Suppr超能文献

氯唑西林与头孢唑林治疗甲氧西林敏感菌血症的疗效比较(CloCeBa):一项随机对照非劣效性试验的研究方案

Efficacy of cloxacillin versus cefazolin for methicillin-susceptible bacteraemia (CloCeBa): study protocol for a randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial.

作者信息

Burdet Charles, Loubet Paul, Le Moing Vincent, Vindrios William, Esposito-Farèse Marina, Linard Morgane, Ferry Tristan, Massias Laurent, Tattevin Pierre, Wolff Michel, Vandenesch François, Grall Nathalie, Quintin Caroline, Mentré France, Duval Xavier, Lescure François-Xavier

机构信息

IAME, UMR 1137, INSERM, Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, INSERM, Paris, France.

Hôpital Bichat Claude Bernard-Département d'Epidémiologie, Biostatistiques et recherche Clinique, Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Paris, Paris, France.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2018 Sep 1;8(8):e023151. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023151.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Methicillin-susceptible (MSSA) bacteraemia is a common and severe disease responsible for approximately 65 000 deaths every year in Europe. Intravenous antistaphylococcal penicillins (ASP) such as cloxacillin are the current recommended antibiotics. However, increasing reports of toxicity and recurrent stock-outs of ASP prompted healthcare providers to seek for alternative antibiotic treatment. Based on retrospective studies, cefazolin, a first-generation cephalosporin, is recommended in patients at risk of severe ASP-associated toxicity.We hypothesised that cefazolin has a non-inferior efficacy in comparison to cloxacillin, with a better safety profile for the treatment of MSSA bacteraemia.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The CloCeBa trial is an open-label, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial conducted in academic centres throughout France. Eligible patients are adults with MSSA bacteraemia without intravascular device or suspicion of central nervous system infection. Patients will be randomised (1:1) to receive either cloxacillin or cefazolin by the intravenous route, for the first 14 days of therapy. The evaluation criteria is a composite criteria of negative blood cultures at day 5, survival, absence of relapse and clinical success at day 90 after randomisation. Secondary evaluation criteria include both efficacy and safety assessments. Three ancillary studies are planned to describe the epidemiology of β-lactamase encoding genes, the ecological impact and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameters of cefazolin and cloxacillin. Including 300 patients will provide 80% power to demonstrate the non-inferiority of cefazolin over cloxacillin, assuming 85% success rate with cloxacillin and taking into account loss-to-follow-up, with a 0.12 non-inferiority margin and a one-sided type I error of 0.025.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This protocol received authorisation from the ethics committee Sud-Est I on 13 November 2017 (2017-87-PP)and French National Agency for Medicines and Health Products (170661A-43). Results will be disseminated to the scientific community through congresses and publication in peer-reviewed journals.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03248063 and 2017-003967-36.

摘要

引言

甲氧西林敏感(MSSA)菌血症是一种常见且严重的疾病,在欧洲每年导致约65000人死亡。静脉注射抗葡萄球菌青霉素(ASP)如氯唑西林是目前推荐使用的抗生素。然而,关于ASP毒性增加以及反复缺货的报道促使医疗服务提供者寻求替代抗生素治疗方法。基于回顾性研究,第一代头孢菌素头孢唑林被推荐用于有严重ASP相关毒性风险的患者。我们假设头孢唑林与氯唑西林相比疗效不劣,且在治疗MSSA菌血症方面具有更好的安全性。

方法与分析

CloCeBa试验是一项在法国各地学术中心进行的开放标签、随机、对照、非劣效性试验。符合条件的患者为患有MSSA菌血症的成年人,无血管内装置或无中枢神经系统感染嫌疑。患者将按1:1随机分组,在治疗的前14天通过静脉途径接受氯唑西林或头孢唑林治疗。评估标准是随机分组后第5天血培养阴性、生存、无复发以及第90天临床成功的综合标准。次要评估标准包括疗效和安全性评估。计划进行三项辅助研究,以描述β-内酰胺酶编码基因的流行病学、头孢唑林和氯唑西林的生态影响以及药代动力学/药效学参数。假设氯唑西林成功率为85%,并考虑失访情况,纳入300例患者将有80%的把握度证明头孢唑林不劣于氯唑西林,非劣效界值为0.12,单侧I类错误为0.025。

伦理与传播

本方案于2017年11月13日获得东南I伦理委员会(2017 - 87 - PP)以及法国国家药品和健康产品管理局(170661A - 43)的批准。研究结果将通过学术会议和在同行评审期刊上发表的方式传播给科学界。

试验注册号

NCT03248063和2017 - 003967 - 36。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5a2/6120654/6474305206d0/bmjopen-2018-023151f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验