Raynor Hollie A, Anderson Andrea M, Miller Gary D, Reeves Rebecca, Delahanty Linda M, Vitolins Mara Z, Harper Patricia, Mobley Connie, Konersman Kati, Mayer-Davis Elizabeth
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2015 May;115(5):731-742. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2014.11.003. Epub 2015 Jan 6.
Little is known about diet quality with a reduced-energy, low-fat, partial meal replacement plan, especially in individuals with type 2 diabetes. The Action for Health in Diabetes (Look AHEAD) trial implemented a partial meal replacement plan in the Intensive Lifestyle Intervention.
To compare dietary intake and percent meeting fat-related and food group dietary recommendations in Intensive Lifestyle Intervention and Diabetes Support and Education groups at 12 months.
A randomized controlled trial comparing Intensive Lifestyle Intervention with Diabetes Support and Education at 0 and 12 months.
PARTICIPANTS/SETTING: From 16 US sites, the first 50% of participants (aged 45 to 76 years, overweight or obese, with type 2 diabetes) were invited to complete dietary assessments. Complete 0- and 12-month dietary assessments (collected between 2001 and 2004) were available for 2,397 participants (46.6% of total participants), with 1,186 randomized to Diabetes Support and Education group and 1,211 randomized to Intensive Lifestyle Intervention group.
A food frequency questionnaire assessed intake: energy; percent energy from protein, fat, carbohydrate, polyunsaturated fatty acids, and saturated fats; trans-fatty acids; cholesterol; fiber; weekly meal replacements; and daily servings from food groups from the Food Guide Pyramid.
Mixed-factor analyses of covariance, using Proc MIXED with a repeated statement, with age, sex, race/ethnicity, education, and income controlled. Unadjusted χ² tests compared percent meeting fat-related and food group recommendations at 12 months.
At 12 months, Intensive Lifestyle Intervention participants had a significantly lower fat and cholesterol intake and greater fiber intake than Diabetes Support and Education participants. Intensive Lifestyle Intervention participants consumed more servings per day of fruits; vegetables; and milk, yogurt, and cheese; and fewer servings per day of fats, oils, and sweets than Diabetes Support and Education participants. A greater percentage of Intensive Lifestyle Intervention participants than Diabetes Support and Education participants met fat-related and most food group recommendations. Within Intensive Lifestyle Intervention, a greater percentage of participants consuming two or more meal replacements per day than participants consuming less than one meal replacement per day met most fat-related and food group recommendations.
The partial meal replacement plan consumed by Intensive Lifestyle Intervention participants was related to superior diet quality.
对于能量降低、低脂的部分代餐计划的饮食质量,人们了解甚少,尤其是在2型糖尿病患者中。糖尿病健康行动(Look AHEAD)试验在强化生活方式干预中实施了部分代餐计划。
比较强化生活方式干预组和糖尿病支持与教育组在12个月时的饮食摄入量以及达到脂肪相关和食物组饮食建议的百分比。
一项随机对照试验,在0个月和12个月时比较强化生活方式干预与糖尿病支持与教育。
参与者/地点:从美国16个地点,邀请前50%的参与者(年龄45至76岁,超重或肥胖,患有2型糖尿病)完成饮食评估。2397名参与者(占总参与者的46.6%)有完整的0个月和12个月饮食评估(于2001年至2004年收集),其中1186名随机分配到糖尿病支持与教育组,1211名随机分配到强化生活方式干预组。
一份食物频率问卷评估摄入量:能量;来自蛋白质、脂肪、碳水化合物、多不饱和脂肪酸和饱和脂肪的能量百分比;反式脂肪酸;胆固醇;纤维;每周代餐次数;以及来自食物指南金字塔中食物组的每日份数。
协方差混合因子分析,使用带有重复语句的Proc MIXED,控制年龄、性别、种族/民族、教育程度和收入。未调整的χ²检验比较了12个月时达到脂肪相关和食物组建议的百分比。
在12个月时,强化生活方式干预组参与者的脂肪和胆固醇摄入量显著低于糖尿病支持与教育组参与者,纤维摄入量更高。强化生活方式干预组参与者每天食用的水果、蔬菜以及牛奶、酸奶和奶酪份数比糖尿病支持与教育组参与者多,而每天食用的脂肪、油和甜食份数比糖尿病支持与教育组参与者少。与糖尿病支持与教育组参与者相比,强化生活方式干预组中有更大比例的参与者达到了脂肪相关和大多数食物组的建议。在强化生活方式干预组中,每天食用两份或更多代餐的参与者比每天食用少于一份代餐的参与者达到大多数脂肪相关和食物组建议的比例更高。
强化生活方式干预组参与者食用的部分代餐计划与更好的饮食质量相关。