• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The Discrepancy between Subjective and Objective Evaluations of Cognitive and Functional Ability among People with Schizophrenia: A Systematic Review.精神分裂症患者认知与功能能力主观和客观评估之间的差异:一项系统综述
Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Dec 30;14(1):30. doi: 10.3390/bs14010030.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Predictors of the accuracy of self assessment of everyday functioning in people with schizophrenia.预测精神分裂症患者日常功能自我评估准确性的因素。
Schizophr Res. 2012 May;137(1-3):190-5. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2012.02.002. Epub 2012 Mar 2.
4
Deployment of personnel to military operations: impact on mental health and social functioning.人员部署到军事行动中:对心理健康和社会功能的影响。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2018 Jun 1;14(1):1-127. doi: 10.4073/csr.2018.6. eCollection 2018.
5
Self-assessment in schizophrenia: Accuracy of evaluation of cognition and everyday functioning.精神分裂症的自我评估:认知与日常功能评估的准确性
Neuropsychology. 2015 Sep;29(5):675-82. doi: 10.1037/neu0000175. Epub 2015 Feb 2.
6
Metacognition in adult ADHD: subjective and objective perspectives on self-awareness of cognitive functioning.成人注意缺陷多动障碍中的元认知:对认知功能自我意识的主观和客观观点。
J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2021 Jul;128(7):939-955. doi: 10.1007/s00702-020-02293-w. Epub 2021 Jan 19.
7
Immediate post performance judgements about cognitive performance in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder: associations with test performance and subjective overall judgments regarding abilities.精神分裂症和双相情感障碍患者认知表现的即时后效判断:与测试表现的关联,以及对能力的主观整体判断。
Cogn Neuropsychiatry. 2023 Nov;28(6):450-466. doi: 10.1080/13546805.2023.2276972. Epub 2023 Nov 30.
8
Executive dysfunction in schizophrenia: Predictors of the discrepancy between subjective and objective measures.精神分裂症中的执行功能障碍:主观与客观测量差异的预测因素。
Schizophr Res Cogn. 2021 Jun 15;26:100201. doi: 10.1016/j.scog.2021.100201. eCollection 2021 Dec.
9
Autism symptoms, depression, and active social avoidance in schizophrenia: Association with self-reports and informant assessments of everyday functioning.精神分裂症患者的自闭症症状、抑郁和主动回避社交:与自我报告和日常功能知情者评估的关联。
J Psychiatr Res. 2019 Aug;115:36-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2019.05.010. Epub 2019 May 10.
10
[Subjective cognition in schizophrenia].[精神分裂症中的主观认知]
Encephale. 2017 Feb;43(1):15-20. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2016.01.002. Epub 2016 Feb 26.

引用本文的文献

1
The Relative Accuracy of Different Methods for Measuring Mind Wandering Subtypes: A Systematic Review.测量思维游荡亚型的不同方法的相对准确性:一项系统综述。
Brain Behav. 2025 Aug;15(8):e70764. doi: 10.1002/brb3.70764.
2
Self- and informant-reported cognitive concerns associated with primary brain tumour: systematic review.与原发性脑肿瘤相关的自我报告和他人报告的认知问题:系统评价
Support Care Cancer. 2025 Mar 21;33(4):310. doi: 10.1007/s00520-025-09345-5.
3
The Role of microRNA in Schizophrenia: A Scoping Review.microRNA 在精神分裂症中的作用:范围综述。
Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Jul 12;25(14):7673. doi: 10.3390/ijms25147673.
4
How Does Individual Psychotherapy Promote Recovery for Persons with Psychosis? A Systematic Review of Qualitative Studies to Understand the Patient's Experience.个体心理治疗如何促进精神病患者的康复?一项关于定性研究的系统综述,以了解患者的体验。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 May 30;14(6):460. doi: 10.3390/bs14060460.

本文引用的文献

1
Accuracy of immediate self-assessment of neurocognitive test performance: Associations with psychiatric diagnosis and longitudinal psychotic symptoms.即刻自我评估神经认知测试表现的准确性:与精神科诊断和纵向精神病症状的关联。
J Psychiatr Res. 2022 Dec;156:594-601. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2022.10.069. Epub 2022 Nov 4.
2
Identifying subgroups based on self-assessment of ability in patients with schizophrenia and its relationship with vocational outcomes.基于精神分裂症患者能力自我评估识别亚组及其与职业结局的关系。
Hong Kong J Occup Ther. 2022 Jun;35(1):35-43. doi: 10.1177/15691861221075715. Epub 2022 Feb 17.
3
Executive dysfunction in schizophrenia: Predictors of the discrepancy between subjective and objective measures.精神分裂症中的执行功能障碍:主观与客观测量差异的预测因素。
Schizophr Res Cogn. 2021 Jun 15;26:100201. doi: 10.1016/j.scog.2021.100201. eCollection 2021 Dec.
4
Using a Meta-cognitive Wisconsin Card Sorting Test to measure introspective accuracy and biases in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder.使用元认知威斯康星卡片分类测验测量精神分裂症和双相情感障碍的内省准确性和偏差。
J Psychiatr Res. 2021 Aug;140:436-442. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2021.06.016. Epub 2021 Jun 11.
5
The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
Int J Surg. 2021 Apr;88:105906. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.105906. Epub 2021 Mar 29.
6
Self-reported social functioning and social cognition in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder: Using ecological momentary assessment to identify the origin of bias.精神分裂症和双相情感障碍患者的自我报告社会功能和社会认知:使用生态瞬时评估来确定偏差的来源。
Schizophr Res. 2021 Apr;230:17-23. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2021.02.011. Epub 2021 Mar 2.
7
Accuracy of self-assessment of real-life functioning in schizophrenia.精神分裂症现实生活功能自我评估的准确性。
NPJ Schizophr. 2021 Feb 15;7(1):11. doi: 10.1038/s41537-021-00140-9.
8
Effect of disease related biases on the subjective assessment of social functioning in Alzheimer's disease and schizophrenia patients.疾病相关偏见对阿尔茨海默病和精神分裂症患者社会功能主观评估的影响。
J Psychiatr Res. 2022 Jan;145:302-308. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2020.11.013. Epub 2020 Nov 9.
9
Using Patient-Centered Assessment in Schizophrenia Care: Defining Recovery and Discussing Concerns and Preferences.在精神分裂症护理中使用以患者为中心的评估:定义康复并讨论关注点和偏好。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2020 Apr 14;81(3):MS19053BR2C. doi: 10.4088/JCP.MS19053BR2C.
10
Quality of self-reported cognition: effects of age and gender on spatial navigation self-reports.自我报告认知的质量:年龄和性别对空间导航自我报告的影响。
Aging Ment Health. 2021 May;25(5):873-878. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2020.1742658. Epub 2020 Apr 1.

精神分裂症患者认知与功能能力主观和客观评估之间的差异:一项系统综述

The Discrepancy between Subjective and Objective Evaluations of Cognitive and Functional Ability among People with Schizophrenia: A Systematic Review.

作者信息

Harris Molly, Blanco Emily, Howie Hunter, Rempfer Melisa

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, MO 64110-2499, USA.

Department of Psychology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045, USA.

出版信息

Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Dec 30;14(1):30. doi: 10.3390/bs14010030.

DOI:10.3390/bs14010030
PMID:38247682
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10812940/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

An important aspect of recovery in schizophrenia relates to one's subjective, lived experience. Self-report is a subjective measurement method with yet-uncertain utility in the assessment of functioning among individuals diagnosed with schizophrenia-spectrum disorder. No review to date has comprehensively synthesized existing research to evaluate the degree of correspondence, or lack thereof, between subjective and objective assessments of cognitive and everyday functioning, nor how extant data can inform the use of self-reported information in treatment and research.

METHODS

A systematic review was completed to provide a broad perspective of the literature on this topic. Relevant manuscripts were identified via a search strategy using key terms in PubMed and PsycINFO and a review of manuscript bibliographies. Twenty-six studies met the inclusion criteria.

RESULTS

These studies show minimal to modest associations between subjective assessments of cognition and everyday functioning and objective assessments of these domains, including informant reports and neuropsychological and behavioral measures. Individuals with schizophrenia appear to overestimate their functioning when compared to objective measures. Depression and greater cognitive ability tend to predict greater correspondence between subjective and objective assessments of cognition and everyday functioning.

DISCUSSION

This review discusses how we might understand the low correspondence between subjective and objective measures of functioning and provides recommendations for using and eliciting self-reported information in the pursuit of recovery-centered practices.

摘要

背景

精神分裂症康复的一个重要方面与个体的主观生活体验有关。自我报告是一种主观测量方法,在评估精神分裂症谱系障碍患者的功能方面,其效用尚不确定。迄今为止,尚无综述全面综合现有研究,以评估认知和日常功能的主观评估与客观评估之间的相符程度(或缺乏相符性),也未探讨现有数据如何为治疗和研究中自我报告信息的使用提供参考。

方法

完成了一项系统综述,以全面了解关于该主题的文献。通过在PubMed和PsycINFO中使用关键词的检索策略以及对手稿参考文献的回顾来识别相关手稿。26项研究符合纳入标准。

结果

这些研究表明,认知和日常功能的主观评估与这些领域的客观评估(包括 informant 报告以及神经心理学和行为测量)之间的关联极小至中等。与客观测量相比,精神分裂症患者似乎高估了自己的功能。抑郁和较高的认知能力往往预示着认知和日常功能的主观评估与客观评估之间具有更高的相符性。

讨论

本综述讨论了我们如何理解功能的主观测量与客观测量之间的低相符性,并为在以康复为中心的实践中使用和获取自我报告信息提供了建议。