Altman Lara, Kuhlmann Anne K Sebert, Galavotti Christine
MANILA Consulting Group, Inc., 1420 Beverly Road Suite 220, McLean, VA 22101, USA; CARE USA, 51 Ellis Street, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA.
MANILA Consulting Group, Inc., 1420 Beverly Road Suite 220, McLean, VA 22101, USA; George Warren Brown School of Social Work, Washington University in St. Louis, Campus Box 1196, One Brookings Drive, St. Louis, MO 63130, USA.
Eval Program Plann. 2015 Apr;49:86-97. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2014.11.010. Epub 2014 Dec 17.
Community mobilization (CM) interventions are often used to improve sexual, reproductive, and maternal health (SRMH). This systematic review provides an overview of CM indicators used in evaluation and then focuses on the use of linking constructs-those measures of the process of CM between programmatic outputs and outcomes. We identified 108 English-language articles evaluating 86 CM interventions that target SRMH. Content analysis was used to code CM indicators into five categories: qualitative descriptions of CM; participation, diffusion and community action indicators that measure tangible, programmatic outputs; and linking constructs that capture the process of moving from participation to empowerment. Fifty-five (64.0%) interventions include a CM indicator. Diffusion indicators are most common (56.4%); linking constructs are least common (20.0%). We found 23 linking constructs used in evaluations of 11 interventions, with limited information on psychometric properties available. Three evaluations report positive relationships between linking constructs and condom use, one of which was significant in multivariate analysis. To better understand how CM leads to improved outcomes, we recommend increasing the measurement of linking constructs in evaluations of CM interventions. Research should focus on developing and validating new linking construct indicators and better disseminating existing measurement tools.
社区动员(CM)干预措施常被用于改善性健康、生殖健康和孕产妇健康(SRMH)。本系统综述概述了评估中使用的CM指标,然后重点关注关联结构的使用——即那些衡量CM在项目产出与结果之间过程的指标。我们检索到108篇评估针对SRMH的86项CM干预措施的英文文章。采用内容分析法将CM指标编码为五类:CM的定性描述;衡量实际项目产出的参与、传播和社区行动指标;以及反映从参与到赋权过程的关联结构。55项(64.0%)干预措施包含CM指标。传播指标最为常见(56.4%);关联结构最不常见(20.0%)。我们在11项干预措施的评估中发现了23种关联结构,但关于其心理测量特性的信息有限。三项评估报告了关联结构与避孕套使用之间的正相关关系,其中一项在多变量分析中具有显著性。为了更好地理解CM如何带来更好的结果,我们建议在CM干预措施的评估中增加对关联结构的测量。研究应专注于开发和验证新的关联结构指标,并更好地推广现有的测量工具。