Arslan Umut, Karaağaoğlu Ergun, Özkan Gökhan, Kanlı Aydan
Department of Biostatistics, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Adnan Menderes University Faculty of Dentistry, Aydın, Turkey.
Balkan Med J. 2014 Sep;31(3):214-8. doi: 10.5152/balkanmedj.2014.13218. Epub 2014 Sep 1.
Several methods are available to evaluate the performance of the tests when the purpose of the diagnostic test is to discriminate between two possible disease states. However multi-class diagnostic problems frequently appear in many areas of medical science. Hence, there is a need for methods which will enable us to characterize the accuracy of diagnostic tests when there are more than two possible disease states.
To show that two information theory measures, information content (IC) and proportional reduction in diagnostic uncertainty (PRDU), can be used for the evaluation of the performance of diagnostic tests for multi-class diagnostic problems that may appear in different areas of medical science.
Diagnostic accuracy study.
Sixty freshly extracted permanent human molar and pre-molar teeth suspected to have occlusal caries lesions were selected for the study and were assessed by two experienced examiners. Each examiner performed two evaluations. Histological examination was used as the gold standard. The scores of the histological examination were defined as sound (n=11), enamel caries (n=22) and dentin caries (n=27). Diagnostic performance of i) visual inspection, ii) radiography, iii) laser fluorescence (LF) and iv) micro-computed tomography (M-CT) caries detection methods was evaluated by calculating IC and PRDU.
Micro-computed tomography examination was the best method among the diagnostic techniques for the diagnosis of occlusal caries in terms of both IC and PRDU. M-CT examination supplied the maximum diagnostic information about the diagnosis of occlusal caries in the first (IC: 1.056; p<0.05), (PRDU: 70.5%) and second evaluation (IC: 1.105; p<0.05), (PRDU: 73.8%) for the first examiner. M-CT examination was the best method among the diagnostic techniques for the second examiner in both the first (IC:1.105; p<0.05), (PRDU:73.8%) and second evaluation (IC:1.061; p<0.05), (PRDU:70.8%). IC and PRDU were lowest for visual inspection.
The present study demonstrates that IC and PRDU can be used to evaluate diagnostic test performance when multiple disease states are being evaluated.
当诊断测试的目的是区分两种可能的疾病状态时,有几种方法可用于评估测试的性能。然而,多类别诊断问题在医学科学的许多领域经常出现。因此,需要一些方法来使我们能够在存在两种以上可能的疾病状态时表征诊断测试的准确性。
表明两种信息论指标,即信息含量(IC)和诊断不确定性的比例降低(PRDU),可用于评估医学科学不同领域可能出现的多类别诊断问题的诊断测试性能。
诊断准确性研究。
选择60颗新拔除的疑似有咬合面龋损的人类恒牙和前磨牙进行研究,并由两名经验丰富的检查者进行评估。每位检查者进行两次评估。组织学检查用作金标准。组织学检查的评分定义为正常(n = 11)、釉质龋(n = 22)和牙本质龋(n = 27)。通过计算IC和PRDU评估i)目视检查、ii)X线摄影、iii)激光荧光(LF)和iv)显微计算机断层扫描(M-CT)龋病检测方法的诊断性能。
就IC和PRDU而言,显微计算机断层扫描检查是诊断咬合面龋的诊断技术中最好的方法。对于第一位检查者,M-CT检查在第一次评估(IC:1.056;p < 0.05),(PRDU:70.5%)和第二次评估(IC:1.105;p < 0.05),(PRDU:73.8%)中提供了关于咬合面龋诊断的最大诊断信息。对于第二位检查者,M-CT检查在第一次评估(IC:1.105;p < 0.05),(PRDU:73.8%)和第二次评估(IC:1.061;p < 0.05),(PRDU:70.8%)中都是诊断技术中最好的方法。目视检查的IC和PRDU最低。
本研究表明,当评估多种疾病状态时,IC和PRDU可用于评估诊断测试性能。