Suppr超能文献

头孢唑林与氯唑西林作为耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌脊柱硬膜外脓肿的确定性抗生素治疗:一项回顾性队列研究。

Cefazolin versus cloxacillin as definitive antibiotic therapy for methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus spinal epidural abscess: a retrospective cohort study.

机构信息

Health Research Methodology Program, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

Division of Infectious Diseases, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2021 Nov;58(5):106429. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2021.106429. Epub 2021 Aug 29.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

We compared the effectiveness of cefazolin and cloxacillin as definitive antibiotic therapy for methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) spinal epidural abscess (SEA).

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included patients with MSSA SEA from two academic hospitals in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, between 2014 and 2020. Patients treated with cefazolin were compared to those treated with cloxacillin. Co-primary outcomes included 90-day mortality, antibiotic failure, adverse reactions and recurrence. Inverse probability of treatment weighting using propensity scores was used to balance important prognostic factors and to estimate an adjusted risk difference.

RESULTS

Of 98 patients with MSSA SEA, 50 and 48 patients were treated with cefazolin and cloxacillin, respectively. Mortality at 90 days was 8% and 13% in the cefazolin and cloxacillin groups, respectively (P = 0.52). The antibiotic failure rate was 12% and 19% in the cefazolin and cloxacillin groups, respectively (P = 0.41). The serious adverse reactions rate was 0% and 4% in the cefazolin and cloxacillin groups, respectively (P = 0.24). The recurrence rate was 2% and 8% in the cefazolin and cloxacillin groups, respectively (P = 0.20). The adjusted risk difference for mortality at 90 days was -1% [95% confidence interval (CI) -10% to 8%] favouring cefazolin. The adjusted risk differences for antibiotic failure, adverse reactions and recurrence were 1% (95% CI -12% to 14%), -5% (95% CI -11% to 2%) and -18% (-36% to -1%) respectively.

CONCLUSION

Cefazolin is likely as effective as an antistaphylococcal penicillin and may be considered as a first-line treatment for MSSA SEA.

摘要

目的

我们比较了头孢唑林和氯唑西林作为治疗耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MSSA)脊柱硬膜外脓肿(SEA)的确定性抗生素治疗的效果。

方法

这项回顾性队列研究纳入了 2014 年至 2020 年期间在加拿大安大略省汉密尔顿的两家学术医院就诊的 MSSA SEA 患者。比较了使用头孢唑林治疗的患者和使用氯唑西林治疗的患者。主要结局包括 90 天死亡率、抗生素失败、不良反应和复发。使用倾向评分进行逆概率治疗加权以平衡重要的预后因素,并估计调整后的风险差异。

结果

在 98 例 MSSA SEA 患者中,分别有 50 例和 48 例患者接受了头孢唑林和氯唑西林治疗。头孢唑林组和氯唑西林组 90 天死亡率分别为 8%和 13%(P=0.52)。头孢唑林组和氯唑西林组的抗生素失败率分别为 12%和 19%(P=0.41)。头孢唑林组和氯唑西林组严重不良反应发生率分别为 0%和 4%(P=0.24)。头孢唑林组和氯唑西林组的复发率分别为 2%和 8%(P=0.20)。90 天死亡率的调整风险差异为-1%(95%置信区间(CI)-10%至 8%),有利于头孢唑林。抗生素失败、不良反应和复发的调整风险差异分别为 1%(95% CI-12%至 14%)、-5%(95% CI-11%至 2%)和-18%(-36%至-1%)。

结论

头孢唑林可能与抗葡萄球菌青霉素一样有效,可考虑作为 MSSA SEA 的一线治疗药物。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验