Eze Ikenna C, Hemkens Lars G, Bucher Heiner C, Hoffmann Barbara, Schindler Christian, Künzli Nino, Schikowski Tamara, Probst-Hensch Nicole M
Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.
Environ Health Perspect. 2015 May;123(5):381-9. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1307823. Epub 2015 Jan 27.
Air pollution is hypothesized to be a risk factor for diabetes. Epidemiological evidence is inconsistent and has not been systematically evaluated.
We systematically reviewed epidemiological evidence on the association between air pollution and diabetes, and synthesized results of studies on type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).
We systematically searched electronic literature databases (last search, 29 April 2014) for studies reporting the association between air pollution (particle concentration or traffic exposure) and diabetes (type 1, type 2, or gestational). We systematically evaluated risk of bias and role of potential confounders in all studies. We synthesized reported associations with T2DM in meta-analyses using random-effects models and conducted various sensitivity analyses.
We included 13 studies (8 on T2DM, 2 on type 1, 3 on gestational diabetes), all conducted in Europe or North America. Five studies were longitudinal, 5 cross-sectional, 2 case-control, and 1 ecologic. Risk of bias, air pollution assessment, and confounder control varied across studies. Dose-response effects were not reported. Meta-analyses of 3 studies on PM2.5 (particulate matter ≤ 2.5 μm in diameter) and 4 studies on NO2 (nitrogen dioxide) showed increased risk of T2DM by 8-10% per 10-μg/m3 increase in exposure [PM2.5: 1.10 (95% CI: 1.02, 1.18); NO2: 1.08 (95% CI: 1.00, 1.17)]. Associations were stronger in females. Sensitivity analyses showed similar results.
Existing evidence indicates a positive association of air pollution and T2DM risk, albeit there is high risk of bias. High-quality studies assessing dose-response effects are needed. Research should be expanded to developing countries where outdoor and indoor air pollution are high.
空气污染被认为是糖尿病的一个风险因素。流行病学证据并不一致,且尚未得到系统评估。
我们系统回顾了关于空气污染与糖尿病之间关联的流行病学证据,并综合了2型糖尿病(T2DM)的研究结果。
我们系统检索了电子文献数据库(最后一次检索时间为2014年4月29日),以查找报告空气污染(颗粒物浓度或交通暴露)与糖尿病(1型、2型或妊娠期糖尿病)之间关联的研究。我们系统评估了所有研究中的偏倚风险和潜在混杂因素的作用。我们使用随机效应模型在荟萃分析中综合报告的与T2DM的关联,并进行了各种敏感性分析。
我们纳入了13项研究(8项关于T2DM,2项关于1型糖尿病,3项关于妊娠期糖尿病),所有研究均在欧洲或北美进行。5项研究为纵向研究,5项为横断面研究,2项为病例对照研究,1项为生态学研究。不同研究之间的偏倚风险、空气污染评估和混杂因素控制各不相同。未报告剂量反应效应。对3项关于PM2.5(直径≤2.5μm的颗粒物)的研究和4项关于NO2(二氧化氮)的研究进行的荟萃分析显示,每增加10μg/m3的暴露,T2DM风险增加8 - 10% [PM2.5:1.10(95%CI:1.02,1.18);NO2:1.08(95%CI:1.00,1.17)]。女性中的关联更强。敏感性分析显示了类似的结果。
现有证据表明空气污染与T2DM风险呈正相关,尽管存在较高的偏倚风险。需要开展评估剂量反应效应的高质量研究。研究应扩展到室外和室内空气污染严重的发展中国家。