Elmore Alexis L, Nigg Joel T, Friderici Karen H, Jernigan Katherine, Nikolas Molly A
a Department of Psychology , University of Iowa.
b Department of Psychiatry , Oregon Health and Science University.
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2016;45(3):348-60. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2014.979935. Epub 2015 Jan 20.
Problematic family dynamics are common among youth with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Multiple mechanisms, including diathesis-stress (vulnerability) and differential susceptibility Gene × Environment interaction effects (G × E), have been proposed to account for this association. G × E effects for ADHD were examined via interactions between a genetic marker hypothesized to influence sensitivity to the environment (the promoter polymorphism of the serotonin transporter gene -5HTTLPR) and family conflict and cohesion in predicting ADHD symptoms. There were 498 youth ages 6-17 years (251 ADHD, 213 non-ADHD) and their parents who completed a multistage, multi-informant assessment (including parent and youth reports on the Family Environment Scale), and saliva sample collection for genotyping. Linear regression analyses examined interactions between 5HTTLPR genotype and the Family Environment Scale scales of conflict and cohesion reported by parent and child. Criteria laid out by Roisman et al. ( 2012 ) were applied to evaluate diathesis stress versus differential susceptibility G × E mechanisms. Results demonstrated interactions between 5HTTLPR genotype and both conflict and cohesion in predicting inattention but not hyperactivity-impulsivity. Both interactions were highly consistent with differential susceptibility models of G × E effects. 5HTTLPR genotype appeared to moderate the relationship between family conflict/cohesion and inattentive symptoms. Interactions highlight the role of 5HTTLPR genotype as a potential marker of environmental sensitivity and provide support for differential susceptibility models of G × E effects for ADHD.
问题性家庭动态在患有注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)的青少年中很常见。人们提出了多种机制来解释这种关联,包括素质应激(易感性)和差异易感性基因×环境交互效应(G×E)。通过一个假设会影响对环境敏感性的基因标记(血清素转运体基因启动子多态性-5HTTLPR)与家庭冲突和凝聚力之间的交互作用,来检验ADHD的G×E效应,以预测ADHD症状。共有498名6至17岁的青少年(251名ADHD患者,213名非ADHD患者)及其父母完成了一项多阶段、多 informant 评估(包括父母和青少年关于家庭环境量表的报告),并采集了唾液样本进行基因分型。线性回归分析检验了5HTTLPR基因型与父母和孩子报告的家庭环境量表冲突和凝聚力量表之间的交互作用。应用Roisman等人(2012年)制定的标准来评估素质应激与差异易感性G×E机制。结果表明,在预测注意力不集中而非多动冲动方面存在5HTTLPR基因型与冲突和凝聚力之间的交互作用。这两种交互作用都与G×E效应的差异易感性模型高度一致。5HTTLPR基因型似乎调节了家庭冲突/凝聚力与注意力不集中症状之间的关系。交互作用凸显了5HTTLPR基因型作为环境敏感性潜在标记的作用,并为ADHD的G×E效应差异易感性模型提供了支持。