Brookman-Frazee Lauren, Stahmer Aubyn, Stadnick Nicole, Chlebowski Colby, Herschell Amy, Garland Ann F
Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, Child and Adolescent Services Research Center, 3020 Children's Way (MC 5033), San Diego, CA, 92123, USA.
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, M.I.N.D. Institute, U.C. Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2016 Jan;43(1):93-104. doi: 10.1007/s10488-014-0622-9.
This study characterized the use of research community partnerships (RCPs) to tailor evidence-based intervention, training, and implementation models for delivery across different childhood problems and service contexts using a survey completed by project principal investigators and community partners. To build on previous RCP research and to explicate the tacit knowledge gained through collaborative efforts, the following were examined: (1) characteristics of studies using RCP models; (2) RCP functioning, processes, and products; (3) processes of tailoring evidence-based practices for community implementation; and (4) perceptions of the benefits and challenges of collaborating with community providers and consumers. Results indicated that researchers were solely or jointly involved in the formation of almost all of the RCPs; interpersonal and operational processes were perceived as primary challenges; community partners' roles included greater involvement in implementation and participant recruitment than more traditional research activities; and the partnership process was perceived to increase the relevance and "fit" of interventions and research.
本研究通过项目首席研究员和社区合作伙伴完成的一项调查,描述了利用研究社区伙伴关系(RCP)为不同儿童问题和服务环境量身定制循证干预、培训和实施模式的情况。为了在以往RCP研究的基础上进一步发展,并阐明通过合作努力获得的隐性知识,研究考察了以下方面:(1)使用RCP模式的研究的特征;(2)RCP的运作、过程和成果;(3)为社区实施量身定制循证实践的过程;(4)对与社区提供者和消费者合作的益处和挑战的看法。结果表明,研究人员几乎参与了所有RCP的单独或联合组建;人际和运作过程被视为主要挑战;社区伙伴的角色包括在实施和参与者招募方面比传统研究活动有更大的参与度;并且伙伴关系过程被认为提高了干预措施和研究的相关性及“适配性”。