Howden S Mark, Soussana Jean-François, Tubiello Francesco N, Chhetri Netra, Dunlop Michael, Meinke Holger
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization, Sustainable Ecosystems, GPO Box 284, Canberra ACT 2601, Australia.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Dec 11;104(50):19691-6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0701890104. Epub 2007 Dec 6.
The strong trends in climate change already evident, the likelihood of further changes occurring, and the increasing scale of potential climate impacts give urgency to addressing agricultural adaptation more coherently. There are many potential adaptation options available for marginal change of existing agricultural systems, often variations of existing climate risk management. We show that implementation of these options is likely to have substantial benefits under moderate climate change for some cropping systems. However, there are limits to their effectiveness under more severe climate changes. Hence, more systemic changes in resource allocation need to be considered, such as targeted diversification of production systems and livelihoods. We argue that achieving increased adaptation action will necessitate integration of climate change-related issues with other risk factors, such as climate variability and market risk, and with other policy domains, such as sustainable development. Dealing with the many barriers to effective adaptation will require a comprehensive and dynamic policy approach covering a range of scales and issues, for example, from the understanding by farmers of change in risk profiles to the establishment of efficient markets that facilitate response strategies. Science, too, has to adapt. Multidisciplinary problems require multidisciplinary solutions, i.e., a focus on integrated rather than disciplinary science and a strengthening of the interface with decision makers. A crucial component of this approach is the implementation of adaptation assessment frameworks that are relevant, robust, and easily operated by all stakeholders, practitioners, policymakers, and scientists.
气候变化的强劲趋势已然明显,进一步变化的可能性以及潜在气候影响的规模不断扩大,这使得更协调一致地应对农业适应问题变得刻不容缓。对于现有农业系统的微小变化,有许多潜在的适应选项可供选择,这些选项通常是现有气候风险管理的变体。我们表明,在适度气候变化下,实施这些选项对某些种植系统可能会带来巨大益处。然而,在更严峻的气候变化下,它们的有效性是有限的。因此,需要考虑资源分配方面更具系统性的变化,例如生产系统和生计的有针对性的多样化。我们认为,要实现更多的适应行动,就必须将与气候变化相关的问题与其他风险因素(如气候多变性和市场风险)以及其他政策领域(如可持续发展)整合起来。应对有效适应的诸多障碍需要一种全面且动态的政策方法,涵盖一系列规模和问题,例如,从农民对风险状况变化的理解到建立促进应对策略的高效市场。科学也必须进行调整。多学科问题需要多学科解决方案,即关注综合科学而非学科科学,并加强与决策者的联系。这种方法的一个关键组成部分是实施适应评估框架,这些框架要相关、稳健且易于所有利益相关者、从业者、政策制定者和科学家操作。