Suppr超能文献

金属氧化物纳米材料的遗传毒性:近期数据综述及可能机制探讨

Genotoxicity of metal oxide nanomaterials: review of recent data and discussion of possible mechanisms.

作者信息

Golbamaki Nazanin, Rasulev Bakhtiyor, Cassano Antonio, Marchese Robinson Richard L, Benfenati Emilio, Leszczynski Jerzy, Cronin Mark T D

机构信息

Laboratory of Environmental Chemistry and Toxicology at the Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Nanoscale. 2015 Feb 14;7(6):2154-98. doi: 10.1039/c4nr06670g.

Abstract

Nanotechnology has rapidly entered into human society, revolutionized many areas, including technology, medicine and cosmetics. This progress is due to the many valuable and unique properties that nanomaterials possess. In turn, these properties might become an issue of concern when considering potentially uncontrolled release to the environment. The rapid development of new nanomaterials thus raises questions about their impact on the environment and human health. This review focuses on the potential of nanomaterials to cause genotoxicity and summarizes recent genotoxicity studies on metal oxide/silica nanomaterials. Though the number of genotoxicity studies on metal oxide/silica nanomaterials is still limited, this endpoint has recently received more attention for nanomaterials, and the number of related publications has increased. An analysis of these peer reviewed publications over nearly two decades shows that the test most employed to evaluate the genotoxicity of these nanomaterials is the comet assay, followed by micronucleus, Ames and chromosome aberration tests. Based on the data studied, we concluded that in the majority of the publications analysed in this review, the metal oxide (or silica) nanoparticles of the same core chemical composition did not show different genotoxicity study calls (i.e. positive or negative) in the same test, although some results are inconsistent and need to be confirmed by additional experiments. Where the results are conflicting, it may be due to the following reasons: (1) variation in size of the nanoparticles; (2) variations in size distribution; (3) various purities of nanomaterials; (4) variation in surface areas for nanomaterials with the same average size; (5) differences in coatings; (6) differences in crystal structures of the same types of nanomaterials; (7) differences in size of aggregates in solution/media; (8) differences in assays; (9) different concentrations of nanomaterials in assay tests. Indeed, due to the observed inconsistencies in the recent literature and the lack of adherence to appropriate, standardized test methods, reliable genotoxicity assessment of nanomaterials is still challenging.

摘要

纳米技术已迅速融入人类社会,给包括科技、医学和化妆品在内的诸多领域带来了变革。这一进展得益于纳米材料所具备的许多有价值且独特的特性。反过来,在考虑纳米材料可能不受控制地释放到环境中时,这些特性可能会引发人们的担忧。新型纳米材料的迅速发展因此引发了关于其对环境和人类健康影响的问题。本综述聚焦于纳米材料产生遗传毒性的可能性,并总结了近期关于金属氧化物/二氧化硅纳米材料的遗传毒性研究。尽管关于金属氧化物/二氧化硅纳米材料的遗传毒性研究数量仍然有限,但这一终点指标最近在纳米材料研究中受到了更多关注,相关出版物的数量也有所增加。对近二十年来这些经过同行评审的出版物的分析表明,用于评估这些纳米材料遗传毒性的最常用测试方法是彗星试验,其次是微核试验、艾姆斯试验和染色体畸变试验。基于所研究的数据,我们得出结论,在本综述分析的大多数出版物中,具有相同核心化学成分的金属氧化物(或二氧化硅)纳米颗粒在同一测试中并未表现出不同的遗传毒性研究结果(即阳性或阴性),尽管有些结果并不一致,需要通过额外的实验来证实。当结果相互矛盾时,可能是由于以下原因:(1)纳米颗粒尺寸的变化;(2)尺寸分布的变化;(3)纳米材料纯度的差异;(4)具有相同平均尺寸的纳米材料表面积的变化;(5)涂层的差异;(6)相同类型纳米材料晶体结构的差异;(7)溶液/介质中聚集体尺寸的差异;(8)试验方法的差异;(9)试验测试中纳米材料浓度的不同。事实上,由于近期文献中观察到的不一致性以及缺乏对适当、标准化测试方法的遵循,对纳米材料进行可靠的遗传毒性评估仍然具有挑战性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验