Rowan Mark, Lee David, Pi-Anfruns Joan, Shiffler Parker, Aghaloo Tara, Moy Peter K
Dental Student, UCLA School of Dentistry, Los Angeles, CA.
Assistant Clinical Professor, Dental Implant Center, UCLA School of Dentistry, Los Angeles, CA.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015 Feb;73(2):253-7. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2014.09.024. Epub 2014 Oct 13.
The purpose was to objectively measure the stability of immediately placed implants compared with implants placed at healed sites using implant stability quotient (ISQ) values obtained by resonance frequency analysis.
Data were collected from 137 Nobel Replace Tapered Groovy Implants placed in 85 patients 19 to 93 years old. All implants were placed by the same surgeon from May 2007 to October 2011. Forty-one implants were placed immediately after extraction with MasterGraft bone grafting material and 96 were placed in healed sites with no grafting material. ISQ values obtained by the Osstell ISQ System were recorded at the time of implant placement and at a subsequent follow-up appointment (T2). T2 was split into 2- to 3-month and 4- to 6-month groups depending on when their follow-up ISQ values were obtained. Data were analyzed using simple linear regression.
Implants placed in healed sites had higher average ISQ values at implant placement compared with immediately placed implants; however, mean ISQ values in the 2 immediate implant groups exceeded the ISQ threshold of 65. Immediately placed implants in the 2- to 3-month and 4- to 6-month groups had average ISQ values of 65.60 and 68.65, respectively, whereas implants placed in healed sites had averages of 76.73 (2- to 3-month group) and 71.23 (4- to 6-month group). These differences were statistically significant (P < .05). At subsequent follow-up appointments, implants placed in healed sites had higher mean ISQ values. Implants in healed sites had ISQ averages of 79.58 (2- to 3-month group) and 77.31 (4- to 6-month group), whereas immediately placed implants had averages of 73.88 and 70.14. These differences were statistically significant (P < .05). Moreover, these mean ISQ values in immediate implants exceeded the ISQ threshold of 65.
Although mean ISQ values of immediately placed implants are lower than those of delayed implants at implant placement and follow-up appointments, immediate implant mean ISQ values consistently remain higher than the clinically successful ISQ threshold of 65 throughout the osseointegration process. These results support the immediate placement of implants in extraction sockets under favorable conditions.
本研究旨在通过共振频率分析获得的种植体稳定性商数(ISQ)值,客观测量即刻种植的种植体与在愈合位点植入的种植体的稳定性。
收集了85例年龄在19至93岁患者中植入的137枚Nobel Replace锥形凹槽种植体的数据。所有种植体均由同一位外科医生在2007年5月至2011年10月期间植入。41枚种植体在拔牙后即刻植入,并使用MasterGraft骨移植材料,96枚种植体植入愈合位点,未使用移植材料。通过Osstell ISQ系统在种植体植入时及随后的随访预约(T2)时记录ISQ值。根据随访ISQ值的获取时间,将T2分为2至3个月组和4至6个月组。采用简单线性回归分析数据。
与即刻植入的种植体相比,在愈合位点植入的种植体在植入时的平均ISQ值更高;然而,两个即刻种植组的平均ISQ值均超过了65的ISQ阈值。2至3个月组和4至6个月组即刻植入的种植体平均ISQ值分别为65.60和68.65,而在愈合位点植入的种植体平均ISQ值分别为76.73(2至3个月组)和71.23(4至6个月组)。这些差异具有统计学意义(P < .05)。在随后的随访预约中,在愈合位点植入的种植体平均ISQ值更高。愈合位点植入的种植体平均ISQ值为79.58(2至3个月组)和77.31(4至6个月组),而即刻植入的种植体平均ISQ值为73.88和70.14。这些差异具有统计学意义(P < .05)。此外,即刻种植体的这些平均ISQ值超过了65的ISQ阈值。
尽管即刻植入的种植体在植入时和随访预约时的平均ISQ值低于延期种植体,但在整个骨结合过程中,即刻种植体的平均ISQ值始终高于临床上成功的ISQ阈值65。这些结果支持在有利条件下将种植体即刻植入拔牙窝。