Suppr超能文献

全膳食替代计划对心理健康的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Effects of total diet replacement programs on mental well-being: A systematic review with meta-analyses.

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine and Health, Charles Perkins Centre, Boden Institute of Obesity, Nutrition, Exercise & Eating Disorders, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.

School of Human Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia.

出版信息

Obes Rev. 2022 Nov;23(11):e13465. doi: 10.1111/obr.13465. Epub 2022 Aug 23.

Abstract

This systematic review with meta-analyses assessed the effects of total diet replacement (TDR) programs on mental well-being in clinical trial participants with a body mass index greater than or equal to 25 kg/m . TDR programs involve replacing all dietary requirements with nutritionally replete formula foods and are generally administered to induce rapid weight loss. To date, it is largely unclear what effects TDR programs may have on mental well-being, particularly in the long-term. To address this, we screened 25,976 references across six databases and extracted 35 publications. These 35 publications provided sufficient data to evaluate the effects of TDR programs on depression, anxiety, stress, positive affect, negative affect, vitality, role-emotional, social functioning, mental health, mental composite summary score, self-esteem, and general psychological health in 24 meta-analyses. Due to the lack of research comparing TDR programs to comparator groups, 22 of our 24 meta-analyses explored change in these mental well-being sub-domains over time in TDR programs without comparators. Specifically, we assessed the change from pre-diet (before the TDR program) to either post-diet (up to and including two months after the TDR program); and/or follow-up (more than two months after the TDR program). For depression and anxiety, we were also able to assess the change from pre-diet to mid-diet (which fell within two weeks of the diet half-way point). The remaining two meta-analyses assessed the difference in depression scores between a TDR group and a food-based comparator group from pre-diet to post-diet and from pre-diet to follow-up. Across all meta-analyses, our results found no marked adverse effects of TDR programs on any mental well-being sub-domain. In fact, clear improvements were observed for depression, anxiety, stress, vitality, role-emotional, and social functioning at post-diet. Interestingly, the improvements for depression, vitality and role-emotional were maintained at follow-up. All improvements were observed in meta-analyses without comparators. While the two comparator-based meta-analyses showed no difference between TDR programs and food-based diets in depression symptoms, there was low statistical power. For all meta-analyses containing three or more independent samples, we constructed prediction intervals to determine the range within which the mean of the true effects may fall for future populations. While these prediction intervals varied between sub-domains, we found that mean depression scores are only likely to increase (i.e., depression will worsen) in less than 3% of future TDR interventions which meet our inclusion/exclusion criteria. Taken together, we concluded that for adults with a body mass index greater than or equal to 25 kg/m , TDR programs are unlikely to lead to marked adverse effects on mental well-being. These findings do not support the exclusion of participants from trials or interventions involving TDR programs based on concerns that these programs may adversely affect mental well-being. In fact, by excluding these participants, they may be prevented from improving their metabolic health and mental well-being.

摘要

本系统评价结合荟萃分析评估了总膳食替代(TDR)计划对 BMI 大于或等于 25kg/m 的临床试验参与者心理健康的影响。TDR 计划涉及用营养充足的配方食品替代所有饮食需求,通常用于诱导快速减肥。迄今为止,TDR 计划对心理健康可能产生的影响,尤其是长期影响,在很大程度上仍不清楚。为了解决这个问题,我们在六个数据库中筛选了 25976 篇参考文献,并提取了 35 篇出版物。这 35 篇出版物提供了足够的数据,可在 24 项荟萃分析中评估 TDR 计划对抑郁、焦虑、压力、积极情绪、消极情绪、活力、情感角色、社会功能、心理健康、心理健康综合摘要评分、自尊和一般心理健康的影响。由于缺乏将 TDR 计划与对照组进行比较的研究,我们的 24 项荟萃分析中有 22 项专门探讨了在没有对照组的情况下 TDR 计划中这些心理健康亚领域随时间的变化。具体来说,我们评估了从饮食前(TDR 计划之前)到饮食后(包括 TDR 计划结束后两个月内)或随访(TDR 计划结束后两个月以上)的变化。对于抑郁和焦虑,我们还能够评估从饮食前到饮食中期(饮食进行到一半的两周内)的变化。其余两项荟萃分析评估了 TDR 组和基于食物的对照组在饮食前到饮食后和饮食前到随访期间的抑郁评分差异。在所有荟萃分析中,我们的结果没有发现 TDR 计划对任何心理健康亚领域有明显的不良影响。事实上,在饮食后,抑郁、焦虑、压力、活力、情感角色和社会功能明显改善。有趣的是,抑郁、活力和情感角色的改善在随访中得到了维持。所有改善都在没有对照组的荟萃分析中观察到。虽然两项基于对照组的荟萃分析显示 TDR 计划与基于食物的饮食在抑郁症状方面没有差异,但统计效能较低。对于包含三个或更多独立样本的所有荟萃分析,我们构建了预测区间,以确定未来人群中真实效应平均值可能落入的范围。虽然这些预测区间因亚领域而异,但我们发现,未来符合我们纳入/排除标准的 TDR 干预措施中,只有不到 3%的情况下,抑郁评分可能会增加(即,抑郁会恶化)。综上所述,我们得出结论,对于 BMI 大于或等于 25kg/m 的成年人来说,TDR 计划不太可能对心理健康产生明显的不良影响。这些发现不支持因担心这些计划可能对心理健康产生不利影响而将参与者排除在 TDR 计划相关试验或干预之外。事实上,通过排除这些参与者,他们可能会阻止他们改善代谢健康和心理健康。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4cd7/9786773/ae95f2a367b7/OBR-23-e13465-g003.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验