Christensen P, Bliddal H, Riecke B F, Leeds A R, Astrup A, Christensen R
The Parker Institute, Copenhagen University Hospital, Frederiksberg, DenmarkDepartment of Human Nutrition, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg, DenmarkUniversity of Surrey and North London Obesity Surgery Service, Whittington and Central Middlesex Hospitals, London, UK.
Clin Obes. 2011 Feb;1(1):31-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1758-8111.2011.00006.x.
There is no consensus on whether 'very low-energy diets' (VLED; <800 kcal d(-1) ) cause greater weight loss in obese individuals than 'low-energy diets' (LED; 800-1200 kcal d(-1) ). The objective was to determine whether a very low-energy formula diet would cause greater weight loss than a formula 810 kcal d(-1) LED in older sedentary individuals. This is a pragmatic randomized controlled trial.
obesity (body mass index [BMI] > 30); age >50 years, with knee osteoarthritis. Participants were randomized to VLED (420-554 kcal d(-1) ) or LED (810 kcal d(-1) ) for 8 weeks, followed by a fixed-energy (1200 kcal d(-1) ) diet with food and two diet products daily for 8 weeks. In all, 192 participants were randomized. Mean age was 63 years (standard deviation: 6), mean weight 103.2 kg (15.0) and BMI of 37.3 kg m(-2) (4.8) at baseline. Mean weight losses in VLED and LED groups were 11.4 kg (standard error: 0.5) and 10.7 kg (0.5) at week 8 and 13.3 kg (0.7) and 12.2 kg (0.6) at week 16. Mean differences between groups were 0.76 kg (95% confidence interval: -0.59 to 2.10; P = 0.27) and 1.08 kg (-0.66 to 2.81; P = 0.22) at 8 and 16 weeks, respectively. Loss of lean body mass was 2.1 kg (0.2) and 1.2 kg (0.4) (17% and 11% of the weight lost, respectively) at week 16 in the VLED and LED group with a mean difference of 0.85 kg (0.01 to 1.69; P = 0.047). Significant adverse effects comparing VLED and LED, were bad breath: 34 (35%) vs. 21 (22%), intolerance to cold: 39 (41%) vs. 17 (18%) and flatulence: 43 (45%) vs. 28 (29%) for VLED and LED at 8 weeks (P < 0.05 in all cases). The VLED and LED regimens were equally successful in inducing weight loss. The significantly lower loss of lean tissue in the LED group together with more frequently reported side effects in the VLED group, favours the choice of low-energy diet (LED) for the treatment of obesity.
对于“极低能量饮食”(VLED;<800千卡/天)在肥胖个体中是否比“低能量饮食”(LED;800 - 1200千卡/天)能导致更多体重减轻,目前尚无共识。目的是确定在久坐不动的老年个体中,极低能量配方饮食是否比810千卡/天的低能量配方饮食导致更多体重减轻。这是一项实用的随机对照试验。
肥胖(体重指数[BMI]>30);年龄>50岁,患有膝关节骨关节炎。参与者被随机分为VLED组(420 - 554千卡/天)或LED组(810千卡/天),为期8周,随后是固定能量(1200千卡/天)饮食,每天搭配食物和两种饮食产品,为期8周。总共192名参与者被随机分组。基线时,平均年龄为63岁(标准差:6),平均体重103.2千克(15.0),BMI为37.3千克/米²(4.8)。VLED组和LED组在第8周时的平均体重减轻分别为11.4千克(标准误:0.5)和10.7千克(0.5),在第16周时分别为13.3千克(0.7)和12.2千克(0.6)。两组在第8周和第16周的平均差异分别为0.76千克(95%置信区间:-0.59至2.10;P = 0.27)和1.08千克(-0.66至2.81;P = 0.22)。在第16周时,VLED组和LED组的去脂体重减少分别为2.1千克(0.2)和1.2千克(0.4)(分别占体重减轻的17%和11%),平均差异为0.85千克(0.01至1.69;P = 0.047)。比较VLED组和LED组的显著不良反应,在第8周时,口臭:VLED组34例(35%),LED组21例(22%);不耐寒:VLED组39例(41%),LED组17例(18%);肠胃胀气:VLED组43例(45%),LED组28例(29%)(所有情况P<0.05)。VLED和LED方案在诱导体重减轻方面同样成功。LED组去脂组织损失显著更低,以及VLED组更频繁报告的副作用,表明对于肥胖治疗,低能量饮食(LED)是更好的选择。