Suppr超能文献

[精神分裂症的神经认知洞察:一项荟萃分析]

[Neurocognitive insight in schizophrenia: a meta-analysis].

作者信息

Potvin Stéphane, Pelletier Julie, Stip Emmanuel

机构信息

Centre de recherche de l'Institut universitaire en santé mentale de Montréal, Université de Montréal; Département de psychiatrie, Université de Montréal.

Département de psychiatrie, Université de Montréal.

出版信息

Sante Ment Que. 2014 Fall;39(2):183-200.

Abstract

Background Schizophrenia is well-known to be associated with a lack of insight into symptoms. Comparatively, little is known on insight into neurocognitive deficits in schizophrenia, despite the fact that these dysfunctions are undoubtedly core features of the disorder. Recently, growing interest has been paid to subjective cognition, and thus far, results have been heterogeneous. The objectives of current meta-analysis were to determine the magnitude of subjective complaints in schizophrenia; to examine the association between subjective cognitive complaints and objective cognition, as well psychiatric symptoms and insight into illness. The meta-analysis also sought to determine if results are influenced by the choice of the scale used to measure subjective cognition. Methods A search was performed with PubMed, PsycInfo and EMBASE, using the following key words: schizophrenia OR psychosis AND cognition OR memory OR attention OR "executive functions" AND insight OR "subjective cognition" OR awareness. Studies involving patients with schizophrenia-spectrum disorders and measuring subjective cognition with a validated self-report scale were included. Studies using scales measuring insight into thinking processes (e.g. Beck Cognitive Insight Scale) were excluded. Statistical analyses were performed with the Comprehensive Meta-Analysis-2 software. Cognitive scores were grouped into 6 cognitive domains (as recommended by the MATRICS group): attention, problems solving, speed of processing, verbal memory, visual memory and working memory. The difference in cognitive complaints between schizophrenia patients and healthy controls was examined using Cohen's d. The associations between subjective cognition and objective cognition, psychiatric symptoms and insight into illness were examined using Pearson's correlation coefficients. Results Twenty-two studies were retrieved, including a total of 1609 patients and 294 controls. Patients reported increased subjective cognitive complaints, compared to controls (moderate effect size). A weak association was observed between subjective and objective (global) cognition. The association was larger in studies using the Subjective Scale To Investigate Cognition in Schizophrenia (SSTICS), compared to studies using other scales. The largest association was observed between subjective complaints and problem solving. The association between subjective complaints and depressive symptoms was in the same range as the association between subjective complaints (measured with the SSTICS) and objective cognition. No association was found between subjective complaints and positive / negative symptoms. Finally, a weak association was found between subjective complaints and insight into illness. Discussion Taken together, these results suggest that schizophrenia patients report significant subjective cognitive complaints. However, patients have a poor understanding of these deficits, since subjective complaints are as strongly associated with depressive symptoms as they are associated with objective cognitive deficits. Schizophrenia patients may be more aware of their problem solving deficits. However, this observation is based on a limited number of studies and will need to be replicated in future studies. Our results also show that insight into neurocognitive deficits is largely independent from insight into illness. Finally, the results of the current meta-analysis may have methodological implications, since they suggest that the SSTICS produces stronger associations between subjective and objective cognition than other scales. In the future, greater attention will need to be paid to the domains of subjective complaints, as well as to subjective cognitive complaints in other psychiatric disorders.

摘要

背景

众所周知,精神分裂症与缺乏对症状的洞察力有关。相比之下,尽管神经认知缺陷无疑是该疾病的核心特征,但对于精神分裂症患者对这些缺陷的洞察力却知之甚少。最近,人们对主观认知的兴趣日益浓厚,迄今为止,研究结果参差不齐。本次荟萃分析的目的是确定精神分裂症患者主观抱怨的程度;研究主观认知抱怨与客观认知、精神症状以及对疾病的洞察力之间的关联。该荟萃分析还试图确定结果是否受用于测量主观认知的量表选择的影响。

方法

在PubMed、PsycInfo和EMBASE数据库中进行检索,使用以下关键词:精神分裂症或精神病、认知或记忆或注意力或“执行功能”、洞察力或“主观认知”或意识。纳入涉及精神分裂症谱系障碍患者并使用经过验证的自我报告量表测量主观认知的研究。排除使用测量对思维过程洞察力的量表(如贝克认知洞察力量表)的研究。使用Comprehensive Meta-Analysis-2软件进行统计分析。认知分数被分为6个认知领域(按照MATRICS小组的建议):注意力、问题解决、处理速度、言语记忆、视觉记忆和工作记忆。使用科恩d值检验精神分裂症患者与健康对照之间认知抱怨的差异。使用皮尔逊相关系数检验主观认知与客观认知、精神症状以及对疾病的洞察力之间的关联。

结果

检索到22项研究,共纳入1609例患者和294例对照。与对照组相比,患者报告的主观认知抱怨增加(中等效应量)。主观与客观(整体)认知之间观察到弱关联。与使用其他量表的研究相比,使用精神分裂症认知调查主观量表(SSTICS)的研究中这种关联更大。主观抱怨与问题解决之间的关联最大。主观抱怨与抑郁症状之间的关联与主观抱怨(用SSTICS测量)与客观认知之间的关联处于同一范围。未发现主观抱怨与阳性/阴性症状之间存在关联。最后,主观抱怨与对疾病的洞察力之间发现弱关联。

讨论

综上所述,这些结果表明精神分裂症患者报告了显著的主观认知抱怨。然而,患者对这些缺陷的理解较差,因为主观抱怨与抑郁症状的关联程度与它们与客观认知缺陷的关联程度一样强。精神分裂症患者可能更意识到自己的问题解决缺陷。然而,这一观察结果基于有限数量的研究,未来研究需要进行重复验证。我们的结果还表明,对神经认知缺陷的洞察力在很大程度上独立于对疾病的洞察力。最后,本次荟萃分析的结果可能具有方法学意义,因为它们表明SSTICS在主观和客观认知之间产生的关联比其他量表更强。未来,需要更加关注主观抱怨的领域以及其他精神疾病中的主观认知抱怨。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验