practical and effective measure and penalty points system ranks second. A monetary fine appears to be inefficient to achieve the desired effects.

CONCLUSIONS

The fourth edition of the Road Traffic Safety Law of the People's Republic of China, which took effect in January 2013 coinciding with the application of random breath testing and intensification of enforcement activity, is effective in deterring driving after drinking according to our investigation. More measures should be implemented to change the decreasing tendency of perceived certainty of being caught for driving after drinking. An increase in the monetary fine is suggested.

摘要

目的

酒后驾车是中国道路交通事故的主要原因之一。中国一直关注这一严重问题,在过去10年里3次更新道路交通安全法中关于酒后驾车的规定,以遏制这种违法行为。本文研究了自2013年1月起实施的现行处罚措施的威慑效果。

方法

本研究使用的数据通过在中国西南部城市重庆进行的问卷调查收集。共有329名司机参与了3轮调查,调查采用5分制评分。

结果

2013年4月和2014年4月司机对酒后驾车法律的熟悉程度略有差异。2013年4月酒后驾车被查获的感知确定性高于2014年4月,且呈随时间下降的趋势。我们的调查还表明,吊销驾照是最切实有效的措施,扣分制度排名第二。罚款似乎无法有效达到预期效果。

结论

根据我们的调查,2013年1月生效的《中华人民共和国道路交通安全法》第四版,恰逢随机呼气测试的应用和执法活动的加强,在遏制酒后驾车方面是有效的。应采取更多措施来改变酒后驾车被查获的感知确定性下降的趋势。建议增加罚款金额。

相似文献

1
Investigation on deterrence effect of legal punishment measures on driving after drinking in Chongqing, China.中国重庆法律惩罚措施对酒后驾车威慑效果的调查
Traffic Inj Prev. 2015;16(6):540-4. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2014.1001979.
2
Predicting DUI decisions in different legal environments: investigating deterrence with a conjoint experiment.预测不同法律环境下的酒后驾车决策:用联合实验研究威慑作用。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2014;15(3):213-21. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2013.808338.
3
Risk perceptions and DUI decisions of drivers in different legal environments: New evidence on differential deterrence from a Chinese sample.不同法律环境下驾驶员的风险感知和 DUI 决策:来自中国样本的差异化威慑新证据。
Accid Anal Prev. 2021 Jul;157:106188. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2021.106188. Epub 2021 May 14.
4
The drink driving situation in China.中国的酒驾情况。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2012;13(2):101-8. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2011.637097.
5
Bridging a historical gap: can changes in perceptions of law enforcement and social deterrence accelerate the prevention of drunk driving in low and middle-income countries?弥合历史差距:执法观念和社会威慑力的变化能否加速中低收入国家对酒后驾车的预防?
Braz J Psychiatry. 2016 Apr-Jun;38(2):161-6. doi: 10.1590/1516-4446-2015-1878.
6
Challenges associated with drunk driving measurement: combining police and self-reported data to estimate an accurate prevalence in Brazil.与酒驾测量相关的挑战:结合警方和自我报告数据估计巴西的准确流行率。
Injury. 2013 Dec;44 Suppl 4:S11-6. doi: 10.1016/S0020-1383(13)70207-9.
7
Driving under the influence of alcohol: frequency, reasons, perceived risk and punishment.酒后驾车:频率、原因、感知风险及处罚
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2015 Mar 12;10:11. doi: 10.1186/s13011-015-0007-4.
8
Effects of drivers' license suspension policies on alcohol-related crash involvement: long-term follow-up in forty-six states.驾照吊销政策对与酒精相关撞车事故参与情况的影响:46个州的长期随访
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2007 Aug;31(8):1399-406. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2007.00441.x. Epub 2007 Jun 9.
9
Alcohol in New Zealand road trauma.新西兰道路创伤中的酒精因素。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2003;2(4):183-90.
10
Hardcore drinking drivers and other contributors to the alcohol-impaired driving problem: need for a comprehensive approach.酗酒驾车者及其他导致酒驾问题的因素:需要采取综合方法。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2007 Mar;8(1):1-10. doi: 10.1080/15389580600992895.

引用本文的文献

1
Drug use and driving behaviors among drivers with and without alcohol-related infractions.驾驶员中有无与酒精相关违规行为的药物使用与驾驶行为。
Trends Psychiatry Psychother. 2020 Jul-Sep;42(3):230-238. doi: 10.1590/2237-6089-2019-0034.
2
Exploring the Effect of Driving Factors on Traffic Crash Risk among Intoxicated Drivers: A case Study in Wujiang.探究驱动因素对醉酒驾驶人群交通事故风险的影响:以吴江为例的研究
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jul 16;16(14):2540. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16142540.