• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

双侧减压单侧椎板切开术后硬脊膜囊横截面积的术后扩大:与临床症状的相关性

Postoperative expansion of dural sac cross-sectional area after unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression: correlation with clinical symptoms.

作者信息

Chung Seok-Won, Kang Min-Soo, Shin Yong-Hwan, Baek Oon-Ki, Lee Sang-Ho

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Daegu Wooridul Spine Hospital, Daegu, Korea.

Department of Neurosurgery, Wooridul Spine Hospital, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Korean J Spine. 2014 Dec;11(4):227-31. doi: 10.14245/kjs.2014.11.4.227. Epub 2014 Dec 31.

DOI:10.14245/kjs.2014.11.4.227
PMID:25620982
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4303278/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Dural sac cross-sectional area (DSCSA) is a way to measure the degree of central spinal canal compression. The objective was to investigate the correlation between the expansion ratio of DSCSA after unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression (ULBD) and the clinical results for lumbar spinal stenosis.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the clinical data and radiographs of 103 patients who underwent ULBD for symptomatic spinal stenosis in one year. We compared preoperative and postoperative clinical data and DSCSA and evaluated the correlation between clinical and radiographic measurements.

RESULTS

There was a significant increase of DSCSA after ULBD (p=0.000) and mean expansion ratio of DSCSA was 203.7±147.2%(range -32.9-826.1%). Clinical outcomes, measured by VAS and ODI were improved significantly not only in early postoperative period, but also in the last follow-up. However, there were no statistically significant correlations between the preoperative DSCSA and clinical symptoms, Perioperative expansion ratio of DSCSA and clinical parameters were also not correlated to the improvement of clinical symptoms significantly in both early postoperative phase and last follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Our result indicates that the DSCSA itself has a definite limitation to be correlated to the clinical symptoms, and thus meticulous correlation between the clinical presentation and MRI imaging is essential in determination of surgical treatment.

摘要

目的

硬脊膜囊横截面积(DSCSA)是一种测量中央椎管狭窄程度的方法。本研究旨在探讨双侧减压单侧椎板切开术(ULBD)后DSCSA的扩大率与腰椎管狭窄症临床疗效之间的相关性。

方法

回顾性分析103例因症状性椎管狭窄在1年内接受ULBD治疗患者的临床资料和影像学资料。比较术前和术后的临床资料及DSCSA,并评估临床测量与影像学测量之间的相关性。

结果

ULBD术后DSCSA显著增加(p = 0.000),DSCSA的平均扩大率为203.7±147.2%(范围-32.9-826.1%)。以视觉模拟评分法(VAS)和腰椎功能障碍指数(ODI)衡量的临床疗效不仅在术后早期显著改善,在末次随访时也有显著改善。然而,术前DSCSA与临床症状之间无统计学显著相关性,DSCSA的围手术期扩大率与临床参数在术后早期和末次随访时也均与临床症状的改善无显著相关性。

结论

我们的结果表明,DSCSA本身与临床症状的相关性存在一定局限性,因此在确定手术治疗时,临床表现与磁共振成像之间的细致关联至关重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d39/4303278/976307635704/kjs-11-227-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d39/4303278/a0ec975373d2/kjs-11-227-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d39/4303278/929d74316942/kjs-11-227-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d39/4303278/976307635704/kjs-11-227-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d39/4303278/a0ec975373d2/kjs-11-227-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d39/4303278/929d74316942/kjs-11-227-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d39/4303278/976307635704/kjs-11-227-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Postoperative expansion of dural sac cross-sectional area after unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression: correlation with clinical symptoms.双侧减压单侧椎板切开术后硬脊膜囊横截面积的术后扩大:与临床症状的相关性
Korean J Spine. 2014 Dec;11(4):227-31. doi: 10.14245/kjs.2014.11.4.227. Epub 2014 Dec 31.
2
Comparison of biportal endoscopic technique and uniportal endoscopic technique in Unilateral Laminectomy for Bilateral Decomprssion (ULBD) for lumbar spinal stenosis.双侧减压单侧入路内镜下腰椎间孔切开术与单通道内镜下腰椎间孔切开术治疗腰椎管狭窄症的比较。
Asian J Surg. 2024 Jan;47(1):112-117. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2023.05.068. Epub 2023 Jun 17.
3
Laminarthrectomy as a surgical approach for decompressing the spinal canal: assessment of preoperative versus postoperative dural sac cross-sectional areal (DSCSA).脊板切除术作为一种椎管减压的手术方法:术前与术后硬脊膜囊横截面积(DSCSA)的评估。
Eur Spine J. 2013 Aug;22(8):1913-9. doi: 10.1007/s00586-013-2737-1. Epub 2013 Mar 15.
4
Clinical efficacy and imaging outcomes of unilateral biportal endoscopy with unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression in the treatment of severe lumbar spinal stenosis.单侧双门内镜联合单侧椎板切开术双侧减压治疗重度腰椎管狭窄症的临床疗效及影像学结果
Front Surg. 2023 Jan 6;9:1061566. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1061566. eCollection 2022.
5
Remodeling Pattern of Spinal Canal after Full Endoscopic Uniportal Lumbar Endoscopic Unilateral Laminotomy for Bilateral Decompression: One Year Repetitive MRI and Clinical Follow-Up Evaluation.全内镜下单侧椎板切开双侧减压治疗腰椎管狭窄症术后椎管重塑模式:一年期重复MRI及临床随访评估
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Mar 24;12(4):793. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12040793.
6
Comparative analysis of three types of minimally invasive decompressive surgery for lumbar central stenosis: biportal endoscopy, uniportal endoscopy, and microsurgery.三种微创减压手术治疗腰椎中央型狭窄的对比分析:双通道内镜、单通道内镜和显微镜手术。
Neurosurg Focus. 2019 May 1;46(5):E9. doi: 10.3171/2019.2.FOCUS197.
7
Comparison of full-endoscopic and minimally invasive decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis in the setting of degenerative scoliosis and spondylolisthesis.全内窥镜与微创减压治疗退行性脊柱侧凸与脊柱滑脱伴腰椎管狭窄症的比较。
Neurosurg Focus. 2019 May 1;46(5):E16. doi: 10.3171/2019.2.FOCUS195.
8
Unilateral Laminotomy with Bilateral Decompression: A Case Series Studying One- and Two-Year Outcomes with Predictors of Minimal Clinical Improvement.单侧椎板切除术联合双侧减压:一项研究一年和两年结局的病例系列研究,探讨了微小临床改善的预测因素。
World Neurosurg. 2019 Nov;131:e290-e297. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.07.144. Epub 2019 Jul 26.
9
Long-term clinical outcomes after bilateral laminotomy or total laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: a single-institution experience.双侧椎板切开术或全椎板切除术治疗腰椎管狭窄症的长期临床疗效:单中心经验。
Neurosurg Focus. 2019 May 1;46(5):E2. doi: 10.3171/2019.2.FOCUS18651.
10
Extent of decompression and incidence of postoperative epidural hematoma among different techniques of spinal decompression in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.退行性腰椎管狭窄症不同脊柱减压技术的减压范围及术后硬膜外血肿发生率
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2013 Dec;26(8):407-14. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e31824a03eb.

引用本文的文献

1
[Early effectiveness of posterior 180-degree decompression via unilateral biportal endoscopy in treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis combined with MSU-1 lumbar disc herniation].[经单侧双通道内镜下后路180°减压治疗腰椎管狭窄症合并MSU-1型腰椎间盘突出症的早期疗效]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2025 Jun 15;39(6):735-740. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202504083.
2
Comparison of 3 Different Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.比较三种不同微创外科技术治疗腰椎管狭窄症的随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Mar 1;5(3):e224291. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.4291.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Study of dural sac cross-sectional area in early and late phases after lumbar decompression surgery.腰椎减压术后早、晚期硬脊膜囊横截面积的研究。
Spine J. 2013 Sep;13(9):1088-94. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.03.057. Epub 2013 Jul 10.
2
Laminarthrectomy as a surgical approach for decompressing the spinal canal: assessment of preoperative versus postoperative dural sac cross-sectional areal (DSCSA).脊板切除术作为一种椎管减压的手术方法:术前与术后硬脊膜囊横截面积(DSCSA)的评估。
Eur Spine J. 2013 Aug;22(8):1913-9. doi: 10.1007/s00586-013-2737-1. Epub 2013 Mar 15.
3
Correlation between disability and MRI findings in lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective study of 109 patients operated on by decompression.
Minimally Invasive Lumbar Spinal Decompression in Elderly Patients with Magnetic Resonance Imaging Morphological Analysis.
老年患者微创腰椎减压的磁共振成像形态学分析
Asian Spine J. 2018 Apr;12(2):285-293. doi: 10.4184/asj.2018.12.2.285. Epub 2018 Apr 16.
4
Tumor Occupation in the Spinal Canal and Clinical Symptoms of Cauda Equina Schwannoma: An Analysis of 22 Cases.椎管内肿瘤占位及马尾神经鞘瘤的临床症状:22例分析
Asian Spine J. 2016 Dec;10(6):1079-1084. doi: 10.4184/asj.2016.10.6.1079. Epub 2016 Dec 8.
腰椎管狭窄症患者的残疾程度与 MRI 表现的相关性:109 例减压手术患者的前瞻性研究。
Acta Orthop. 2011 Apr;82(2):204-10. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2011.566150. Epub 2011 Mar 24.
4
Dynamic change of dural sac cross-sectional area in axial loaded magnetic resonance imaging correlates with the severity of clinical symptoms in patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis.轴向加载磁共振成像中硬脊膜囊横截面积的动态变化与腰椎椎管狭窄症患者临床症状的严重程度相关。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Feb 1;37(3):207-13. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182134e73.
5
Lumbar spinal stenosis in elderly patients: is a unilateral microsurgical approach sufficient for decompression?老年患者腰椎管狭窄症:单侧微创手术减压足够吗?
J Neurosurg Spine. 2011 Mar;14(3):305-12. doi: 10.3171/2010.10.SPINE09708. Epub 2011 Jan 14.
6
A comparison of unilateral and bilateral laminotomies for decompression of L4-L5 spinal stenosis.L4-L5 椎管狭窄症减压的单侧和双侧椎板切开术比较。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Feb 1;36(3):E172-8. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181db998c.
7
Gait analysis does not correlate with clinical and MR imaging parameters in patients with symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis.在有症状的腰椎管狭窄症患者中,步态分析与临床及磁共振成像参数不相关。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2008 Jun 20;9:89. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-9-89.
8
Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: correlation with Oswestry Disability Index and MR imaging.退行性腰椎管狭窄症:与奥斯威斯利功能障碍指数及磁共振成像的相关性
Eur Spine J. 2008 May;17(5):679-85. doi: 10.1007/s00586-008-0646-5. Epub 2008 Mar 7.
9
Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: analysis of results in a series of 374 patients treated with unilateral laminotomy for bilateral microdecompression.退行性腰椎管狭窄症:374例行单侧椎板切开双侧显微减压术患者的结果分析
J Neurosurg Spine. 2007 Dec;7(6):579-86. doi: 10.3171/SPI-07/12/579.
10
Midterm outcome after unilateral approach for bilateral decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis: 5-year prospective study.单侧入路双侧减压治疗腰椎管狭窄症的中期疗效:5年前瞻性研究
Eur Spine J. 2007 Dec;16(12):2133-42. doi: 10.1007/s00586-007-0471-2. Epub 2007 Aug 22.