Denney Joshua A, Capanni Francesca, Herrera Phabiola, Dulanto Augusto, Roldan Rollin, Paz Enrique, Jaymez Amador A, Chirinos Eduardo E, Portugal Jose, Quispe Rocio, Brower Roy G, Checkley William
Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA.
Biomedical Research Unit, Asociación Benéfica PRISMA, Lima, Peru.
BMJ Open. 2015 Jan 16;5(1):e005803. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005803.
Mechanical ventilation is a cornerstone in the management of critically ill patients worldwide; however, less is known about the clinical management of mechanically ventilated patients in low and middle income countries where limitation of resources including equipment, staff and access to medical information may play an important role in defining patient-centred outcomes. We present the design of a prospective, longitudinal study of mechanically ventilated patients in Peru that aims to describe a large cohort of mechanically ventilated patients and identify practices that, if modified, could result in improved patient-centred outcomes and lower costs.
Five Peruvian intensive care units (ICUs) and the Medical ICU at the Johns Hopkins Hospital were selected for this study. Eligible patients were those who underwent at least 24 h of invasive mechanical ventilation within the first 48 h of admission into the ICU. Information on ventilator settings, clinical management and treatment were collected daily for up to 28 days or until the patient was discharged from the unit. Vital status was assessed at 90 days post enrolment. A subset of participants who survived until hospital discharge were asked to participate in an ancillary study to assess vital status, and physical and mental health at 6, 12, 24 and 60 months after hospitalisation, Primary outcomes include 90-day mortality, time on mechanical ventilation, hospital and ICU lengths of stay, and prevalence of acute respiratory distress syndrome. In subsequent analyses, we aim to identify interventions and standardised care strategies that can be tailored to resource-limited settings and that result in improved patient-centred outcomes and lower costs.
We obtained ethics approval from each of the four participating hospitals in Lima, Peru, and at the Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA. Results will be disseminated as several separate publications in different international journals.
机械通气是全球危重症患者管理的基石;然而,在低收入和中等收入国家,对于接受机械通气患者的临床管理了解较少,在这些国家,包括设备、人员和获取医疗信息在内的资源限制可能在确定以患者为中心的结局方面发挥重要作用。我们展示了一项针对秘鲁接受机械通气患者的前瞻性纵向研究设计,该研究旨在描述一大群接受机械通气的患者,并确定那些若加以改进可能会带来更好的以患者为中心的结局和更低成本的做法。
本研究选取了秘鲁的五个重症监护病房(ICU)以及美国约翰霍普金斯医院的医学ICU。符合条件的患者是那些在入住ICU的头48小时内接受至少24小时有创机械通气的患者。每天收集有关呼吸机设置、临床管理和治疗的信息,最长收集28天,或直至患者出院。在入组后90天评估生命状态。一部分存活至出院的参与者被要求参加一项辅助研究,以评估住院后6、12、24和60个月的生命状态以及身心健康状况。主要结局包括90天死亡率、机械通气时间、住院和ICU住院时长以及急性呼吸窘迫综合征的患病率。在后续分析中,我们旨在确定可针对资源有限环境进行调整的干预措施和标准化护理策略,这些措施能带来更好的以患者为中心的结局并降低成本。
我们获得了秘鲁利马的四家参与医院以及美国巴尔的摩约翰霍普金斯医学院的伦理批准。研究结果将以多篇独立论文的形式发表在不同的国际期刊上。