• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

惩罚者的声誉。

The reputation of punishers.

机构信息

Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, WC1E 6BT, UK.

Institut de Biologie, Eco-Ethologie, Université de Neuchâtel, Neuchâtel, CH-2000, Switzerland.

出版信息

Trends Ecol Evol. 2015 Feb;30(2):98-103. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2014.12.003. Epub 2015 Jan 7.

DOI:10.1016/j.tree.2014.12.003
PMID:25577128
Abstract

Punishment is a potential mechanism to stabilise cooperation between self-regarding agents. Theoretical and empirical studies on the importance of a punitive reputation have yielded conflicting results. Here, we propose that a variety of factors interact to explain why a punitive reputation is sometimes beneficial and sometimes harmful. We predict that benefits are most likely to occur in forced play scenarios and in situations where punishment is the only means to convey an individual's cooperative intent and willingness to uphold fairness norms. By contrast, if partner choice is possible and an individual's cooperative intent can be inferred directly, then individuals with a nonpunishing cooperative reputation should typically be preferred over punishing cooperators.

摘要

惩罚是稳定自利主体之间合作的一种潜在机制。关于惩罚声誉重要性的理论和实证研究得出了相互矛盾的结果。在这里,我们提出,各种因素相互作用,解释了为什么惩罚声誉有时有益,有时有害。我们预测,在强制游戏场景和只有通过惩罚才能传达个人合作意愿和遵守公平规范意愿的情况下,最有可能产生收益。相比之下,如果可以进行伙伴选择并且可以直接推断出一个人的合作意愿,那么具有不惩罚合作声誉的个体通常应该比惩罚合作者更受欢迎。

相似文献

1
The reputation of punishers.惩罚者的声誉。
Trends Ecol Evol. 2015 Feb;30(2):98-103. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2014.12.003. Epub 2015 Jan 7.
2
The evolution of punishment through reputation.通过声誉来实现惩罚的演变。
Proc Biol Sci. 2011 Feb 7;278(1704):371-7. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2010.1275. Epub 2010 Aug 18.
3
Overpunishing is not necessary to fix cooperation in voluntary public goods games.过度惩罚对于修复自愿公共物品博弈中的合作行为并非必要。
J Theor Biol. 2013 Jun 7;326:70-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2012.11.034. Epub 2012 Dec 7.
4
Human cooperation based on punishment reputation.基于惩罚声誉的人类合作
Evolution. 2013 Aug;67(8):2446-50. doi: 10.1111/evo.12108. Epub 2013 Apr 9.
5
Individual mobility promotes punishment in evolutionary public goods games.个体流动性促进了进化公共物品博弈中的惩罚行为。
Sci Rep. 2017 Oct 25;7(1):14015. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-12823-4.
6
Retaliation and the role for punishment in the evolution of cooperation.报复行为与惩罚在合作演化中的作用。
J Theor Biol. 2012 Dec 21;315:128-38. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2012.09.012. Epub 2012 Sep 25.
7
When is altruistic punishment useful in social dilemmas?在社会困境中,利他惩罚何时有用?
Biosystems. 2018 Dec;174:60-62. doi: 10.1016/j.biosystems.2018.10.015. Epub 2018 Nov 2.
8
Reputation and punishment sustain cooperation in the optional public goods game.声誉和惩罚维持着可选公共物品博弈中的合作。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021 Nov 22;376(1838):20200293. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0293. Epub 2021 Oct 4.
9
Symbiotic behaviour in the public goods game with altruistic punishment.具有利他惩罚的公共物品博弈中的共生行为。
J Theor Biol. 2021 Sep 7;524:110737. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2021.110737. Epub 2021 Apr 28.
10
Punishment in the form of shared cost promotes altruism in the cooperative dilemma games.以分担成本形式进行的惩罚在合作困境博弈中促进利他行为。
J Theor Biol. 2017 May 7;420:128-134. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2017.03.006. Epub 2017 Mar 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Gradual reputation dynamics evolve and sustain cooperation in indirect reciprocity.渐进声誉动态在间接互惠中演变并维持合作。
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 8;20(8):e0329742. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0329742. eCollection 2025.
2
What people learn from punishment: A cognitive model.人们从惩罚中学到了什么:一种认知模型。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 Aug 12;122(32):e2500730122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2500730122. Epub 2025 Aug 4.
3
Neural architecture of social punishment: Insights from a queue-jumping scenario.社会惩罚的神经结构:来自插队场景的见解。
iScience. 2025 Feb 11;28(3):111988. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2025.111988. eCollection 2025 Mar 21.
4
The impact of group membership on punishment versus partner rejection.群体归属对惩罚与拒绝伙伴的影响。
Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 27;14(1):22238. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-69206-9.
5
The evolution of private reputations in information-abundant landscapes.信息丰富环境中私人声誉的演变。
Nature. 2024 Oct;634(8035):883-889. doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07977-x. Epub 2024 Sep 25.
6
Acting without considering personal costs signals trustworthiness in helpers but not punishers.在不考虑个人成本的情况下采取行动,这表明帮助者值得信赖,但惩罚者并非如此。
Commun Psychol. 2024 May 24;2(1):47. doi: 10.1038/s44271-024-00092-7.
7
Evidence of direct and indirect reciprocity in network-structured economic games.网络结构经济博弈中直接和间接互惠的证据。
Commun Psychol. 2024 May 22;2(1):44. doi: 10.1038/s44271-024-00098-1.
8
Morality in the anthropocene: The perversion of compassion and punishment in the online world.人类世的道德:网络世界中同情与惩罚的扭曲
PNAS Nexus. 2024 Jun 11;3(6):pgae193. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae193. eCollection 2024 Jun.
9
Cross-societal variation in norm enforcement systems.规范执行系统的跨社会差异。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2024 Mar 11;379(1897):20230034. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2023.0034. Epub 2024 Jan 22.
10
Communicating emotions, but not expressing them privately, reduces moral punishment in a Prisoner's Dilemma game.表达情绪但不私下表达,会减少囚徒困境游戏中的道德惩罚。
Sci Rep. 2023 Sep 6;13(1):14693. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-41886-9.