• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单侧双门内镜联合单侧椎板切开术双侧减压治疗重度腰椎管狭窄症的临床疗效及影像学结果

Clinical efficacy and imaging outcomes of unilateral biportal endoscopy with unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression in the treatment of severe lumbar spinal stenosis.

作者信息

Hu Yutong, Fu Hao, Yang Dongfang, Xu Weibing

机构信息

Graduate School, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China.

Department of Spine Surgery, Dalian Municipal Central Hospital, Dalian, China.

出版信息

Front Surg. 2023 Jan 6;9:1061566. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1061566. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fsurg.2022.1061566
PMID:36684266
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9852342/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the clinical efficacy and imaging outcomes of unilateral biportal endoscopy (UBE) with unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression (ULBD) in the treatment of severe lumbar spinal stenosis (SLSS).

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 50 patients with SLSS treated with UBE-ULBD from October 2018 to March 2021. Visual analog scale (VAS) for back and legs pain, Oswestry disability index (ODI), modified Macnab criteria, complications, hospital stay, preoperative and postoperative dural sac cross-sectional area (DSCA) and Schizas grade, mean angle of facetectomy and osseous lateral recess decompression rate were examined.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up period was 10.7 months. The mean hospital stay was 2.76 ± 1.02 days. At the final follow-up, VAS for back pain and legs pain decreased from 7.22 ± 0.95 to 1.26 ± 0.44 and from 7.88 ± 0.69 to 1.18 ± 0.39, respectively; ODI decreased from 69.88 ± 6.32% to 14.96 ± 2.75%. According to the modified Macnab criteria, the results were excellent in 24 (48%), good in 22 (44%), and fair in 4 (8%). Excellent or good results (a satisfactory outcome) were obtained in 92% of the patients. There were 2 cases of complications of dural sac tear. The postoperative DSCA was significantly enlarged compared with that before surgery, from 44.74 ± 9.85 to 126.86 ± 14.81 mm. According to Schizas grade, the stenosis grade changes from preoperative grade C in 16 cases, grade D in 34 cases, to postoperative grade A in 40 cases, and grade B in 10 cases. The mean angle of facetectomy of the ipsilateral facet joint was 70.87 ± 5.68 , contralateral was 65.07 ± 4.98 . The decompression rate was 70.81 ± 4.43% (ipsilateral side) and 71.22 ± 3.68% (contralateral).

CONCLUSIONS

UBE-ULBD has a good clinical effect in the treatment of SLSS, and has achieved satisfactory results in spinal canal enlargement, undercutting of facet joints, and decompression effect. It is a safe and effective surgical for SLSS.

摘要

目的

探讨单侧双通道内镜(UBE)联合单侧椎板切开双侧减压(ULBD)治疗重度腰椎管狭窄症(SLSS)的临床疗效及影像学结果。

方法

回顾性分析2018年10月至2021年3月采用UBE-ULBD治疗的50例SLSS患者。检测腰腿痛视觉模拟量表(VAS)、Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)、改良Macnab标准、并发症、住院时间、术前和术后硬脊膜囊横截面积(DSCA)及Schizas分级、平均关节突切除角度和骨性侧隐窝减压率。

结果

平均随访时间为10.7个月。平均住院时间为2.76±1.02天。末次随访时,腰背痛VAS评分从7.22±0.95降至1.26±0.44,腿痛VAS评分从7.88±0.69降至1.18±0.39;ODI从69.88±6.32%降至14.96±2.75%。根据改良Macnab标准,结果为优24例(48%),良22例(44%),可4例(8%)。92%的患者获得了优或良的结果(满意结果)。有2例硬脊膜囊撕裂并发症。术后DSCA较术前显著增大,从44.74±9.85增至126.86±14.81 mm。根据Schizas分级,狭窄程度从术前16例C级、34例D级,变为术后40例A级、10例B级。同侧关节突关节平均关节突切除角度为70.87±5.68°,对侧为65.07±4.98°。减压率同侧为70.81±4.43%,对侧为71.22±3.68%。

结论

UBE-ULBD治疗SLSS临床效果良好,在椎管扩大、关节突关节咬除及减压效果方面均取得满意结果。它是一种治疗SLSS安全有效的手术方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f228/9852342/d810be4a781e/fsurg-09-1061566-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f228/9852342/35f4c0e2d7e9/fsurg-09-1061566-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f228/9852342/e51bb474ebc0/fsurg-09-1061566-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f228/9852342/2d7498092fb4/fsurg-09-1061566-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f228/9852342/76bdfd886622/fsurg-09-1061566-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f228/9852342/d810be4a781e/fsurg-09-1061566-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f228/9852342/35f4c0e2d7e9/fsurg-09-1061566-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f228/9852342/e51bb474ebc0/fsurg-09-1061566-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f228/9852342/2d7498092fb4/fsurg-09-1061566-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f228/9852342/76bdfd886622/fsurg-09-1061566-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f228/9852342/d810be4a781e/fsurg-09-1061566-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Clinical efficacy and imaging outcomes of unilateral biportal endoscopy with unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression in the treatment of severe lumbar spinal stenosis.单侧双门内镜联合单侧椎板切开术双侧减压治疗重度腰椎管狭窄症的临床疗效及影像学结果
Front Surg. 2023 Jan 6;9:1061566. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1061566. eCollection 2022.
2
[Comparative study of decompression of unilateral biportal endoscopic compared to laminectomy with fusion and internal fixation in the treatment of severe lumbar spinal stenosis].[单侧双门内镜减压术与椎板切除融合内固定术治疗重度腰椎管狭窄症的对比研究]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2022 Nov 8;102(41):3281-3287. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20220720-01583.
3
Decompression unilateral biportal endoscopy for severe degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: A comparative study with decompression open discectomy.单侧双门孔内镜减压治疗重度退行性腰椎管狭窄症:与开放式椎间盘切除术减压的比较研究
Front Neurol. 2023 Feb 22;14:1132698. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1132698. eCollection 2023.
4
[Comparison of effectiveness between unilateral biportal endoscopic and uniportal interlaminar endoscopic decompression in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis].单侧双通道内镜与单通道椎间孔内镜减压治疗腰椎管狭窄症的疗效比较
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2024 Mar 15;38(3):324-330. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202312029.
5
Consecutive Case Series of Uniportal Full-endoscopic Unilateral Laminotomy for Bilateral Decompression in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Relationship between Decompression Range and Functional Outcomes.连续单侧内窥镜下小切口双侧减压治疗腰椎管狭窄症的病例系列研究:减压范围与功能结局的关系。
Orthop Surg. 2023 Dec;15(12):3153-3161. doi: 10.1111/os.13928. Epub 2023 Oct 19.
6
[Early-effectiveness of unilateral biportal endoscopic laminectomy in treatment of two-level lumbar spinal stenosis].[单侧双通道内镜下椎板切除术治疗双节段腰椎管狭窄症的早期疗效]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2023 Jun 15;37(6):706-712. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202302014.
7
Comparison of biportal endoscopic technique and uniportal endoscopic technique in Unilateral Laminectomy for Bilateral Decomprssion (ULBD) for lumbar spinal stenosis.双侧减压单侧入路内镜下腰椎间孔切开术与单通道内镜下腰椎间孔切开术治疗腰椎管狭窄症的比较。
Asian J Surg. 2024 Jan;47(1):112-117. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2023.05.068. Epub 2023 Jun 17.
8
Early Clinical and Radiologic Evaluation of Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Unilateral Laminotomy and Bilateral Decompression in Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Retrospective Study.单侧双门内镜下单侧椎板切开术及双侧减压治疗退行性腰椎管狭窄症的早期临床与影像学评估:一项回顾性研究
J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg. 2025 Sep;86(5):428-436. doi: 10.1055/a-2281-2135. Epub 2024 Mar 5.
9
Comparative analysis of three types of minimally invasive decompressive surgery for lumbar central stenosis: biportal endoscopy, uniportal endoscopy, and microsurgery.三种微创减压手术治疗腰椎中央型狭窄的对比分析:双通道内镜、单通道内镜和显微镜手术。
Neurosurg Focus. 2019 May 1;46(5):E9. doi: 10.3171/2019.2.FOCUS197.
10
[Short-term effectiveness of unilateral biportal endoscopy technique in treatment of lumbar lateral saphenous fossa combined with intervertebral foramina stenosis via contralateral sublaminar approach].[单侧双通道内镜技术经对侧椎板下入路治疗腰椎外侧隐窝合并椎间孔狭窄的短期疗效]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2024 Jul 15;38(7):874-879. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202404009.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of clinical outcomes between biportal and uniportal full-endoscopy techniques in lumbar spinal stenosis with bilateral symptoms.双侧症状腰椎管狭窄症中双门与单门全内镜技术临床疗效的比较
World J Orthop. 2025 Jul 18;16(7):107698. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v16.i7.107698.
2
Comparison of short-term clinical outcomes and muscle injury in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis undergoing arthroscopic-assisted uni-portal spinal surgery, unilateral biportal endoscopic surgery, and percutaneous interlaminar lumbar discectomy: a six-month follow-up.关节镜辅助单通道脊柱手术、单侧双通道内镜手术和经皮椎间孔腰椎间盘切除术治疗腰椎管狭窄症患者的短期临床疗效及肌肉损伤比较:六个月随访
J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 Jul 21;20(1):684. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-06088-1.
3

本文引用的文献

1
A Review of Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Decompression for Degenerative Lumbar Canal Stenosis.单侧双门内镜减压治疗退变性腰椎管狭窄症的综述
Int J Spine Surg. 2021 Dec;15(suppl 3):S65-S71. doi: 10.14444/8165.
2
Clinical Outcomes of Selective Single-Level Lumbar Endoscopic Unilateral Laminotomy for Bilateral Decompression of Multilevel Lumbar Spinal Stenosis and Risk Factors of Reoperation.选择性单节段腰椎内镜下单侧椎板切开术治疗多节段腰椎管狭窄症双侧减压的临床疗效及再手术危险因素
Global Spine J. 2023 Jun;13(5):1350-1357. doi: 10.1177/21925682211033575. Epub 2021 Jul 19.
3
Comparison Between Fusion and Non-Fusion Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Meta-analysis.
Biportal endoscopic bilateral decompression in lumbar spinal stenosis: a 3-year retrospective cohort study.腰椎管狭窄症的双孔道内镜双侧减压:一项3年的回顾性队列研究。
Front Surg. 2025 May 30;12:1601944. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1601944. eCollection 2025.
4
Use of Fluid Gelatin in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Undergoing Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial.液体明胶在单侧双孔道内镜下腰椎管狭窄症中的应用:一项前瞻性随机对照试验
Orthop Surg. 2025 May;17(5):1340-1348. doi: 10.1111/os.70009. Epub 2025 Feb 23.
5
Comparative Efficacy of Unilateral Biportal Endoscopy vs Traditional Surgery in Lumbar Degenerative Disorders.单侧双孔内镜与传统手术治疗腰椎退行性疾病的疗效比较
Med Sci Monit. 2024 Dec 14;30:e946468. doi: 10.12659/MSM.946468.
6
Comparison of surgical invasiveness and hidden blood loss between unilateral double portal endoscopic lumbar disc extraction and percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis.单侧双通道内镜下腰椎间盘取出术与经皮内镜椎间孔入路腰椎间融合术治疗腰椎管狭窄症的手术侵袭性和隐性失血比较。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 Nov 21;19(1):778. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-05274-x.
7
Complications in Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery in the Last 10 Years: A Narrative Review.过去十年微创脊柱手术的并发症:一项叙述性综述
Neurospine. 2024 Sep;21(3):770-803. doi: 10.14245/ns.2448652.326. Epub 2024 Sep 30.
8
Five-step unilateral biportal endoscopic surgery for central lumbar canal stenosis: "Z" technique nuance.五步单侧双孔道内镜手术治疗中央型腰椎管狭窄症:“Z”技术细节
Neurosurg Focus Video. 2024 Apr 1;10(2):V3. doi: 10.3171/2024.1.FOCVID23182. eCollection 2024 Apr.
9
The Method of Portal Making in Lumbar Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Surgery with Different Operative Approaches According to the Constant Anatomical Landmarks of the Lumbar Spine: A Review of the Literature.基于腰椎恒定解剖标志采用不同手术入路的腰椎单侧双孔通道内镜手术中通道建立方法:文献综述
Global Spine J. 2024 Jul;14(6):1838-1861. doi: 10.1177/21925682241230465. Epub 2024 Feb 5.
融合与非融合手术治疗腰椎管狭窄症的比较:一项荟萃分析。
Adv Ther. 2021 Mar;38(3):1404-1414. doi: 10.1007/s12325-020-01604-7. Epub 2021 Jan 24.
4
Biportal endoscopic decompression vs. microscopic decompression for lumbar canal stenosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.双门内镜减压术与显微镜下减压术治疗腰椎管狭窄症的系统评价与Meta分析
Exp Ther Med. 2020 Sep;20(3):2743-2751. doi: 10.3892/etm.2020.9001. Epub 2020 Jul 13.
5
Microendoscopic decompression for lumbosacral foraminal stenosis: a novel surgical strategy based on anatomical considerations using 3D image fusion with MRI/CT.腰骶部椎间孔狭窄的显微内镜减压术:一种基于解剖学考虑并结合MRI/CT三维图像融合的新型手术策略。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2020 Aug 7;33(6):789-795. doi: 10.3171/2020.5.SPINE20352. Print 2020 Dec 1.
6
Dural Injury in Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Spinal Surgery.单侧双门通道脊柱内镜手术中的硬膜损伤
Global Spine J. 2021 Jul;11(6):845-851. doi: 10.1177/2192568220941446. Epub 2020 Aug 7.
7
Unilateral biportal endoscopic decompression for degenerative lumbar canal stenosis.单侧双门内镜下减压治疗退变性腰椎管狭窄症
J Spine Surg. 2020 Jun;6(2):438-446. doi: 10.21037/jss.2020.03.08.
8
Clinical Comparison of Full-Endoscopic and Microscopic Unilateral Laminotomy for Bilateral Decompression in the Treatment of Elderly Lumbar Spinal stenosis: A Retrospective Study with 12-Month Follow-Up.全内镜与显微镜下单侧椎板切开双侧减压治疗老年腰椎管狭窄症的临床比较:一项12个月随访的回顾性研究
J Pain Res. 2020 Jun 11;13:1377-1384. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S254275. eCollection 2020.
9
Posterolateral fusion combined with posterior decompression shows superiority in the treatment of severe lumbar spinal stenosis without lumbar disc protrusion or prolapse: a retrospective cohort study.后路融合联合后路减压治疗无腰椎间盘突出或脱垂的重度腰椎管狭窄症具有优势:一项回顾性队列研究。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2020 Jan 22;15(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-1552-8.
10
Pooled analysis of unsuccessful percutaneous biportal endoscopic surgery outcomes from a multi-institutional retrospective cohort of 797 cases.多机构回顾性队列 797 例中经皮双腔内镜手术失败结局的汇总分析。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2020 Feb;162(2):279-287. doi: 10.1007/s00701-019-04162-2. Epub 2019 Dec 9.